Clinical psychology Ph.D. program rankings: Evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations

Johnny L. Matson, Carrie J. Malone, Melissa L. González, David R. McClure, Rinita B. Laud, Noha F. Minshawi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Program rankings and their visibility have taken on greater and greater significance. Rarely is the accuracy of these rankings, which are typically based on a small subset of university faculty impressions, questioned. This paper presents a more comprehensive survey method based on quantifiable measures of faculty publications and citations. The most frequently published core clinical faculty across 157 APA-approved clinical programs are listed. The implications of these data are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-513
Number of pages11
JournalResearch in Developmental Disabilities
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Keywords

  • Clinical psychology
  • Faculty publications
  • Program rankings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical psychology Ph.D. program rankings: Evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Matson, J. L., Malone, C. J., González, M. L., McClure, D. R., Laud, R. B., & Minshawi, N. F. (2005). Clinical psychology Ph.D. program rankings: Evaluating eminence on faculty publications and citations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26(6), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.09.003