Cognitive performance and BMI in childhood: Shared genetic influences between reaction time but not response inhibition

Alexis C. Frazier-Wood, Susan Carnell, Oscar Pena, Sheryl O. Hughes, Teresia M. O'Connor, Philip Asherson, Jonna Kuntsi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this work is to understand whether shared genetic influences can explain the association between obesity and cognitive performance, including slower and more variable reaction times (RTs) and worse response inhibition. Methods: RT on a four-choice RT task and the go/no-go task, and commission errors on the go/no-go task for 1,312 twins ages 7-10 years were measured. BMI was measured at 9-12 years. Biometric twin models were run to give an estimate of the genetic correlation (rG) between body mass index (BMI) and three cognitive measures: mean RT (MRT), RT variability (RTV; the standard deviation of RTs), and commission errors (a measure of response inhibition). Results: Genetic correlations indicated that 20%-30% of the genes underlying BMI were shared with both RT measures. However, only small phenotypic correlations between MRT and RTV with later BMI (rPh = ∼0.1) were observed. Commission errors were unassociated with later BMI (rPh = -0.03, ns). Conclusions: Our results are the first to demonstrate significant shared genetic effects between RT performance and BMI. Our findings add biological support to the notion that obesity is associated with slower and more variable RTs. However, our results also emphasize the small nature of the association, which may explain previous negative findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2312-2318
Number of pages7
JournalObesity
Volume22
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive performance and BMI in childhood: Shared genetic influences between reaction time but not response inhibition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this