Chlorhexidine gel versus aqueous for preventive use on umbilical stump: A randomized noninferiority trial

Stephen Hodgins, Kusum Thapa, Leela Khanal, Shilu Aryal, Bal Krishna Suvedi, Urmilla Baidya, Luke C Mullany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Recent trials of chlorhexidine cord cleansing have employed aqueous solution applied with cotton swabs. Care-takers may prefer gel, resulting in better compliance when implemented at large scale. We examined whether a guar-gum-thickened formulation was at least as efficacious as aqueous in reducing periumbilical flora. Methods: Newborns (n = 694) from normal deliveries at a hospital in Kathmandu were randomly allocated to cord cleansing with either gel or aqueous chlorhexidine, applied by finger. Immediately before and 24 hours after cleansing, periumbilical swabs were collected and cultured. The primary outcome was periumbilical colonization at 24 hours. Household-level acceptability and ease of use in a rural setting where most deliveries are not attended by health workers were assessed by providing 61 women with either gel or aqueous formulations and following up on their experience using the products. Results: Babies allocated to gel and aqueous chlorhexidine were comparable on a range of variables measured at baseline. At 24 hours postapplication, 4.6% (15 of 327) of cultures were positive in the gel group and 10.7% (35 of 326) in the aqueous group. The absolute difference in rates (gel minus aqueous) was -6.1% (95% CI: -10.2%, -2.1%). The acceptability study found that satisfaction and compliance were high for both; use of either largely displaced the traditional use of oil-based mixtures. Overall, there was a preference for gel. Conclusions: The gel formulation was not inferior to aqueous and gel reduced bacterial colonization to a greater degree. A gel formulation might be considered in future research or program settings where chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord is being evaluated or promoted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1003
Number of pages5
JournalPediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Umbilicus
Chlorhexidine
Gels
guar gum
Compliance
Fingers
Oils
Newborn Infant

Keywords

  • Equivalence study
  • neonatal sepsis
  • Nepal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Chlorhexidine gel versus aqueous for preventive use on umbilical stump : A randomized noninferiority trial. / Hodgins, Stephen; Thapa, Kusum; Khanal, Leela; Aryal, Shilu; Suvedi, Bal Krishna; Baidya, Urmilla; Mullany, Luke C.

In: Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, Vol. 29, No. 11, 11.2010, p. 999-1003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hodgins, Stephen ; Thapa, Kusum ; Khanal, Leela ; Aryal, Shilu ; Suvedi, Bal Krishna ; Baidya, Urmilla ; Mullany, Luke C. / Chlorhexidine gel versus aqueous for preventive use on umbilical stump : A randomized noninferiority trial. In: Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2010 ; Vol. 29, No. 11. pp. 999-1003.
@article{ae7f5c444a84403e8bfb69f614add10d,
title = "Chlorhexidine gel versus aqueous for preventive use on umbilical stump: A randomized noninferiority trial",
abstract = "Background: Recent trials of chlorhexidine cord cleansing have employed aqueous solution applied with cotton swabs. Care-takers may prefer gel, resulting in better compliance when implemented at large scale. We examined whether a guar-gum-thickened formulation was at least as efficacious as aqueous in reducing periumbilical flora. Methods: Newborns (n = 694) from normal deliveries at a hospital in Kathmandu were randomly allocated to cord cleansing with either gel or aqueous chlorhexidine, applied by finger. Immediately before and 24 hours after cleansing, periumbilical swabs were collected and cultured. The primary outcome was periumbilical colonization at 24 hours. Household-level acceptability and ease of use in a rural setting where most deliveries are not attended by health workers were assessed by providing 61 women with either gel or aqueous formulations and following up on their experience using the products. Results: Babies allocated to gel and aqueous chlorhexidine were comparable on a range of variables measured at baseline. At 24 hours postapplication, 4.6{\%} (15 of 327) of cultures were positive in the gel group and 10.7{\%} (35 of 326) in the aqueous group. The absolute difference in rates (gel minus aqueous) was -6.1{\%} (95{\%} CI: -10.2{\%}, -2.1{\%}). The acceptability study found that satisfaction and compliance were high for both; use of either largely displaced the traditional use of oil-based mixtures. Overall, there was a preference for gel. Conclusions: The gel formulation was not inferior to aqueous and gel reduced bacterial colonization to a greater degree. A gel formulation might be considered in future research or program settings where chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord is being evaluated or promoted.",
keywords = "Equivalence study, neonatal sepsis, Nepal",
author = "Stephen Hodgins and Kusum Thapa and Leela Khanal and Shilu Aryal and Suvedi, {Bal Krishna} and Urmilla Baidya and Mullany, {Luke C}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/INF.0b013e3181e70c59",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "999--1003",
journal = "Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal",
issn = "0891-3668",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chlorhexidine gel versus aqueous for preventive use on umbilical stump

