Clinical application of the FACES score for face transplantation

Karan Chopra, Srinivas M. Susarla, Danielle Goodrich, Steven Bernard, James E. Zins, Frank Papay, W P Andrew Lee, Chad R Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate all reported outcomes of facial allotransplantation (FT) using the previously described FACES scoring instrument. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all consecutive face transplants to date (January 2012). Candidates were identified using medical and general internet database searches. Medical literature and media reports were reviewed for details regarding demographic, operative, anatomic, and psychosocial data, which were then used to formulate FACES scores. Pre-transplant and post-transplant scores for "functional status", "aesthetic deformity", "co-morbidities", "exposed tissue", and "surgical history" were calculated. Scores were statistically compared using paired-samples analyses. Results: Twenty consecutive patients were identified, with 18 surviving recipients. The sample was composed of 3 females and 17 males, with a mean age of 35.0 ± 11.0 years (range: 19-57 years). Overall, data reporting for functional parameters was poor. Six subjects had complete pre-transplant and post-transplant data available for all 5 FACES domains. The mean pre-transplant FACES score was 33.5 ± 8.8 (range: 23-44); the mean post-transplant score was 21.5 ± 5.9 (range: 14-32) and was statistically significantly lower than the pre-transplant score (P = 0.02). Among the individual domains, FT conferred a statistically significant improvement in aesthetic defect scores and exposed tissue scores (P ≤ 0.01) while, at the same time, it displayed no significant increases in co-morbidity (P = 0.17). Conclusion: There is a significant deficiency in functional outcome reports thus far. Moreover, FT resulted in improved overall FACES score, with the most dramatic improvements noted in aesthetic defect and exposed tissue scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-69
Number of pages6
JournalThe Journal of craniofacial surgery
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Facial Transplantation
Transplants
Esthetics
Morbidity
Internet
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
History
Demography
Databases

Keywords

  • Face transplant
  • FACES score
  • facial reconstruction
  • functional outcome
  • maxillofacial allotransplantation
  • psychosocial stability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Clinical application of the FACES score for face transplantation. / Chopra, Karan; Susarla, Srinivas M.; Goodrich, Danielle; Bernard, Steven; Zins, James E.; Papay, Frank; Lee, W P Andrew; Gordon, Chad R.

In: The Journal of craniofacial surgery, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 64-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chopra, K, Susarla, SM, Goodrich, D, Bernard, S, Zins, JE, Papay, F, Lee, WPA & Gordon, CR 2014, 'Clinical application of the FACES score for face transplantation', The Journal of craniofacial surgery, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2dda9
Chopra, Karan ; Susarla, Srinivas M. ; Goodrich, Danielle ; Bernard, Steven ; Zins, James E. ; Papay, Frank ; Lee, W P Andrew ; Gordon, Chad R. / Clinical application of the FACES score for face transplantation. In: The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 64-69.
@article{87bd0b83f0a34994aa106fe8b1fb1b04,
title = "Clinical application of the FACES score for face transplantation",
abstract = "Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate all reported outcomes of facial allotransplantation (FT) using the previously described FACES scoring instrument. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all consecutive face transplants to date (January 2012). Candidates were identified using medical and general internet database searches. Medical literature and media reports were reviewed for details regarding demographic, operative, anatomic, and psychosocial data, which were then used to formulate FACES scores. Pre-transplant and post-transplant scores for {"}functional status{"}, {"}aesthetic deformity{"}, {"}co-morbidities{"}, {"}exposed tissue{"}, and {"}surgical history{"} were calculated. Scores were statistically compared using paired-samples analyses. Results: Twenty consecutive patients were identified, with 18 surviving recipients. The sample was composed of 3 females and 17 males, with a mean age of 35.0 ± 11.0 years (range: 19-57 years). Overall, data reporting for functional parameters was poor. Six subjects had complete pre-transplant and post-transplant data available for all 5 FACES domains. The mean pre-transplant FACES score was 33.5 ± 8.8 (range: 23-44); the mean post-transplant score was 21.5 ± 5.9 (range: 14-32) and was statistically significantly lower than the pre-transplant score (P = 0.02). Among the individual domains, FT conferred a statistically significant improvement in aesthetic defect scores and exposed tissue scores (P ≤ 0.01) while, at the same time, it displayed no significant increases in co-morbidity (P = 0.17). Conclusion: There is a significant deficiency in functional outcome reports thus far. Moreover, FT resulted in improved overall FACES score, with the most dramatic improvements noted in aesthetic defect and exposed tissue scores.",
keywords = "Face transplant, FACES score, facial reconstruction, functional outcome, maxillofacial allotransplantation, psychosocial stability",
author = "Karan Chopra and Susarla, {Srinivas M.} and Danielle Goodrich and Steven Bernard and Zins, {James E.} and Frank Papay and Lee, {W P Andrew} and Gordon, {Chad R}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2dda9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "64--69",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical application of the FACES score for face transplantation

