Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan: Not an open and closed case

Robert C. Hyzy, Scott A. Flanders, Peter J. Pronovost, Sean Berenholtz, Sam Watson, Chris George, Christine A. Goeschel, Judith Maselli, Andrew D. Auerbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Delivery of critical care by intensivists has been recommended by several groups. Our objective was to understand the delivery of critical care physician services in Michigan and the role of intensivists and nonintensivist providers in providing care. DESIGN: Descriptive questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Intensive care unit (ICU) directors and nurse managers at 96 sites, representing 115 ICUs from 72 hospitals in Michigan. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of sites utilizing a closed vs. an open model of ICU care. Secondary outcome measures included the percentage of ICUs utilizing a high-intensity service model, hospital size, ICU size, type of clinician providing care, and clinical activities performed. Twenty-four (25%) sites used a closed model of intensive care, while 72 (75%) had an open model of care. Hospitals with closed ICUs were larger and had larger ICUs than sites with open ICUs (P <0.05). Hospitalists serving as attending physicians were strongly associated with an open ICU (odds ratio [OR] = 12.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5-60.2), as was the absence of intensivists in the group (OR = 12.2; 95%CI = 1.4-105.8), while ICU and hospital size were not associated. At 18 sites (20%) all attendings were board certified in Critical Care. Sixty sites had less than 50% board-certified attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The closed intensivist-led model of intensive care delivery is not in widespread use in Michigan. In the absence of intensivists, alternate models of care, including the hospitalist model, are frequently used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-9
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Hospitalists
Health Facility Size
Physicians
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals
Nurse Administrators

Keywords

  • Care standardization
  • Leadership
  • Multidisciplinary care
  • Teamwork

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Assessment and Diagnosis
  • Care Planning
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Hyzy, R. C., Flanders, S. A., Pronovost, P. J., Berenholtz, S., Watson, S., George, C., ... Auerbach, A. D. (2010). Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan: Not an open and closed case. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 5(1), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.567

Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan : Not an open and closed case. / Hyzy, Robert C.; Flanders, Scott A.; Pronovost, Peter J.; Berenholtz, Sean; Watson, Sam; George, Chris; Goeschel, Christine A.; Maselli, Judith; Auerbach, Andrew D.

In: Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 4-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hyzy, RC, Flanders, SA, Pronovost, PJ, Berenholtz, S, Watson, S, George, C, Goeschel, CA, Maselli, J & Auerbach, AD 2010, 'Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan: Not an open and closed case', Journal of Hospital Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.567
Hyzy, Robert C. ; Flanders, Scott A. ; Pronovost, Peter J. ; Berenholtz, Sean ; Watson, Sam ; George, Chris ; Goeschel, Christine A. ; Maselli, Judith ; Auerbach, Andrew D. / Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan : Not an open and closed case. In: Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 4-9.
@article{862622cab5ee4f08bd474be34b3bd41b,
title = "Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan: Not an open and closed case",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Delivery of critical care by intensivists has been recommended by several groups. Our objective was to understand the delivery of critical care physician services in Michigan and the role of intensivists and nonintensivist providers in providing care. DESIGN: Descriptive questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Intensive care unit (ICU) directors and nurse managers at 96 sites, representing 115 ICUs from 72 hospitals in Michigan. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of sites utilizing a closed vs. an open model of ICU care. Secondary outcome measures included the percentage of ICUs utilizing a high-intensity service model, hospital size, ICU size, type of clinician providing care, and clinical activities performed. Twenty-four (25{\%}) sites used a closed model of intensive care, while 72 (75{\%}) had an open model of care. Hospitals with closed ICUs were larger and had larger ICUs than sites with open ICUs (P <0.05). Hospitalists serving as attending physicians were strongly associated with an open ICU (odds ratio [OR] = 12.2; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 2.5-60.2), as was the absence of intensivists in the group (OR = 12.2; 95{\%}CI = 1.4-105.8), while ICU and hospital size were not associated. At 18 sites (20{\%}) all attendings were board certified in Critical Care. Sixty sites had less than 50{\%} board-certified attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The closed intensivist-led model of intensive care delivery is not in widespread use in Michigan. In the absence of intensivists, alternate models of care, including the hospitalist model, are frequently used.",
keywords = "Care standardization, Leadership, Multidisciplinary care, Teamwork",
author = "Hyzy, {Robert C.} and Flanders, {Scott A.} and Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Sean Berenholtz and Sam Watson and Chris George and Goeschel, {Christine A.} and Judith Maselli and Auerbach, {Andrew D.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jhm.567",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "4--9",
journal = "Journal of hospital medicine (Online)",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics of intensive care units in Michigan

