Clinician-teachers' self-assessments versus learners' perceptions

Donna M. Windish, Amy M Knight, Scott Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Understanding how clinician-teachers' self-assessments compare to learners' impressions can serve to help educators place each of these evaluations in the appropriate context. Past participants of the Johns Hopkins Faculty Development Program and other physician-teachers were surveyed in 2002 regarding their teaching skills and behaviors. We surveyed their learners to compare teacher and learner assessments of teaching proficiency, behaviors, enjoyment, and career satisfaction. In each area, learners' ratings were statistically significantly higher than their teachers' self-ratings. Though it is unclear whether teachers' or learners' assessments are a more accurate reflection of the truth, the more positive learner ratings should promote self-confidence in clinician-educators regarding their teaching abilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-557
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume19
Issue number5 PART 2
StatePublished - May 2004

Fingerprint

Teaching
Aptitude
Physicians
Self-Assessment

Keywords

  • Physician-teachers
  • Self-assessments
  • Teacher evaluations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Clinician-teachers' self-assessments versus learners' perceptions. / Windish, Donna M.; Knight, Amy M; Wright, Scott.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 5 PART 2, 05.2004, p. 554-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17ce411c7a3d426081cce471f7d74da3,
title = "Clinician-teachers' self-assessments versus learners' perceptions",
abstract = "Understanding how clinician-teachers' self-assessments compare to learners' impressions can serve to help educators place each of these evaluations in the appropriate context. Past participants of the Johns Hopkins Faculty Development Program and other physician-teachers were surveyed in 2002 regarding their teaching skills and behaviors. We surveyed their learners to compare teacher and learner assessments of teaching proficiency, behaviors, enjoyment, and career satisfaction. In each area, learners' ratings were statistically significantly higher than their teachers' self-ratings. Though it is unclear whether teachers' or learners' assessments are a more accurate reflection of the truth, the more positive learner ratings should promote self-confidence in clinician-educators regarding their teaching abilities.",
keywords = "Physician-teachers, Self-assessments, Teacher evaluations",
author = "Windish, {Donna M.} and Knight, {Amy M} and Scott Wright",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "554--557",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5 PART 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinician-teachers' self-assessments versus learners' perceptions

AU - Windish, Donna M.

AU - Knight, Amy M

AU - Wright, Scott

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Understanding how clinician-teachers' self-assessments compare to learners' impressions can serve to help educators place each of these evaluations in the appropriate context. Past participants of the Johns Hopkins Faculty Development Program and other physician-teachers were surveyed in 2002 regarding their teaching skills and behaviors. We surveyed their learners to compare teacher and learner assessments of teaching proficiency, behaviors, enjoyment, and career satisfaction. In each area, learners' ratings were statistically significantly higher than their teachers' self-ratings. Though it is unclear whether teachers' or learners' assessments are a more accurate reflection of the truth, the more positive learner ratings should promote self-confidence in clinician-educators regarding their teaching abilities.

AB - Understanding how clinician-teachers' self-assessments compare to learners' impressions can serve to help educators place each of these evaluations in the appropriate context. Past participants of the Johns Hopkins Faculty Development Program and other physician-teachers were surveyed in 2002 regarding their teaching skills and behaviors. We surveyed their learners to compare teacher and learner assessments of teaching proficiency, behaviors, enjoyment, and career satisfaction. In each area, learners' ratings were statistically significantly higher than their teachers' self-ratings. Though it is unclear whether teachers' or learners' assessments are a more accurate reflection of the truth, the more positive learner ratings should promote self-confidence in clinician-educators regarding their teaching abilities.

KW - Physician-teachers

KW - Self-assessments

KW - Teacher evaluations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442573895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2442573895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15109323

AN - SCOPUS:2442573895

VL - 19

SP - 554

EP - 557

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 5 PART 2

ER -