Cognitive and language performance predicts effects of spelling intervention and tDCS in Primary Progressive Aphasia

Vânia de Aguiar, Yi Zhao, Bronte N. Ficek, Kimberly Webster, Adrià Rofes, Haley Wendt, Constantine Frangakis, Brian Caffo, Argye E. Hillis, Brenda Rapp, Kyrana Tsapkini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Predictors of treatment effects allow individual tailoring of treatment characteristics, thereby saving resources and optimizing outcomes. Electrical stimulation coupled with language intervention has shown promising results in improving language performance in individuals with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The current study aimed to identify language and cognitive variables associated with response to therapy consisting of language intervention combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Forty individuals with PPA received written naming/spelling intervention combined with anodal tDCS or Sham, using a between-subjects, randomized design, with intervention delivered over a period of 3 weeks. Participants were assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests before and after each phase. We measured letter accuracy during spelling of trained and untrained words, before, immediately after, 2 weeks, and 2 months after therapy. We used step-wise regression methods to identify variables amongst the neuropsychological measures and experimental factors that were significantly associated with therapy outcomes at each time-point. For trained words, improvement was related to pre-therapy scores, in RAVLT (5 trials sum), pseudoword spelling, object naming, digit span backward, spatial span backward and years post symptom onset. Regarding generalization to untrained words, improvement in spelling was associated with pseudoword spelling, RAVLT proactive interference, RAVLT immediate recall. Generalization effects were larger under tDCS compared to Sham at the 2-month post training measurement. We conclude that, for trained words, patients who improve the most are those who retain for longer language skills such as sublexical spelling processes (phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences) and word retrieval, and other cognitive functions such as executive functions and working memory, and those who have a better learning capacity. Generalization to untrained words occurs through improvement in knowledge of phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences. Furthermore, tDCS enhances the generalizability and duration of therapy effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)66-84
Number of pages19
JournalCortex
Volume124
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020

Fingerprint

Primary Progressive Aphasia
Language
Short-Term Memory
Therapeutics
Language Therapy
Neuropsychological Tests
Executive Function
Cognition
Electric Stimulation
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Learning

Keywords

  • Predictors
  • Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA)
  • Rehabilitation
  • Spelling
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Cognitive and language performance predicts effects of spelling intervention and tDCS in Primary Progressive Aphasia. / de Aguiar, Vânia; Zhao, Yi; Ficek, Bronte N.; Webster, Kimberly; Rofes, Adrià; Wendt, Haley; Frangakis, Constantine; Caffo, Brian; Hillis, Argye E.; Rapp, Brenda; Tsapkini, Kyrana.

In: Cortex, Vol. 124, 03.2020, p. 66-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

de Aguiar, Vânia ; Zhao, Yi ; Ficek, Bronte N. ; Webster, Kimberly ; Rofes, Adrià ; Wendt, Haley ; Frangakis, Constantine ; Caffo, Brian ; Hillis, Argye E. ; Rapp, Brenda ; Tsapkini, Kyrana. / Cognitive and language performance predicts effects of spelling intervention and tDCS in Primary Progressive Aphasia. In: Cortex. 2020 ; Vol. 124. pp. 66-84.
@article{6b4ff34ec3574c17974e55f6b174eb65,
title = "Cognitive and language performance predicts effects of spelling intervention and tDCS in Primary Progressive Aphasia",
abstract = "Predictors of treatment effects allow individual tailoring of treatment characteristics, thereby saving resources and optimizing outcomes. Electrical stimulation coupled with language intervention has shown promising results in improving language performance in individuals with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The current study aimed to identify language and cognitive variables associated with response to therapy consisting of language intervention combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Forty individuals with PPA received written naming/spelling intervention combined with anodal tDCS or Sham, using a between-subjects, randomized design, with intervention delivered over a period of 3 weeks. Participants were assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests before and after each phase. We measured letter accuracy during spelling of trained and untrained words, before, immediately after, 2 weeks, and 2 months after therapy. We used step-wise regression methods to identify variables amongst the neuropsychological measures and experimental factors that were significantly associated with therapy outcomes at each time-point. For trained words, improvement was related to pre-therapy scores, in RAVLT (5 trials sum), pseudoword spelling, object naming, digit span backward, spatial span backward and years post symptom onset. Regarding generalization to untrained words, improvement in spelling was associated with pseudoword spelling, RAVLT proactive interference, RAVLT immediate recall. Generalization effects were larger under tDCS compared to Sham at the 2-month post training measurement. We conclude that, for trained words, patients who improve the most are those who retain for longer language skills such as sublexical spelling processes (phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences) and word retrieval, and other cognitive functions such as executive functions and working memory, and those who have a better learning capacity. Generalization to untrained words occurs through improvement in knowledge of phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences. Furthermore, tDCS enhances the generalizability and duration of therapy effects.",
keywords = "Predictors, Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA), Rehabilitation, Spelling, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)",
author = "{de Aguiar}, V{\^a}nia and Yi Zhao and Ficek, {Bronte N.} and Kimberly Webster and Adri{\`a} Rofes and Haley Wendt and Constantine Frangakis and Brian Caffo and Hillis, {Argye E.} and Brenda Rapp and Kyrana Tsapkini",
year = "2020",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "66--84",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive and language performance predicts effects of spelling intervention and tDCS in Primary Progressive Aphasia

