Cognitive measures of adolescent depression

Unique or unitary constructs?

Golda S. Ginsburg, Susan G. Silva, Rachel H. Jacobs, Simon Tonev, Rick H. Hoyle, Julie Newman Kingery, Mark A. Reinecke, John F. Curry, John S. March

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The factor structure of several self-report questionnaires assessing depression-relevant cognitions frequently employed in clinical research was examined in a sample of 390 adolescents (M age=14.54; 216 girls; 74% Caucasian) with current major depressive disorder enrolled in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study. A four-factor solution resulted, accounting for 65% of the total variance. The factors were labeled (a) Cognitive Distortions and Maladaptive Beliefs, (b) Cognitive Avoidance, (c) Positive Outlook, and (d) Solution-Focused Thinking. Internal consistencies for the factor-based composite scores were .83, .85, .84, and .82, respectively. Girls endorsed more negative cognitions than boys on three of the four factors. Maladaptive cognitions were positively related to severity of depression and predicted treatment response. Taken together, findings indicated that there are four distinct domains of cognitions that are present among adolescents with depression that are tapped by several widely used self-report measures of cognitions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)790-802
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Cognition
Depression
Self Report
Major Depressive Disorder
Therapeutics
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Ginsburg, G. S., Silva, S. G., Jacobs, R. H., Tonev, S., Hoyle, R. H., Kingery, J. N., ... March, J. S. (2009). Cognitive measures of adolescent depression: Unique or unitary constructs? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38(6), 790-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410903259015

Cognitive measures of adolescent depression : Unique or unitary constructs? / Ginsburg, Golda S.; Silva, Susan G.; Jacobs, Rachel H.; Tonev, Simon; Hoyle, Rick H.; Kingery, Julie Newman; Reinecke, Mark A.; Curry, John F.; March, John S.

In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2009, p. 790-802.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ginsburg, GS, Silva, SG, Jacobs, RH, Tonev, S, Hoyle, RH, Kingery, JN, Reinecke, MA, Curry, JF & March, JS 2009, 'Cognitive measures of adolescent depression: Unique or unitary constructs?', Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 790-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410903259015
Ginsburg, Golda S. ; Silva, Susan G. ; Jacobs, Rachel H. ; Tonev, Simon ; Hoyle, Rick H. ; Kingery, Julie Newman ; Reinecke, Mark A. ; Curry, John F. ; March, John S. / Cognitive measures of adolescent depression : Unique or unitary constructs?. In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 790-802.
@article{42a3d9a2181c4202b72cb1e6b74e2780,
title = "Cognitive measures of adolescent depression: Unique or unitary constructs?",
abstract = "The factor structure of several self-report questionnaires assessing depression-relevant cognitions frequently employed in clinical research was examined in a sample of 390 adolescents (M age=14.54; 216 girls; 74{\%} Caucasian) with current major depressive disorder enrolled in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study. A four-factor solution resulted, accounting for 65{\%} of the total variance. The factors were labeled (a) Cognitive Distortions and Maladaptive Beliefs, (b) Cognitive Avoidance, (c) Positive Outlook, and (d) Solution-Focused Thinking. Internal consistencies for the factor-based composite scores were .83, .85, .84, and .82, respectively. Girls endorsed more negative cognitions than boys on three of the four factors. Maladaptive cognitions were positively related to severity of depression and predicted treatment response. Taken together, findings indicated that there are four distinct domains of cognitions that are present among adolescents with depression that are tapped by several widely used self-report measures of cognitions.",
author = "Ginsburg, {Golda S.} and Silva, {Susan G.} and Jacobs, {Rachel H.} and Simon Tonev and Hoyle, {Rick H.} and Kingery, {Julie Newman} and Reinecke, {Mark A.} and Curry, {John F.} and March, {John S.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/15374410903259015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "790--802",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
issn = "1537-4416",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive measures of adolescent depression

T2 - Unique or unitary constructs?

AU - Ginsburg, Golda S.

AU - Silva, Susan G.

AU - Jacobs, Rachel H.

AU - Tonev, Simon

AU - Hoyle, Rick H.

AU - Kingery, Julie Newman

AU - Reinecke, Mark A.

AU - Curry, John F.

AU - March, John S.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The factor structure of several self-report questionnaires assessing depression-relevant cognitions frequently employed in clinical research was examined in a sample of 390 adolescents (M age=14.54; 216 girls; 74% Caucasian) with current major depressive disorder enrolled in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study. A four-factor solution resulted, accounting for 65% of the total variance. The factors were labeled (a) Cognitive Distortions and Maladaptive Beliefs, (b) Cognitive Avoidance, (c) Positive Outlook, and (d) Solution-Focused Thinking. Internal consistencies for the factor-based composite scores were .83, .85, .84, and .82, respectively. Girls endorsed more negative cognitions than boys on three of the four factors. Maladaptive cognitions were positively related to severity of depression and predicted treatment response. Taken together, findings indicated that there are four distinct domains of cognitions that are present among adolescents with depression that are tapped by several widely used self-report measures of cognitions.

AB - The factor structure of several self-report questionnaires assessing depression-relevant cognitions frequently employed in clinical research was examined in a sample of 390 adolescents (M age=14.54; 216 girls; 74% Caucasian) with current major depressive disorder enrolled in the Treatment of Adolescents with Depression Study. A four-factor solution resulted, accounting for 65% of the total variance. The factors were labeled (a) Cognitive Distortions and Maladaptive Beliefs, (b) Cognitive Avoidance, (c) Positive Outlook, and (d) Solution-Focused Thinking. Internal consistencies for the factor-based composite scores were .83, .85, .84, and .82, respectively. Girls endorsed more negative cognitions than boys on three of the four factors. Maladaptive cognitions were positively related to severity of depression and predicted treatment response. Taken together, findings indicated that there are four distinct domains of cognitions that are present among adolescents with depression that are tapped by several widely used self-report measures of cognitions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951656762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951656762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15374410903259015

DO - 10.1080/15374410903259015

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 790

EP - 802

JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

SN - 1537-4416

IS - 6

ER -