Clinical interventions for venous leg ulcers: Proposals to improve the quality of clinical leg ulcer research

Gerald Sylvan Lazarus, Robert S. Kirsner, Jonathan Mark Zenilman, M. Frances Valle, David J. Margolis, Nicky Cullum, Vickie R. Driver, Lisa Gould, Ellie Lindsay, Sean Tunis, William Marston, Eric B Bass, William Ennis, Jeffrey Davidson, Jeremy Bowden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present status of clinical leg ulcer healing research was reviewed by 25 experts over 2 days on September 28 and 29, 2015. Multiple clinical effectiveness reviews were presented suggesting that published clinical wound healing research often does not meet present (2015) evidence based standards. Specific areas requiring remediation were highlighted and approaches to overcoming existing challenges were proposed. Participants using anonymous voting technology developed an action plan to resolve perceived deficiencies. Statements were accepted if 75% of participants agreed. Older patients with a high frequency of comorbid conditions posed particular difficulties in designing clinical research protocols and better diagnostic categorization is necessary A standardized model template for collecting information about diagnosis and evaluation of the effect of interventions on healing of all types of leg ulcers was considered a high priority. Such a model template could be modified depending on the specific etiology of the leg ulcers. Generally agreed on quantifiable standards to establish degree of morbidity was considered a high priority. There was universal agreement that sources of funding and conflicts of interest needed to be disclosed in presentations and all publications. All clinical research studies should be registered with appropriate authorities. There was substantial enthusiasm for a clinical research network with quality standards for membership and an advisory research core available to investigators. Such a network should be funded and actively managed to insure long-term viability. The governance of such an entity needs to be established by the wound care community. The present trend to integrate patients into the clinical research process was endorsed and there was enthusiasm to develop patient advocacy for wound healing research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)767-774
Number of pages8
JournalWound Repair and Regeneration
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2016

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this