Chemical hazards in health care: High hazard, high risk, but low protection

Melissa A. McDiarmid

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

It is counter-intuitive that the healthcare industry, whose mission is the care of the sick, is itself a "high-hazard" industry for the workers it employs. Possessing every hazard class, with chemical agents in the form of pharmaceuticals, sterilants, and germicidals in frequent use, this industry sector consistently demonstrates poor injury and illness statistics, among the highest in the United States, and in the European Union (EU), 34% higher than the average work-related accident rate. In both the United States and the EU, about 10% of all workers are employed in the healthcare sector, and in developing countries as well, forecasts for the increasing need of healthcare workers (HCW) suggests a large population at potential risk of health harm. The explosion of technology growth in the healthcare sector, most obvious in pharmaceutical applications, has not been accompanied by a stepped up safety program in hospitals. Where there is hazard recognition, the remedies are often voluntary, and often poorly enforced. The wrong assumption that this industry would police itself, given its presumed knowledge base, has also been found wanting. The healthcare industry is also a significant waste generator threatening the natural environment with chemical and infectious waste and products of incineration. The ILO has recommended that occupational health goals for industrial nations focus on the hazards of new technology of which pharma and biopharma products are the leaders. This unchecked growth cannot continue without a parallel commitment to the health and safety of workers encountering these "high tech" hazards. Simple strategies to improve the present state include: (a) recognizing healthcare as a "high-hazard" employment sector; (b) fortifying voluntary safety guidelines to the level of enforceable regulation; (c) "potent" inspections; (d) treating hazardous pharmaceuticals like the chemical toxicants they are; and (e) protecting HCWs at least as well as workers in other high-hazard sectors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Pages601-606
Number of pages6
Volume1076
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1076
ISSN (Print)00778923
ISSN (Electronic)17496632

Fingerprint

Chemical hazards
Health Care Sector
Health care
Hazards
Delivery of Health Care
Industry
European Union
Safety
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Incineration
Waste Products
Technology
Health
Knowledge Bases
Explosions
Police
Occupational Health
Growth
Developing Countries
Accidents

Keywords

  • Chemical hazards
  • Healthcare workers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

McDiarmid, M. A. (2006). Chemical hazards in health care: High hazard, high risk, but low protection. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 1076, pp. 601-606). (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Vol. 1076). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1371.032

Chemical hazards in health care : High hazard, high risk, but low protection. / McDiarmid, Melissa A.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 1076 2006. p. 601-606 (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Vol. 1076).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

McDiarmid, MA 2006, Chemical hazards in health care: High hazard, high risk, but low protection. in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. vol. 1076, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1076, pp. 601-606. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1371.032
McDiarmid MA. Chemical hazards in health care: High hazard, high risk, but low protection. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 1076. 2006. p. 601-606. (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences). https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1371.032
McDiarmid, Melissa A. / Chemical hazards in health care : High hazard, high risk, but low protection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. Vol. 1076 2006. pp. 601-606 (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences).
@inproceedings{db0ef165f97c4c0c8389ba45b2dc02f0,
title = "Chemical hazards in health care: High hazard, high risk, but low protection",
abstract = "It is counter-intuitive that the healthcare industry, whose mission is the care of the sick, is itself a {"}high-hazard{"} industry for the workers it employs. Possessing every hazard class, with chemical agents in the form of pharmaceuticals, sterilants, and germicidals in frequent use, this industry sector consistently demonstrates poor injury and illness statistics, among the highest in the United States, and in the European Union (EU), 34{\%} higher than the average work-related accident rate. In both the United States and the EU, about 10{\%} of all workers are employed in the healthcare sector, and in developing countries as well, forecasts for the increasing need of healthcare workers (HCW) suggests a large population at potential risk of health harm. The explosion of technology growth in the healthcare sector, most obvious in pharmaceutical applications, has not been accompanied by a stepped up safety program in hospitals. Where there is hazard recognition, the remedies are often voluntary, and often poorly enforced. The wrong assumption that this industry would police itself, given its presumed knowledge base, has also been found wanting. The healthcare industry is also a significant waste generator threatening the natural environment with chemical and infectious waste and products of incineration. The ILO has recommended that occupational health goals for industrial nations focus on the hazards of new technology of which pharma and biopharma products are the leaders. This unchecked growth cannot continue without a parallel commitment to the health and safety of workers encountering these {"}high tech{"} hazards. Simple strategies to improve the present state include: (a) recognizing healthcare as a {"}high-hazard{"} employment sector; (b) fortifying voluntary safety guidelines to the level of enforceable regulation; (c) {"}potent{"} inspections; (d) treating hazardous pharmaceuticals like the chemical toxicants they are; and (e) protecting HCWs at least as well as workers in other high-hazard sectors.",
keywords = "Chemical hazards, Healthcare workers",
author = "McDiarmid, {Melissa A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1196/annals.1371.032",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1573316539",
volume = "1076",
series = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",
pages = "601--606",
booktitle = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Chemical hazards in health care

