Changing indications of open stone surgery

Brian Matlaga, Dean G. Assimos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. To compare the current role of open stone surgery at our institution to previously reported data. In 1989, the indications for open surgical treatment of urinary calculi at our institution were reviewed. In the intervening years, tremendous advances have been made in minimally invasive treatment of urinary calculi. Methods. A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing procedures for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001 was conducted. This was compared with data reported from our institution describing similar procedures in the first 19 months after introduction of the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor. Results. Of 986 procedures performed for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001, 0.7% were open surgical procedures. Of these procedures, 85.8% were performed for anatomic indications. Patients referred from other institutions for evaluation after endoscopic treatment failure comprised the remaining 14.2% of this group. In the previously reported data, 893 procedures were performed for the treatment of urinary calculi, of which 4.1% were open operations. Of these patients, 48.6% underwent an open surgical procedure after unsuccessful endoscopic treatment of urinary calculi, and 48.7% of these patients underwent open surgery for anatomic indications. Conclusions. Open surgical stone removal remains a viable treatment option for select patients. Technologic advances and improved surgical skills have greatly reduced the number of patients requiring open surgery. This approach is mainly used for patients with complex calculous disease associated with anatomic abnormalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-493
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urinary Calculi
Therapeutics
Treatment Failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Changing indications of open stone surgery. / Matlaga, Brian; Assimos, Dean G.

In: Urology, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2002, p. 490-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matlaga, Brian ; Assimos, Dean G. / Changing indications of open stone surgery. In: Urology. 2002 ; Vol. 59, No. 4. pp. 490-493.
@article{122254811b0946048fe499f1cb352576,
title = "Changing indications of open stone surgery",
abstract = "Objectives. To compare the current role of open stone surgery at our institution to previously reported data. In 1989, the indications for open surgical treatment of urinary calculi at our institution were reviewed. In the intervening years, tremendous advances have been made in minimally invasive treatment of urinary calculi. Methods. A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing procedures for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001 was conducted. This was compared with data reported from our institution describing similar procedures in the first 19 months after introduction of the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor. Results. Of 986 procedures performed for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001, 0.7{\%} were open surgical procedures. Of these procedures, 85.8{\%} were performed for anatomic indications. Patients referred from other institutions for evaluation after endoscopic treatment failure comprised the remaining 14.2{\%} of this group. In the previously reported data, 893 procedures were performed for the treatment of urinary calculi, of which 4.1{\%} were open operations. Of these patients, 48.6{\%} underwent an open surgical procedure after unsuccessful endoscopic treatment of urinary calculi, and 48.7{\%} of these patients underwent open surgery for anatomic indications. Conclusions. Open surgical stone removal remains a viable treatment option for select patients. Technologic advances and improved surgical skills have greatly reduced the number of patients requiring open surgery. This approach is mainly used for patients with complex calculous disease associated with anatomic abnormalities.",
author = "Brian Matlaga and Assimos, {Dean G.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01670-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "490--493",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing indications of open stone surgery

AU - Matlaga, Brian

AU - Assimos, Dean G.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objectives. To compare the current role of open stone surgery at our institution to previously reported data. In 1989, the indications for open surgical treatment of urinary calculi at our institution were reviewed. In the intervening years, tremendous advances have been made in minimally invasive treatment of urinary calculi. Methods. A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing procedures for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001 was conducted. This was compared with data reported from our institution describing similar procedures in the first 19 months after introduction of the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor. Results. Of 986 procedures performed for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001, 0.7% were open surgical procedures. Of these procedures, 85.8% were performed for anatomic indications. Patients referred from other institutions for evaluation after endoscopic treatment failure comprised the remaining 14.2% of this group. In the previously reported data, 893 procedures were performed for the treatment of urinary calculi, of which 4.1% were open operations. Of these patients, 48.6% underwent an open surgical procedure after unsuccessful endoscopic treatment of urinary calculi, and 48.7% of these patients underwent open surgery for anatomic indications. Conclusions. Open surgical stone removal remains a viable treatment option for select patients. Technologic advances and improved surgical skills have greatly reduced the number of patients requiring open surgery. This approach is mainly used for patients with complex calculous disease associated with anatomic abnormalities.

AB - Objectives. To compare the current role of open stone surgery at our institution to previously reported data. In 1989, the indications for open surgical treatment of urinary calculi at our institution were reviewed. In the intervening years, tremendous advances have been made in minimally invasive treatment of urinary calculi. Methods. A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing procedures for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001 was conducted. This was compared with data reported from our institution describing similar procedures in the first 19 months after introduction of the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor. Results. Of 986 procedures performed for the purpose of stone removal or fragmentation between January 1, 1998 and May 31, 2001, 0.7% were open surgical procedures. Of these procedures, 85.8% were performed for anatomic indications. Patients referred from other institutions for evaluation after endoscopic treatment failure comprised the remaining 14.2% of this group. In the previously reported data, 893 procedures were performed for the treatment of urinary calculi, of which 4.1% were open operations. Of these patients, 48.6% underwent an open surgical procedure after unsuccessful endoscopic treatment of urinary calculi, and 48.7% of these patients underwent open surgery for anatomic indications. Conclusions. Open surgical stone removal remains a viable treatment option for select patients. Technologic advances and improved surgical skills have greatly reduced the number of patients requiring open surgery. This approach is mainly used for patients with complex calculous disease associated with anatomic abnormalities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036130461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036130461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01670-3

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01670-3

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 490

EP - 493

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 4

ER -