T2 - Not an open and closed case

AU - Hyzy, Robert C.

AU - Flanders, Scott A.

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Berenholtz, Sean

AU - Watson, Sam

AU - George, Chris

AU - Goeschel, Christine A.

AU - Maselli, Judith

AU - Auerbach, Andrew D.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Delivery of critical care by intensivists has been recommended by several groups. Our objective was to understand the delivery of critical care physician services in Michigan and the role of intensivists and nonintensivist providers in providing care. DESIGN: Descriptive questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Intensive care unit (ICU) directors and nurse managers at 96 sites, representing 115 ICUs from 72 hospitals in Michigan. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of sites utilizing a closed vs. an open model of ICU care. Secondary outcome measures included the percentage of ICUs utilizing a high-intensity service model, hospital size, ICU size, type of clinician providing care, and clinical activities performed. Twenty-four (25%) sites used a closed model of intensive care, while 72 (75%) had an open model of care. Hospitals with closed ICUs were larger and had larger ICUs than sites with open ICUs (P <0.05). Hospitalists serving as attending physicians were strongly associated with an open ICU (odds ratio [OR] = 12.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5-60.2), as was the absence of intensivists in the group (OR = 12.2; 95%CI = 1.4-105.8), while ICU and hospital size were not associated. At 18 sites (20%) all attendings were board certified in Critical Care. Sixty sites had less than 50% board-certified attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The closed intensivist-led model of intensive care delivery is not in widespread use in Michigan. In the absence of intensivists, alternate models of care, including the hospitalist model, are frequently used.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Delivery of critical care by intensivists has been recommended by several groups. Our objective was to understand the delivery of critical care physician services in Michigan and the role of intensivists and nonintensivist providers in providing care. DESIGN: Descriptive questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Intensive care unit (ICU) directors and nurse managers at 96 sites, representing 115 ICUs from 72 hospitals in Michigan. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of sites utilizing a closed vs. an open model of ICU care. Secondary outcome measures included the percentage of ICUs utilizing a high-intensity service model, hospital size, ICU size, type of clinician providing care, and clinical activities performed. Twenty-four (25%) sites used a closed model of intensive care, while 72 (75%) had an open model of care. Hospitals with closed ICUs were larger and had larger ICUs than sites with open ICUs (P <0.05). Hospitalists serving as attending physicians were strongly associated with an open ICU (odds ratio [OR] = 12.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5-60.2), as was the absence of intensivists in the group (OR = 12.2; 95%CI = 1.4-105.8), while ICU and hospital size were not associated. At 18 sites (20%) all attendings were board certified in Critical Care. Sixty sites had less than 50% board-certified attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The closed intensivist-led model of intensive care delivery is not in widespread use in Michigan. In the absence of intensivists, alternate models of care, including the hospitalist model, are frequently used.

KW - Care standardization

KW - Leadership

KW - Multidisciplinary care

KW - Teamwork

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74949091881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74949091881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jhm.567

DO - 10.1002/jhm.567

M3 - Article

C2 - 20063391

AN - SCOPUS:74949091881

VL - 5

SP - 4

EP - 9

JO - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

JF - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 1

ER -