T2 - High hazard, high risk, but low protection

AU - McDiarmid, Melissa A.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - It is counter-intuitive that the healthcare industry, whose mission is the care of the sick, is itself a "high-hazard" industry for the workers it employs. Possessing every hazard class, with chemical agents in the form of pharmaceuticals, sterilants, and germicidals in frequent use, this industry sector consistently demonstrates poor injury and illness statistics, among the highest in the United States, and in the European Union (EU), 34% higher than the average work-related accident rate. In both the United States and the EU, about 10% of all workers are employed in the healthcare sector, and in developing countries as well, forecasts for the increasing need of healthcare workers (HCW) suggests a large population at potential risk of health harm. The explosion of technology growth in the healthcare sector, most obvious in pharmaceutical applications, has not been accompanied by a stepped up safety program in hospitals. Where there is hazard recognition, the remedies are often voluntary, and often poorly enforced. The wrong assumption that this industry would police itself, given its presumed knowledge base, has also been found wanting. The healthcare industry is also a significant waste generator threatening the natural environment with chemical and infectious waste and products of incineration. The ILO has recommended that occupational health goals for industrial nations focus on the hazards of new technology of which pharma and biopharma products are the leaders. This unchecked growth cannot continue without a parallel commitment to the health and safety of workers encountering these "high tech" hazards. Simple strategies to improve the present state include: (a) recognizing healthcare as a "high-hazard" employment sector; (b) fortifying voluntary safety guidelines to the level of enforceable regulation; (c) "potent" inspections; (d) treating hazardous pharmaceuticals like the chemical toxicants they are; and (e) protecting HCWs at least as well as workers in other high-hazard sectors.

AB - It is counter-intuitive that the healthcare industry, whose mission is the care of the sick, is itself a "high-hazard" industry for the workers it employs. Possessing every hazard class, with chemical agents in the form of pharmaceuticals, sterilants, and germicidals in frequent use, this industry sector consistently demonstrates poor injury and illness statistics, among the highest in the United States, and in the European Union (EU), 34% higher than the average work-related accident rate. In both the United States and the EU, about 10% of all workers are employed in the healthcare sector, and in developing countries as well, forecasts for the increasing need of healthcare workers (HCW) suggests a large population at potential risk of health harm. The explosion of technology growth in the healthcare sector, most obvious in pharmaceutical applications, has not been accompanied by a stepped up safety program in hospitals. Where there is hazard recognition, the remedies are often voluntary, and often poorly enforced. The wrong assumption that this industry would police itself, given its presumed knowledge base, has also been found wanting. The healthcare industry is also a significant waste generator threatening the natural environment with chemical and infectious waste and products of incineration. The ILO has recommended that occupational health goals for industrial nations focus on the hazards of new technology of which pharma and biopharma products are the leaders. This unchecked growth cannot continue without a parallel commitment to the health and safety of workers encountering these "high tech" hazards. Simple strategies to improve the present state include: (a) recognizing healthcare as a "high-hazard" employment sector; (b) fortifying voluntary safety guidelines to the level of enforceable regulation; (c) "potent" inspections; (d) treating hazardous pharmaceuticals like the chemical toxicants they are; and (e) protecting HCWs at least as well as workers in other high-hazard sectors.

KW - Chemical hazards

KW - Healthcare workers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845659090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845659090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1196/annals.1371.032

DO - 10.1196/annals.1371.032

M3 - Conference contribution

C2 - 17119236

AN - SCOPUS:33845659090

SN - 1573316539

SN - 9781573316538

VL - 1076

T3 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

SP - 601

EP - 606

BT - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

ER -