Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children

D. M. Escolar, E. K. Henricson, J. Mayhew, J. Florence, R. Leshner, K. M. Patel, P. R. Clemens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Measurements of muscle strength in clinical trials of duchenne muscular dystrophy have relied heavily on manual muscle testing (MMT). The high level of intra- and interrater variability of MMT compromises clinical study results. We compared the reliability of 12 clinical evaluators in performing MMT and quantitative muscle testing (QMT) on 12 children with muscular dystrophy. QMT was reliable, with an interclass correlation coefficient (icc) of >0.9 for biceps and grip strength, and >0.8 for quadriceps strength. Training of both subjects and evaluators was easily accomplished. MMT was not as reliable, and required repeated training of evaluators to bring all groups to an Icc >0.75 for shoulder abduction, elbow and hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. We conclude that QMT shows greater reliability and is easier to implement than MMT. Consequently, QMT will be a superior measure of strength for use in pediatric, neuromuscular, multicenter clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)787-793
Number of pages7
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Muscles
Clinical Trials
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Muscular Dystrophies
Muscle Strength
Hand Strength
Elbow
Ankle
Multicenter Studies
Hip
Knee
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Duchenne
  • Dystrophy
  • Intrarater reliability
  • Manual muscle testing (MMT)
  • Pediatric neuromuscular testing
  • Quantitative muscle testing (QMT)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Escolar, D. M., Henricson, E. K., Mayhew, J., Florence, J., Leshner, R., Patel, K. M., & Clemens, P. R. (2001). Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children. Muscle and Nerve, 24(6), 787-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.1070

Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children. / Escolar, D. M.; Henricson, E. K.; Mayhew, J.; Florence, J.; Leshner, R.; Patel, K. M.; Clemens, P. R.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2001, p. 787-793.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Escolar, DM, Henricson, EK, Mayhew, J, Florence, J, Leshner, R, Patel, KM & Clemens, PR 2001, 'Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children', Muscle and Nerve, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 787-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.1070
Escolar, D. M. ; Henricson, E. K. ; Mayhew, J. ; Florence, J. ; Leshner, R. ; Patel, K. M. ; Clemens, P. R. / Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children. In: Muscle and Nerve. 2001 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 787-793.
@article{711bd1b348334d138d6869e3dd4d837e,
title = "Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children",
abstract = "Measurements of muscle strength in clinical trials of duchenne muscular dystrophy have relied heavily on manual muscle testing (MMT). The high level of intra- and interrater variability of MMT compromises clinical study results. We compared the reliability of 12 clinical evaluators in performing MMT and quantitative muscle testing (QMT) on 12 children with muscular dystrophy. QMT was reliable, with an interclass correlation coefficient (icc) of >0.9 for biceps and grip strength, and >0.8 for quadriceps strength. Training of both subjects and evaluators was easily accomplished. MMT was not as reliable, and required repeated training of evaluators to bring all groups to an Icc >0.75 for shoulder abduction, elbow and hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. We conclude that QMT shows greater reliability and is easier to implement than MMT. Consequently, QMT will be a superior measure of strength for use in pediatric, neuromuscular, multicenter clinical trials.",
keywords = "Duchenne, Dystrophy, Intrarater reliability, Manual muscle testing (MMT), Pediatric neuromuscular testing, Quantitative muscle testing (QMT)",
author = "Escolar, {D. M.} and Henricson, {E. K.} and J. Mayhew and J. Florence and R. Leshner and Patel, {K. M.} and Clemens, {P. R.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1002/mus.1070",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "787--793",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical evaluator reliability for quantitative and manual muscle testing measures of strength in children

AU - Escolar, D. M.

AU - Henricson, E. K.

AU - Mayhew, J.

AU - Florence, J.

AU - Leshner, R.

AU - Patel, K. M.

AU - Clemens, P. R.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Measurements of muscle strength in clinical trials of duchenne muscular dystrophy have relied heavily on manual muscle testing (MMT). The high level of intra- and interrater variability of MMT compromises clinical study results. We compared the reliability of 12 clinical evaluators in performing MMT and quantitative muscle testing (QMT) on 12 children with muscular dystrophy. QMT was reliable, with an interclass correlation coefficient (icc) of >0.9 for biceps and grip strength, and >0.8 for quadriceps strength. Training of both subjects and evaluators was easily accomplished. MMT was not as reliable, and required repeated training of evaluators to bring all groups to an Icc >0.75 for shoulder abduction, elbow and hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. We conclude that QMT shows greater reliability and is easier to implement than MMT. Consequently, QMT will be a superior measure of strength for use in pediatric, neuromuscular, multicenter clinical trials.

AB - Measurements of muscle strength in clinical trials of duchenne muscular dystrophy have relied heavily on manual muscle testing (MMT). The high level of intra- and interrater variability of MMT compromises clinical study results. We compared the reliability of 12 clinical evaluators in performing MMT and quantitative muscle testing (QMT) on 12 children with muscular dystrophy. QMT was reliable, with an interclass correlation coefficient (icc) of >0.9 for biceps and grip strength, and >0.8 for quadriceps strength. Training of both subjects and evaluators was easily accomplished. MMT was not as reliable, and required repeated training of evaluators to bring all groups to an Icc >0.75 for shoulder abduction, elbow and hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion. We conclude that QMT shows greater reliability and is easier to implement than MMT. Consequently, QMT will be a superior measure of strength for use in pediatric, neuromuscular, multicenter clinical trials.

KW - Duchenne

KW - Dystrophy

KW - Intrarater reliability

KW - Manual muscle testing (MMT)

KW - Pediatric neuromuscular testing

KW - Quantitative muscle testing (QMT)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035012607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035012607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.1070

DO - 10.1002/mus.1070

M3 - Article

C2 - 11360262

AN - SCOPUS:0035012607

VL - 24

SP - 787

EP - 793

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 6

ER -