T2 - A randomized noninferiority trial

AU - Hodgins, Stephen

AU - Thapa, Kusum

AU - Khanal, Leela

AU - Aryal, Shilu

AU - Suvedi, Bal Krishna

AU - Baidya, Urmilla

AU - Mullany, Luke C

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Background: Recent trials of chlorhexidine cord cleansing have employed aqueous solution applied with cotton swabs. Care-takers may prefer gel, resulting in better compliance when implemented at large scale. We examined whether a guar-gum-thickened formulation was at least as efficacious as aqueous in reducing periumbilical flora. Methods: Newborns (n = 694) from normal deliveries at a hospital in Kathmandu were randomly allocated to cord cleansing with either gel or aqueous chlorhexidine, applied by finger. Immediately before and 24 hours after cleansing, periumbilical swabs were collected and cultured. The primary outcome was periumbilical colonization at 24 hours. Household-level acceptability and ease of use in a rural setting where most deliveries are not attended by health workers were assessed by providing 61 women with either gel or aqueous formulations and following up on their experience using the products. Results: Babies allocated to gel and aqueous chlorhexidine were comparable on a range of variables measured at baseline. At 24 hours postapplication, 4.6% (15 of 327) of cultures were positive in the gel group and 10.7% (35 of 326) in the aqueous group. The absolute difference in rates (gel minus aqueous) was -6.1% (95% CI: -10.2%, -2.1%). The acceptability study found that satisfaction and compliance were high for both; use of either largely displaced the traditional use of oil-based mixtures. Overall, there was a preference for gel. Conclusions: The gel formulation was not inferior to aqueous and gel reduced bacterial colonization to a greater degree. A gel formulation might be considered in future research or program settings where chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord is being evaluated or promoted.

AB - Background: Recent trials of chlorhexidine cord cleansing have employed aqueous solution applied with cotton swabs. Care-takers may prefer gel, resulting in better compliance when implemented at large scale. We examined whether a guar-gum-thickened formulation was at least as efficacious as aqueous in reducing periumbilical flora. Methods: Newborns (n = 694) from normal deliveries at a hospital in Kathmandu were randomly allocated to cord cleansing with either gel or aqueous chlorhexidine, applied by finger. Immediately before and 24 hours after cleansing, periumbilical swabs were collected and cultured. The primary outcome was periumbilical colonization at 24 hours. Household-level acceptability and ease of use in a rural setting where most deliveries are not attended by health workers were assessed by providing 61 women with either gel or aqueous formulations and following up on their experience using the products. Results: Babies allocated to gel and aqueous chlorhexidine were comparable on a range of variables measured at baseline. At 24 hours postapplication, 4.6% (15 of 327) of cultures were positive in the gel group and 10.7% (35 of 326) in the aqueous group. The absolute difference in rates (gel minus aqueous) was -6.1% (95% CI: -10.2%, -2.1%). The acceptability study found that satisfaction and compliance were high for both; use of either largely displaced the traditional use of oil-based mixtures. Overall, there was a preference for gel. Conclusions: The gel formulation was not inferior to aqueous and gel reduced bacterial colonization to a greater degree. A gel formulation might be considered in future research or program settings where chlorhexidine cleansing of the cord is being evaluated or promoted.

KW - Equivalence study

KW - neonatal sepsis

KW - Nepal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149282723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149282723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181e70c59

DO - 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181e70c59

M3 - Article

C2 - 20555293

AN - SCOPUS:78149282723

VL - 29

SP - 999

EP - 1003

JO - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

JF - Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

SN - 0891-3668

IS - 11

ER -