Classification of intellectual disability using the wechsler intelligence scale for children

Full scale IQ or general abilities index?

Taylor A. Koriakin, Mark D. Mccurdy, Aimilia Papazoglou, Alison E. Pritchard, Theodore A Zabel, Ernest M Mahone, Lisa Anne Jacobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: We examined the implications of using the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) versus the General Abilities Index (GAI) for determination of intellectual disability using the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV). Method: Children referred for neuropsychological assessment (543 males, 290 females; mean age 10y 5mo, SD 2y 9mo, range 6-16y) were administered the WISC-IV and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, second edition (ABAS-II). Results: GAI and FSIQ were highly correlated; however, fewer children were identified as having intellectual disability using GAI (n=159) than when using FSIQ (n=196). Although the 44 children classified as having intellectual disability based upon FSIQ (but not GAI) had significantly higher adaptive functioning scores than those meeting intellectual disability criteria based upon both FSIQ and GAI, mean adaptive scores still fell within the impaired range. FSIQ and GAI were comparable in predicting impairments in adaptive functioning. Interpretation: Using GAI rather than FSIQ in intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making resulted in fewer individuals being diagnosed with intellectual disability; however, the mean GAI of the disqualified individuals was at the upper end of criteria for intellectual impairment (standard score 75), and these individuals remained adaptively impaired. As GAI and FSIQ were similarly predictive of overall adaptive functioning, the use of GAI for intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making may be of limited value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)840-845
Number of pages6
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume55
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Wechsler Scales
Aptitude
Intelligence
Intellectual Disability
Decision Making
Psychological Adaptation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Classification of intellectual disability using the wechsler intelligence scale for children : Full scale IQ or general abilities index? / Koriakin, Taylor A.; Mccurdy, Mark D.; Papazoglou, Aimilia; Pritchard, Alison E.; Zabel, Theodore A; Mahone, Ernest M; Jacobson, Lisa Anne.

In: Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, Vol. 55, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 840-845.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8eb5c7e49c2a422093cd2004180b4166,
title = "Classification of intellectual disability using the wechsler intelligence scale for children: Full scale IQ or general abilities index?",
abstract = "Aim: We examined the implications of using the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) versus the General Abilities Index (GAI) for determination of intellectual disability using the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV). Method: Children referred for neuropsychological assessment (543 males, 290 females; mean age 10y 5mo, SD 2y 9mo, range 6-16y) were administered the WISC-IV and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, second edition (ABAS-II). Results: GAI and FSIQ were highly correlated; however, fewer children were identified as having intellectual disability using GAI (n=159) than when using FSIQ (n=196). Although the 44 children classified as having intellectual disability based upon FSIQ (but not GAI) had significantly higher adaptive functioning scores than those meeting intellectual disability criteria based upon both FSIQ and GAI, mean adaptive scores still fell within the impaired range. FSIQ and GAI were comparable in predicting impairments in adaptive functioning. Interpretation: Using GAI rather than FSIQ in intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making resulted in fewer individuals being diagnosed with intellectual disability; however, the mean GAI of the disqualified individuals was at the upper end of criteria for intellectual impairment (standard score 75), and these individuals remained adaptively impaired. As GAI and FSIQ were similarly predictive of overall adaptive functioning, the use of GAI for intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making may be of limited value.",
author = "Koriakin, {Taylor A.} and Mccurdy, {Mark D.} and Aimilia Papazoglou and Pritchard, {Alison E.} and Zabel, {Theodore A} and Mahone, {Ernest M} and Jacobson, {Lisa Anne}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/dmcn.12201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "840--845",
journal = "Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology",
issn = "0012-1622",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of intellectual disability using the wechsler intelligence scale for children

T2 - Full scale IQ or general abilities index?

AU - Koriakin, Taylor A.

AU - Mccurdy, Mark D.

AU - Papazoglou, Aimilia

AU - Pritchard, Alison E.

AU - Zabel, Theodore A

AU - Mahone, Ernest M

AU - Jacobson, Lisa Anne

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Aim: We examined the implications of using the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) versus the General Abilities Index (GAI) for determination of intellectual disability using the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV). Method: Children referred for neuropsychological assessment (543 males, 290 females; mean age 10y 5mo, SD 2y 9mo, range 6-16y) were administered the WISC-IV and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, second edition (ABAS-II). Results: GAI and FSIQ were highly correlated; however, fewer children were identified as having intellectual disability using GAI (n=159) than when using FSIQ (n=196). Although the 44 children classified as having intellectual disability based upon FSIQ (but not GAI) had significantly higher adaptive functioning scores than those meeting intellectual disability criteria based upon both FSIQ and GAI, mean adaptive scores still fell within the impaired range. FSIQ and GAI were comparable in predicting impairments in adaptive functioning. Interpretation: Using GAI rather than FSIQ in intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making resulted in fewer individuals being diagnosed with intellectual disability; however, the mean GAI of the disqualified individuals was at the upper end of criteria for intellectual impairment (standard score 75), and these individuals remained adaptively impaired. As GAI and FSIQ were similarly predictive of overall adaptive functioning, the use of GAI for intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making may be of limited value.

AB - Aim: We examined the implications of using the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) versus the General Abilities Index (GAI) for determination of intellectual disability using the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV). Method: Children referred for neuropsychological assessment (543 males, 290 females; mean age 10y 5mo, SD 2y 9mo, range 6-16y) were administered the WISC-IV and the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, second edition (ABAS-II). Results: GAI and FSIQ were highly correlated; however, fewer children were identified as having intellectual disability using GAI (n=159) than when using FSIQ (n=196). Although the 44 children classified as having intellectual disability based upon FSIQ (but not GAI) had significantly higher adaptive functioning scores than those meeting intellectual disability criteria based upon both FSIQ and GAI, mean adaptive scores still fell within the impaired range. FSIQ and GAI were comparable in predicting impairments in adaptive functioning. Interpretation: Using GAI rather than FSIQ in intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making resulted in fewer individuals being diagnosed with intellectual disability; however, the mean GAI of the disqualified individuals was at the upper end of criteria for intellectual impairment (standard score 75), and these individuals remained adaptively impaired. As GAI and FSIQ were similarly predictive of overall adaptive functioning, the use of GAI for intellectual disability diagnostic decision-making may be of limited value.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881549648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881549648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/dmcn.12201

DO - 10.1111/dmcn.12201

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 840

EP - 845

JO - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

JF - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

SN - 0012-1622

IS - 9

ER -