Clinically significant differences exist between curves in operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Mark J. McElroy, Paul David Sponseller, Sara K. Fuhrhop, Colin J. Russell, Peter O. Newton, Michelle C. Marks, James O. Sanders, Muharrem Yazici, Jeff B. Pawelek, Behrooz A. Akbarnia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE.: To determine if statistically significant differences exist between operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (IEOS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in primary curve characteristics, stable vertebra, kyphosis, or lumbar deformity and, if so, to identify the clinical significance of these differences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: To our knowledge, no study has statistically compared radiographical measures of operative IEOS and AIS. METHODS.: We identified operative patients (60, IEOS; 1537, AIS) in 2 multicenter databases and measured preoperative radiographical parameters of interest. The measurements were compared using the Student t test and other appropriate statistical methods (significance, P= 0.05). RESULTS.: The IEOS and AIS groups were significantly different in primary curve magnitude (70 ± 20 vs. 54 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001), stable vertebra location (L3.0 ± 1.4 vs. L2.1 ± 2.2, respectively; P= 0.001), and T2 to T12 kyphosis (40 ± 15 vs. 31 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001). Distribution of major curve apex was unimodal centered close to the thoracolumbar junction in IEOS versus bimodal in AIS. Primary curve type was thoracic in 83% and 79% and thoracolumbar/lumbar in 17% and 21% of patients with IEOS and AIS, respectively. When the overall cohorts were separated into curve types and these subsets were compared, statistically significant differences were found between IEOS and AIS in thoracic primary curves (apex, magnitude, direction, proximal and distal Cobb vertebrae, and lumbar deformity) and thoracolumbar/lumbar primary curves (magnitude). CONCLUSION.: Significant radiographical differences exist between operative IEOS and AIS curves. IEOS curves are greater in magnitude, more kyphotic, less well compensated, and have a more caudal apex and stable vertebra. These findings suggest that younger patients may require more distal instrumentation and that proximal fixation techniques should consider the additional pullout forces created by the greater kyphosis.Level of Evidence: 3

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1368-1374
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume38
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2013

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Kyphosis
Spine
Thorax
Lumbar Vertebrae

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • early-onset
  • idiopathic
  • infantile
  • juvenile
  • Lenke
  • scoliosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Clinically significant differences exist between curves in operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. / McElroy, Mark J.; Sponseller, Paul David; Fuhrhop, Sara K.; Russell, Colin J.; Newton, Peter O.; Marks, Michelle C.; Sanders, James O.; Yazici, Muharrem; Pawelek, Jeff B.; Akbarnia, Behrooz A.

In: Spine, Vol. 38, No. 16, 15.07.2013, p. 1368-1374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McElroy, MJ, Sponseller, PD, Fuhrhop, SK, Russell, CJ, Newton, PO, Marks, MC, Sanders, JO, Yazici, M, Pawelek, JB & Akbarnia, BA 2013, 'Clinically significant differences exist between curves in operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis', Spine, vol. 38, no. 16, pp. 1368-1374. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318294eb37
McElroy, Mark J. ; Sponseller, Paul David ; Fuhrhop, Sara K. ; Russell, Colin J. ; Newton, Peter O. ; Marks, Michelle C. ; Sanders, James O. ; Yazici, Muharrem ; Pawelek, Jeff B. ; Akbarnia, Behrooz A. / Clinically significant differences exist between curves in operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In: Spine. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 16. pp. 1368-1374.
@article{5d6b6aededb84392b0b7df33d005dbc5,
title = "Clinically significant differences exist between curves in operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE.: To determine if statistically significant differences exist between operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (IEOS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in primary curve characteristics, stable vertebra, kyphosis, or lumbar deformity and, if so, to identify the clinical significance of these differences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: To our knowledge, no study has statistically compared radiographical measures of operative IEOS and AIS. METHODS.: We identified operative patients (60, IEOS; 1537, AIS) in 2 multicenter databases and measured preoperative radiographical parameters of interest. The measurements were compared using the Student t test and other appropriate statistical methods (significance, P= 0.05). RESULTS.: The IEOS and AIS groups were significantly different in primary curve magnitude (70 ± 20 vs. 54 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001), stable vertebra location (L3.0 ± 1.4 vs. L2.1 ± 2.2, respectively; P= 0.001), and T2 to T12 kyphosis (40 ± 15 vs. 31 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001). Distribution of major curve apex was unimodal centered close to the thoracolumbar junction in IEOS versus bimodal in AIS. Primary curve type was thoracic in 83{\%} and 79{\%} and thoracolumbar/lumbar in 17{\%} and 21{\%} of patients with IEOS and AIS, respectively. When the overall cohorts were separated into curve types and these subsets were compared, statistically significant differences were found between IEOS and AIS in thoracic primary curves (apex, magnitude, direction, proximal and distal Cobb vertebrae, and lumbar deformity) and thoracolumbar/lumbar primary curves (magnitude). CONCLUSION.: Significant radiographical differences exist between operative IEOS and AIS curves. IEOS curves are greater in magnitude, more kyphotic, less well compensated, and have a more caudal apex and stable vertebra. These findings suggest that younger patients may require more distal instrumentation and that proximal fixation techniques should consider the additional pullout forces created by the greater kyphosis.Level of Evidence: 3",
keywords = "adolescent, early-onset, idiopathic, infantile, juvenile, Lenke, scoliosis",
author = "McElroy, {Mark J.} and Sponseller, {Paul David} and Fuhrhop, {Sara K.} and Russell, {Colin J.} and Newton, {Peter O.} and Marks, {Michelle C.} and Sanders, {James O.} and Muharrem Yazici and Pawelek, {Jeff B.} and Akbarnia, {Behrooz A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e318294eb37",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1368--1374",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinically significant differences exist between curves in operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