AU - de Aguiar, Vânia

AU - Zhao, Yi

AU - Ficek, Bronte N.

AU - Webster, Kimberly

AU - Rofes, Adrià

AU - Wendt, Haley

AU - Frangakis, Constantine

AU - Caffo, Brian

AU - Hillis, Argye E.

AU - Rapp, Brenda

AU - Tsapkini, Kyrana

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - Predictors of treatment effects allow individual tailoring of treatment characteristics, thereby saving resources and optimizing outcomes. Electrical stimulation coupled with language intervention has shown promising results in improving language performance in individuals with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The current study aimed to identify language and cognitive variables associated with response to therapy consisting of language intervention combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Forty individuals with PPA received written naming/spelling intervention combined with anodal tDCS or Sham, using a between-subjects, randomized design, with intervention delivered over a period of 3 weeks. Participants were assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests before and after each phase. We measured letter accuracy during spelling of trained and untrained words, before, immediately after, 2 weeks, and 2 months after therapy. We used step-wise regression methods to identify variables amongst the neuropsychological measures and experimental factors that were significantly associated with therapy outcomes at each time-point. For trained words, improvement was related to pre-therapy scores, in RAVLT (5 trials sum), pseudoword spelling, object naming, digit span backward, spatial span backward and years post symptom onset. Regarding generalization to untrained words, improvement in spelling was associated with pseudoword spelling, RAVLT proactive interference, RAVLT immediate recall. Generalization effects were larger under tDCS compared to Sham at the 2-month post training measurement. We conclude that, for trained words, patients who improve the most are those who retain for longer language skills such as sublexical spelling processes (phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences) and word retrieval, and other cognitive functions such as executive functions and working memory, and those who have a better learning capacity. Generalization to untrained words occurs through improvement in knowledge of phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences. Furthermore, tDCS enhances the generalizability and duration of therapy effects.

AB - Predictors of treatment effects allow individual tailoring of treatment characteristics, thereby saving resources and optimizing outcomes. Electrical stimulation coupled with language intervention has shown promising results in improving language performance in individuals with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The current study aimed to identify language and cognitive variables associated with response to therapy consisting of language intervention combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Forty individuals with PPA received written naming/spelling intervention combined with anodal tDCS or Sham, using a between-subjects, randomized design, with intervention delivered over a period of 3 weeks. Participants were assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests before and after each phase. We measured letter accuracy during spelling of trained and untrained words, before, immediately after, 2 weeks, and 2 months after therapy. We used step-wise regression methods to identify variables amongst the neuropsychological measures and experimental factors that were significantly associated with therapy outcomes at each time-point. For trained words, improvement was related to pre-therapy scores, in RAVLT (5 trials sum), pseudoword spelling, object naming, digit span backward, spatial span backward and years post symptom onset. Regarding generalization to untrained words, improvement in spelling was associated with pseudoword spelling, RAVLT proactive interference, RAVLT immediate recall. Generalization effects were larger under tDCS compared to Sham at the 2-month post training measurement. We conclude that, for trained words, patients who improve the most are those who retain for longer language skills such as sublexical spelling processes (phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences) and word retrieval, and other cognitive functions such as executive functions and working memory, and those who have a better learning capacity. Generalization to untrained words occurs through improvement in knowledge of phoneme-to-grapheme correspondences. Furthermore, tDCS enhances the generalizability and duration of therapy effects.

KW - Predictors

KW - Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA)

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Spelling

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076287473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076287473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 31838450

AN - SCOPUS:85076287473

VL - 124

SP - 66

EP - 84

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

ER -