Chronic care improvement in primary care: Evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes

Peter J. Fagan, Alyson B. Schuster, Cynthia Boyd, Jill A Marsteller, Michael Griswold, Shannon M E Murphy, Linda Dunbar, Christopher B. Forrest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To examine the effects of an intervention comprising (1) a practice-based care coordination program, (2) augmented by pay for performance (P4P) for meeting quality targets, and (3) complemented by a third-party disease management on quality of care and resource use for older adults with diabetes. Data Sources/Study Setting. Claims files of a managed care organization (MCO) for 20,943 adults aged 65 and older with diabetes receiving care in Alabama, Tennessee, or Texas, from January 2004 to March 2007. Study Design. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal study in which pre- and postdata from 1,587 patients in nine intervention primary care practices were evaluated against 19,356 patients in MCO comparison practices (>900). Five incentivized quality measures, two nonincentivized measures, and two resource-use measures were investigated. We examined trends and changes in trends from baseline to follow-up, contrasting intervention and comparison group member results. Principal Findings. Quality of care generally improved for both groups during the study period. Only slight differences were seen between the intervention and comparison group trends and changes in trends over time. Conclusions. This study did not generate evidence supporting a beneficial effect of an on-site care coordination intervention augmented by P4P and complemented by third-party disease management on diabetes quality or resource use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1763-1782
Number of pages20
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume45
Issue number6 PART 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Incentive Reimbursement
Quality of Health Care
Managed Care Programs
Disease Management
Primary Health Care
Organizations
Information Storage and Retrieval
Longitudinal Studies
Non-Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • care management
  • evaluation design
  • longitudinal study
  • outcomes measurement
  • Pay for performance
  • primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Chronic care improvement in primary care : Evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes. / Fagan, Peter J.; Schuster, Alyson B.; Boyd, Cynthia; Marsteller, Jill A; Griswold, Michael; Murphy, Shannon M E; Dunbar, Linda; Forrest, Christopher B.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 45, No. 6 PART 1, 12.2010, p. 1763-1782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fagan, Peter J. ; Schuster, Alyson B. ; Boyd, Cynthia ; Marsteller, Jill A ; Griswold, Michael ; Murphy, Shannon M E ; Dunbar, Linda ; Forrest, Christopher B. / Chronic care improvement in primary care : Evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes. In: Health Services Research. 2010 ; Vol. 45, No. 6 PART 1. pp. 1763-1782.
@article{26c3b5cc59e449c885d8f4f338e6ffa1,
title = "Chronic care improvement in primary care: Evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes",
abstract = "Objective. To examine the effects of an intervention comprising (1) a practice-based care coordination program, (2) augmented by pay for performance (P4P) for meeting quality targets, and (3) complemented by a third-party disease management on quality of care and resource use for older adults with diabetes. Data Sources/Study Setting. Claims files of a managed care organization (MCO) for 20,943 adults aged 65 and older with diabetes receiving care in Alabama, Tennessee, or Texas, from January 2004 to March 2007. Study Design. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal study in which pre- and postdata from 1,587 patients in nine intervention primary care practices were evaluated against 19,356 patients in MCO comparison practices (>900). Five incentivized quality measures, two nonincentivized measures, and two resource-use measures were investigated. We examined trends and changes in trends from baseline to follow-up, contrasting intervention and comparison group member results. Principal Findings. Quality of care generally improved for both groups during the study period. Only slight differences were seen between the intervention and comparison group trends and changes in trends over time. Conclusions. This study did not generate evidence supporting a beneficial effect of an on-site care coordination intervention augmented by P4P and complemented by third-party disease management on diabetes quality or resource use.",
keywords = "care management, evaluation design, longitudinal study, outcomes measurement, Pay for performance, primary care",
author = "Fagan, {Peter J.} and Schuster, {Alyson B.} and Cynthia Boyd and Marsteller, {Jill A} and Michael Griswold and Murphy, {Shannon M E} and Linda Dunbar and Forrest, {Christopher B.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01166.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "1763--1782",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chronic care improvement in primary care

T2 - Evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes

AU - Fagan, Peter J.

AU - Schuster, Alyson B.

AU - Boyd, Cynthia

AU - Marsteller, Jill A

AU - Griswold, Michael

AU - Murphy, Shannon M E

AU - Dunbar, Linda

AU - Forrest, Christopher B.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Objective. To examine the effects of an intervention comprising (1) a practice-based care coordination program, (2) augmented by pay for performance (P4P) for meeting quality targets, and (3) complemented by a third-party disease management on quality of care and resource use for older adults with diabetes. Data Sources/Study Setting. Claims files of a managed care organization (MCO) for 20,943 adults aged 65 and older with diabetes receiving care in Alabama, Tennessee, or Texas, from January 2004 to March 2007. Study Design. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal study in which pre- and postdata from 1,587 patients in nine intervention primary care practices were evaluated against 19,356 patients in MCO comparison practices (>900). Five incentivized quality measures, two nonincentivized measures, and two resource-use measures were investigated. We examined trends and changes in trends from baseline to follow-up, contrasting intervention and comparison group member results. Principal Findings. Quality of care generally improved for both groups during the study period. Only slight differences were seen between the intervention and comparison group trends and changes in trends over time. Conclusions. This study did not generate evidence supporting a beneficial effect of an on-site care coordination intervention augmented by P4P and complemented by third-party disease management on diabetes quality or resource use.

AB - Objective. To examine the effects of an intervention comprising (1) a practice-based care coordination program, (2) augmented by pay for performance (P4P) for meeting quality targets, and (3) complemented by a third-party disease management on quality of care and resource use for older adults with diabetes. Data Sources/Study Setting. Claims files of a managed care organization (MCO) for 20,943 adults aged 65 and older with diabetes receiving care in Alabama, Tennessee, or Texas, from January 2004 to March 2007. Study Design. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal study in which pre- and postdata from 1,587 patients in nine intervention primary care practices were evaluated against 19,356 patients in MCO comparison practices (>900). Five incentivized quality measures, two nonincentivized measures, and two resource-use measures were investigated. We examined trends and changes in trends from baseline to follow-up, contrasting intervention and comparison group member results. Principal Findings. Quality of care generally improved for both groups during the study period. Only slight differences were seen between the intervention and comparison group trends and changes in trends over time. Conclusions. This study did not generate evidence supporting a beneficial effect of an on-site care coordination intervention augmented by P4P and complemented by third-party disease management on diabetes quality or resource use.

KW - care management

KW - evaluation design

KW - longitudinal study

KW - outcomes measurement

KW - Pay for performance

KW - primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449274258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449274258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01166.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01166.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20849553

AN - SCOPUS:78449274258

VL - 45

SP - 1763

EP - 1782

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 6 PART 1

ER -