TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical indications for hysterectomy route
T2 - Patient characteristics or physician preference?
AU - Dorsey, James H.
AU - Steinberg, Earl P.
AU - Holtz, Patrice M.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Department of Gynecology,~ and the Institute for Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgery,b Greater Baltimore Medical Center, the Johns Hopkins Program for Medical Technology and Practice Assessment/and Health Technology Associates, Inc. ~ Supported by the Institute for Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgery at the Greater Baltimore Medical Center. Presented at the Forty-second Annual Meeting of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Orlando, Florida, May 11, 1994. Received for publication November 28, 1994; revised January 18, 1995; accepted March 7, 1995. Reprint requests:James Dorsey, MD, Chairman of the Department of Gynecology, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, 6569 N. Charles St., Suite 307, Baltimore, MD 21204. Copyright © 1995 by Mosby-Year Book, Inc. 0002-9378/95 $5.00 + 0 6/1/64632
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to compare the indications, characteristics, surgical management, and outcomes of patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and to assess whether patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy might have been candidates for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysteretomy and whether patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy might have been candidates for total vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: The hospital charts of 502 women who underwent elective inpatient hysterectomy at a single large general hospital between January 1992 and November 1993 were abstracted retrospectively by use of a structured data abstraction instrument. The study included patients operated on by 16 different experienced gynecologists. Data were collected regarding patient demographic characteristics, clinical history and preoperative physical examination, indications for surgery, route of hysterectomy, intraoperative findings, pathologic study results, and outcomes in the immediate postoperative hospitalization period. RESULTS: Patient age, race, weight, parity, and previous surgical history were significantly associated with hysterectomy type. Although no nulliparous patients and no patients with a uterine size estimated preoperatively to be > 12 weeks of gestation underwent total vaginal hysterectomy, 16.6% and 30.6% of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy patients had these characteristics, respectively. A total of 6.6% of total abdominal hysterectomy cases and 16.7% of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy cases lacked an obvious justification for an abdominal procedure. On average, surgical time was 23 minutes longer for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy than for total abdominal hysterectomy and 30 minutes longer for total abdominal hysterectomy than for total vaginal hysterectomy. When uterine size or configuration impaired access to uterine vessels, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy was difficult to perform. Postoperative morbidity was similar across the three procedures, but average length of hospital stay was 2.6 days, 3.5 days, and 4.4 days for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some consistent and statistically significant differences in the characteristics of patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy is enabling many patients to avoid total abdominal hysterectomy. However, many patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy could probably undergo total vaginal hysterectomy instead. Clinical outcomes were similar regardless of type of hysterectomy performed. Practice style and personal preference of the surgeon thus may be playing a significant role in selection of hysterectomy type. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy becomes technically difficult and conversion to total abdominal hysterectomy is more frequent when uterine size or configuration impairs access to uterine vessels.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to compare the indications, characteristics, surgical management, and outcomes of patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and to assess whether patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy might have been candidates for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysteretomy and whether patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy might have been candidates for total vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: The hospital charts of 502 women who underwent elective inpatient hysterectomy at a single large general hospital between January 1992 and November 1993 were abstracted retrospectively by use of a structured data abstraction instrument. The study included patients operated on by 16 different experienced gynecologists. Data were collected regarding patient demographic characteristics, clinical history and preoperative physical examination, indications for surgery, route of hysterectomy, intraoperative findings, pathologic study results, and outcomes in the immediate postoperative hospitalization period. RESULTS: Patient age, race, weight, parity, and previous surgical history were significantly associated with hysterectomy type. Although no nulliparous patients and no patients with a uterine size estimated preoperatively to be > 12 weeks of gestation underwent total vaginal hysterectomy, 16.6% and 30.6% of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy patients had these characteristics, respectively. A total of 6.6% of total abdominal hysterectomy cases and 16.7% of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy cases lacked an obvious justification for an abdominal procedure. On average, surgical time was 23 minutes longer for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy than for total abdominal hysterectomy and 30 minutes longer for total abdominal hysterectomy than for total vaginal hysterectomy. When uterine size or configuration impaired access to uterine vessels, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy was difficult to perform. Postoperative morbidity was similar across the three procedures, but average length of hospital stay was 2.6 days, 3.5 days, and 4.4 days for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total vaginal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are some consistent and statistically significant differences in the characteristics of patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy is enabling many patients to avoid total abdominal hysterectomy. However, many patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy could probably undergo total vaginal hysterectomy instead. Clinical outcomes were similar regardless of type of hysterectomy performed. Practice style and personal preference of the surgeon thus may be playing a significant role in selection of hysterectomy type. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy becomes technically difficult and conversion to total abdominal hysterectomy is more frequent when uterine size or configuration impairs access to uterine vessels.
KW - Hysterectomy route
KW - practice style
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028818159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028818159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90632-0
DO - 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90632-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 7503184
AN - SCOPUS:0028818159
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 173
SP - 1452
EP - 1460
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 5
ER -