Cognitive and functional progression in Alzheimer disease: A prediction model of latent classes

Miriam L. Haaksma, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga, Marcel G.M. Olde Rikkert, René J.F. Melis, Jeannie-Marie S Leoutsakos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: We sought to replicate a previously published prediction model for progression, developed in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study, using a clinical cohort from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Methods: We included 1120 incident Alzheimer disease (AD) cases with at least one assessment after diagnosis, originating from 31 AD centres from the United States. Trajectories of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb) were modelled jointly over time using parallel-process growth mixture models in order to identify latent classes of trajectories. Bias-corrected multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of class membership and compare these with the predictors found in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study. Results: The best-fitting model contained 3 classes: Class 1 was the largest (63%) and showed the slowest progression on both MMSE and CDR-sb; classes 2 (22%) and 3 (15%) showed moderate and rapid worsening, respectively. Significant predictors of membership in classes 2 and 3, relative to class 1, were worse baseline MMSE and CDR-sb, higher education, and lack of hypertension. Combining all previously mentioned predictors yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and 0.75 for classes 2 and 3, respectively, relative to class 1. Conclusions: Our replication study confirmed that it is possible to predict trajectories of progression in AD with relatively good accuracy. The class distribution was comparable with that of the original study, with most individuals being members of a class with stable or slow progression. This is important for informing newly diagnosed AD patients and their caregivers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1057-1064
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Dementia
Alzheimer Disease
ROC Curve
Caregivers
Logistic Models
Hypertension
Education
Growth

Keywords

  • cognition
  • dementia
  • disease course
  • functioning
  • growth mixture model
  • trajectory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Cognitive and functional progression in Alzheimer disease : A prediction model of latent classes. / Haaksma, Miriam L.; Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia; Olde Rikkert, Marcel G.M.; Melis, René J.F.; Leoutsakos, Jeannie-Marie S.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 33, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 1057-1064.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haaksma, Miriam L. ; Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia ; Olde Rikkert, Marcel G.M. ; Melis, René J.F. ; Leoutsakos, Jeannie-Marie S. / Cognitive and functional progression in Alzheimer disease : A prediction model of latent classes. In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 8. pp. 1057-1064.
@article{d2eb26755a4246d1a3cb0c954fccf9fe,
title = "Cognitive and functional progression in Alzheimer disease: A prediction model of latent classes",
abstract = "Objective: We sought to replicate a previously published prediction model for progression, developed in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study, using a clinical cohort from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Methods: We included 1120 incident Alzheimer disease (AD) cases with at least one assessment after diagnosis, originating from 31 AD centres from the United States. Trajectories of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb) were modelled jointly over time using parallel-process growth mixture models in order to identify latent classes of trajectories. Bias-corrected multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of class membership and compare these with the predictors found in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study. Results: The best-fitting model contained 3 classes: Class 1 was the largest (63{\%}) and showed the slowest progression on both MMSE and CDR-sb; classes 2 (22{\%}) and 3 (15{\%}) showed moderate and rapid worsening, respectively. Significant predictors of membership in classes 2 and 3, relative to class 1, were worse baseline MMSE and CDR-sb, higher education, and lack of hypertension. Combining all previously mentioned predictors yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and 0.75 for classes 2 and 3, respectively, relative to class 1. Conclusions: Our replication study confirmed that it is possible to predict trajectories of progression in AD with relatively good accuracy. The class distribution was comparable with that of the original study, with most individuals being members of a class with stable or slow progression. This is important for informing newly diagnosed AD patients and their caregivers.",
keywords = "cognition, dementia, disease course, functioning, growth mixture model, trajectory",
author = "Haaksma, {Miriam L.} and Amaia Calder{\'o}n-Larra{\~n}aga and {Olde Rikkert}, {Marcel G.M.} and Melis, {Ren{\'e} J.F.} and Leoutsakos, {Jeannie-Marie S}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/gps.4893",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1057--1064",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive and functional progression in Alzheimer disease

T2 - A prediction model of latent classes

AU - Haaksma, Miriam L.

AU - Calderón-Larrañaga, Amaia

AU - Olde Rikkert, Marcel G.M.

AU - Melis, René J.F.

AU - Leoutsakos, Jeannie-Marie S

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Objective: We sought to replicate a previously published prediction model for progression, developed in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study, using a clinical cohort from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Methods: We included 1120 incident Alzheimer disease (AD) cases with at least one assessment after diagnosis, originating from 31 AD centres from the United States. Trajectories of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb) were modelled jointly over time using parallel-process growth mixture models in order to identify latent classes of trajectories. Bias-corrected multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of class membership and compare these with the predictors found in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study. Results: The best-fitting model contained 3 classes: Class 1 was the largest (63%) and showed the slowest progression on both MMSE and CDR-sb; classes 2 (22%) and 3 (15%) showed moderate and rapid worsening, respectively. Significant predictors of membership in classes 2 and 3, relative to class 1, were worse baseline MMSE and CDR-sb, higher education, and lack of hypertension. Combining all previously mentioned predictors yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and 0.75 for classes 2 and 3, respectively, relative to class 1. Conclusions: Our replication study confirmed that it is possible to predict trajectories of progression in AD with relatively good accuracy. The class distribution was comparable with that of the original study, with most individuals being members of a class with stable or slow progression. This is important for informing newly diagnosed AD patients and their caregivers.

AB - Objective: We sought to replicate a previously published prediction model for progression, developed in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study, using a clinical cohort from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. Methods: We included 1120 incident Alzheimer disease (AD) cases with at least one assessment after diagnosis, originating from 31 AD centres from the United States. Trajectories of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb) were modelled jointly over time using parallel-process growth mixture models in order to identify latent classes of trajectories. Bias-corrected multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of class membership and compare these with the predictors found in the Cache County Dementia Progression Study. Results: The best-fitting model contained 3 classes: Class 1 was the largest (63%) and showed the slowest progression on both MMSE and CDR-sb; classes 2 (22%) and 3 (15%) showed moderate and rapid worsening, respectively. Significant predictors of membership in classes 2 and 3, relative to class 1, were worse baseline MMSE and CDR-sb, higher education, and lack of hypertension. Combining all previously mentioned predictors yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and 0.75 for classes 2 and 3, respectively, relative to class 1. Conclusions: Our replication study confirmed that it is possible to predict trajectories of progression in AD with relatively good accuracy. The class distribution was comparable with that of the original study, with most individuals being members of a class with stable or slow progression. This is important for informing newly diagnosed AD patients and their caregivers.

KW - cognition

KW - dementia

KW - disease course

KW - functioning

KW - growth mixture model

KW - trajectory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049777773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049777773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.4893

DO - 10.1002/gps.4893

M3 - Article

C2 - 29761569

AN - SCOPUS:85049777773

VL - 33

SP - 1057

EP - 1064

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

IS - 8

ER -