AU - Chopra, Karan

AU - Susarla, Srinivas M.

AU - Goodrich, Danielle

AU - Bernard, Steven

AU - Zins, James E.

AU - Papay, Frank

AU - Lee, W P Andrew

AU - Gordon, Chad R

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate all reported outcomes of facial allotransplantation (FT) using the previously described FACES scoring instrument. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all consecutive face transplants to date (January 2012). Candidates were identified using medical and general internet database searches. Medical literature and media reports were reviewed for details regarding demographic, operative, anatomic, and psychosocial data, which were then used to formulate FACES scores. Pre-transplant and post-transplant scores for "functional status", "aesthetic deformity", "co-morbidities", "exposed tissue", and "surgical history" were calculated. Scores were statistically compared using paired-samples analyses. Results: Twenty consecutive patients were identified, with 18 surviving recipients. The sample was composed of 3 females and 17 males, with a mean age of 35.0 ± 11.0 years (range: 19-57 years). Overall, data reporting for functional parameters was poor. Six subjects had complete pre-transplant and post-transplant data available for all 5 FACES domains. The mean pre-transplant FACES score was 33.5 ± 8.8 (range: 23-44); the mean post-transplant score was 21.5 ± 5.9 (range: 14-32) and was statistically significantly lower than the pre-transplant score (P = 0.02). Among the individual domains, FT conferred a statistically significant improvement in aesthetic defect scores and exposed tissue scores (P ≤ 0.01) while, at the same time, it displayed no significant increases in co-morbidity (P = 0.17). Conclusion: There is a significant deficiency in functional outcome reports thus far. Moreover, FT resulted in improved overall FACES score, with the most dramatic improvements noted in aesthetic defect and exposed tissue scores.

AB - Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate all reported outcomes of facial allotransplantation (FT) using the previously described FACES scoring instrument. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all consecutive face transplants to date (January 2012). Candidates were identified using medical and general internet database searches. Medical literature and media reports were reviewed for details regarding demographic, operative, anatomic, and psychosocial data, which were then used to formulate FACES scores. Pre-transplant and post-transplant scores for "functional status", "aesthetic deformity", "co-morbidities", "exposed tissue", and "surgical history" were calculated. Scores were statistically compared using paired-samples analyses. Results: Twenty consecutive patients were identified, with 18 surviving recipients. The sample was composed of 3 females and 17 males, with a mean age of 35.0 ± 11.0 years (range: 19-57 years). Overall, data reporting for functional parameters was poor. Six subjects had complete pre-transplant and post-transplant data available for all 5 FACES domains. The mean pre-transplant FACES score was 33.5 ± 8.8 (range: 23-44); the mean post-transplant score was 21.5 ± 5.9 (range: 14-32) and was statistically significantly lower than the pre-transplant score (P = 0.02). Among the individual domains, FT conferred a statistically significant improvement in aesthetic defect scores and exposed tissue scores (P ≤ 0.01) while, at the same time, it displayed no significant increases in co-morbidity (P = 0.17). Conclusion: There is a significant deficiency in functional outcome reports thus far. Moreover, FT resulted in improved overall FACES score, with the most dramatic improvements noted in aesthetic defect and exposed tissue scores.

KW - Face transplant

KW - FACES score

KW - facial reconstruction

KW - functional outcome

KW - maxillofacial allotransplantation

KW - psychosocial stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895908040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895908040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2dda9

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2dda9

M3 - Article

C2 - 24240764

AN - SCOPUS:84895908040

VL - 25

SP - 64

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 1

ER -