AU - McElroy, Mark J.

AU - Sponseller, Paul David

AU - Fuhrhop, Sara K.

AU - Russell, Colin J.

AU - Newton, Peter O.

AU - Marks, Michelle C.

AU - Sanders, James O.

AU - Yazici, Muharrem

AU - Pawelek, Jeff B.

AU - Akbarnia, Behrooz A.

PY - 2013/7/15

Y1 - 2013/7/15

N2 - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE.: To determine if statistically significant differences exist between operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (IEOS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in primary curve characteristics, stable vertebra, kyphosis, or lumbar deformity and, if so, to identify the clinical significance of these differences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: To our knowledge, no study has statistically compared radiographical measures of operative IEOS and AIS. METHODS.: We identified operative patients (60, IEOS; 1537, AIS) in 2 multicenter databases and measured preoperative radiographical parameters of interest. The measurements were compared using the Student t test and other appropriate statistical methods (significance, P= 0.05). RESULTS.: The IEOS and AIS groups were significantly different in primary curve magnitude (70 ± 20 vs. 54 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001), stable vertebra location (L3.0 ± 1.4 vs. L2.1 ± 2.2, respectively; P= 0.001), and T2 to T12 kyphosis (40 ± 15 vs. 31 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001). Distribution of major curve apex was unimodal centered close to the thoracolumbar junction in IEOS versus bimodal in AIS. Primary curve type was thoracic in 83% and 79% and thoracolumbar/lumbar in 17% and 21% of patients with IEOS and AIS, respectively. When the overall cohorts were separated into curve types and these subsets were compared, statistically significant differences were found between IEOS and AIS in thoracic primary curves (apex, magnitude, direction, proximal and distal Cobb vertebrae, and lumbar deformity) and thoracolumbar/lumbar primary curves (magnitude). CONCLUSION.: Significant radiographical differences exist between operative IEOS and AIS curves. IEOS curves are greater in magnitude, more kyphotic, less well compensated, and have a more caudal apex and stable vertebra. These findings suggest that younger patients may require more distal instrumentation and that proximal fixation techniques should consider the additional pullout forces created by the greater kyphosis.Level of Evidence: 3

AB - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE.: To determine if statistically significant differences exist between operative idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (IEOS) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in primary curve characteristics, stable vertebra, kyphosis, or lumbar deformity and, if so, to identify the clinical significance of these differences. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: To our knowledge, no study has statistically compared radiographical measures of operative IEOS and AIS. METHODS.: We identified operative patients (60, IEOS; 1537, AIS) in 2 multicenter databases and measured preoperative radiographical parameters of interest. The measurements were compared using the Student t test and other appropriate statistical methods (significance, P= 0.05). RESULTS.: The IEOS and AIS groups were significantly different in primary curve magnitude (70 ± 20 vs. 54 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001), stable vertebra location (L3.0 ± 1.4 vs. L2.1 ± 2.2, respectively; P= 0.001), and T2 to T12 kyphosis (40 ± 15 vs. 31 ± 13 , respectively; P<0.001). Distribution of major curve apex was unimodal centered close to the thoracolumbar junction in IEOS versus bimodal in AIS. Primary curve type was thoracic in 83% and 79% and thoracolumbar/lumbar in 17% and 21% of patients with IEOS and AIS, respectively. When the overall cohorts were separated into curve types and these subsets were compared, statistically significant differences were found between IEOS and AIS in thoracic primary curves (apex, magnitude, direction, proximal and distal Cobb vertebrae, and lumbar deformity) and thoracolumbar/lumbar primary curves (magnitude). CONCLUSION.: Significant radiographical differences exist between operative IEOS and AIS curves. IEOS curves are greater in magnitude, more kyphotic, less well compensated, and have a more caudal apex and stable vertebra. These findings suggest that younger patients may require more distal instrumentation and that proximal fixation techniques should consider the additional pullout forces created by the greater kyphosis.Level of Evidence: 3

KW - adolescent

KW - early-onset

KW - idiopathic

KW - infantile

KW - juvenile

KW - Lenke

KW - scoliosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880751861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880751861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318294eb37

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318294eb37

M3 - Article

C2 - 23574816

AN - SCOPUS:84880751861

VL - 38

SP - 1368

EP - 1374

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 16

ER -