Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I

The semantic system

Terry E. Goldberg, Mark S. Aloia, Monica L. Gourovitch, David Missar, David Pickar, Daniel Weinberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Few studies have explored in detail the relation of cognitive deficits in attention, working memory, and semantics to thought disorder. The authors sought to determine whether thought disorder resides in the semantic system or elsewhere. Method: Twenty-three normal comparison subjects and 23 patients with schizophrenia participated in the study. All subjects received tests of executive function and working memory, including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Letter-Number Span test; a test of deployment of attentional resources; and tests of semantic processing and language comprehension, including the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, the Speed and Capacity of Language-Processing Test, the Boston Naming Test, and tests of semantic verbal fluency and phonologic verbal fluency, from which was derived a difference score. All patients were also administered the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication to assess thought disorder. Results: The normal subjects were compared with the schizophrenic patients who were rated as having mild thought disorder (N=13) or moderate to severe thought disorder (N=10). While differences between the schizophrenic subgroups and the comparison subjects were observed on nearly all tests, a large difference in effect size between the two schizophrenic subgroups was apparent only in the verbal fluency difference score. In a series of multiple regression analyses, two variables made significant contributions to the prediction of positive thought disorder: the verbal fluency difference score and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test score. Conclusions: These results suggest that clinically rated thought disorder is associated with and may result from semantic processing abnormalities. In particular, patients with more severe thought disorder may have difficulty accessing semantic items because of disorganization of the semantic systems and, to a more limited degree, may also lack a semantic or conceptual knowledge base.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1671-1676
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume155
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Semantics
Language Tests
Short-Term Memory
Language
Speech Disorders
Knowledge Bases
Executive Function
Schizophrenia
Communication
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Goldberg, T. E., Aloia, M. S., Gourovitch, M. L., Missar, D., Pickar, D., & Weinberger, D. (1998). Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I: The semantic system. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(12), 1671-1676.

Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I : The semantic system. / Goldberg, Terry E.; Aloia, Mark S.; Gourovitch, Monica L.; Missar, David; Pickar, David; Weinberger, Daniel.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 155, No. 12, 12.1998, p. 1671-1676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldberg, TE, Aloia, MS, Gourovitch, ML, Missar, D, Pickar, D & Weinberger, D 1998, 'Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I: The semantic system', American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 155, no. 12, pp. 1671-1676.
Goldberg TE, Aloia MS, Gourovitch ML, Missar D, Pickar D, Weinberger D. Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I: The semantic system. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;155(12):1671-1676.
Goldberg, Terry E. ; Aloia, Mark S. ; Gourovitch, Monica L. ; Missar, David ; Pickar, David ; Weinberger, Daniel. / Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I : The semantic system. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 1998 ; Vol. 155, No. 12. pp. 1671-1676.
@article{c96072d80a4e430f95fa9d9e1a4dec51,
title = "Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I: The semantic system",
abstract = "Objective: Few studies have explored in detail the relation of cognitive deficits in attention, working memory, and semantics to thought disorder. The authors sought to determine whether thought disorder resides in the semantic system or elsewhere. Method: Twenty-three normal comparison subjects and 23 patients with schizophrenia participated in the study. All subjects received tests of executive function and working memory, including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Letter-Number Span test; a test of deployment of attentional resources; and tests of semantic processing and language comprehension, including the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, the Speed and Capacity of Language-Processing Test, the Boston Naming Test, and tests of semantic verbal fluency and phonologic verbal fluency, from which was derived a difference score. All patients were also administered the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication to assess thought disorder. Results: The normal subjects were compared with the schizophrenic patients who were rated as having mild thought disorder (N=13) or moderate to severe thought disorder (N=10). While differences between the schizophrenic subgroups and the comparison subjects were observed on nearly all tests, a large difference in effect size between the two schizophrenic subgroups was apparent only in the verbal fluency difference score. In a series of multiple regression analyses, two variables made significant contributions to the prediction of positive thought disorder: the verbal fluency difference score and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test score. Conclusions: These results suggest that clinically rated thought disorder is associated with and may result from semantic processing abnormalities. In particular, patients with more severe thought disorder may have difficulty accessing semantic items because of disorganization of the semantic systems and, to a more limited degree, may also lack a semantic or conceptual knowledge base.",
author = "Goldberg, {Terry E.} and Aloia, {Mark S.} and Gourovitch, {Monica L.} and David Missar and David Pickar and Daniel Weinberger",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "1671--1676",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I

T2 - The semantic system

AU - Goldberg, Terry E.

AU - Aloia, Mark S.

AU - Gourovitch, Monica L.

AU - Missar, David

AU - Pickar, David

AU - Weinberger, Daniel

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - Objective: Few studies have explored in detail the relation of cognitive deficits in attention, working memory, and semantics to thought disorder. The authors sought to determine whether thought disorder resides in the semantic system or elsewhere. Method: Twenty-three normal comparison subjects and 23 patients with schizophrenia participated in the study. All subjects received tests of executive function and working memory, including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Letter-Number Span test; a test of deployment of attentional resources; and tests of semantic processing and language comprehension, including the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, the Speed and Capacity of Language-Processing Test, the Boston Naming Test, and tests of semantic verbal fluency and phonologic verbal fluency, from which was derived a difference score. All patients were also administered the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication to assess thought disorder. Results: The normal subjects were compared with the schizophrenic patients who were rated as having mild thought disorder (N=13) or moderate to severe thought disorder (N=10). While differences between the schizophrenic subgroups and the comparison subjects were observed on nearly all tests, a large difference in effect size between the two schizophrenic subgroups was apparent only in the verbal fluency difference score. In a series of multiple regression analyses, two variables made significant contributions to the prediction of positive thought disorder: the verbal fluency difference score and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test score. Conclusions: These results suggest that clinically rated thought disorder is associated with and may result from semantic processing abnormalities. In particular, patients with more severe thought disorder may have difficulty accessing semantic items because of disorganization of the semantic systems and, to a more limited degree, may also lack a semantic or conceptual knowledge base.

AB - Objective: Few studies have explored in detail the relation of cognitive deficits in attention, working memory, and semantics to thought disorder. The authors sought to determine whether thought disorder resides in the semantic system or elsewhere. Method: Twenty-three normal comparison subjects and 23 patients with schizophrenia participated in the study. All subjects received tests of executive function and working memory, including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Letter-Number Span test; a test of deployment of attentional resources; and tests of semantic processing and language comprehension, including the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, the Speed and Capacity of Language-Processing Test, the Boston Naming Test, and tests of semantic verbal fluency and phonologic verbal fluency, from which was derived a difference score. All patients were also administered the Scale for the Assessment of Thought, Language, and Communication to assess thought disorder. Results: The normal subjects were compared with the schizophrenic patients who were rated as having mild thought disorder (N=13) or moderate to severe thought disorder (N=10). While differences between the schizophrenic subgroups and the comparison subjects were observed on nearly all tests, a large difference in effect size between the two schizophrenic subgroups was apparent only in the verbal fluency difference score. In a series of multiple regression analyses, two variables made significant contributions to the prediction of positive thought disorder: the verbal fluency difference score and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test score. Conclusions: These results suggest that clinically rated thought disorder is associated with and may result from semantic processing abnormalities. In particular, patients with more severe thought disorder may have difficulty accessing semantic items because of disorganization of the semantic systems and, to a more limited degree, may also lack a semantic or conceptual knowledge base.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031790559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031790559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 155

SP - 1671

EP - 1676

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 12

ER -