Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China: A difference-in-difference analysis

Xiaolin Wei, Haitao Li, Nan Yang, Samuel Y S Wong, Marc C S Chong, Leiyu Shi, Martin C S Wong, Jianguang Xu, Dan Zhang, Jinling Tang, Donald K T Li, Qingyue Meng, Sian M. Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To assess changes in the quality of primary care in two megacities following the introduction of health system reforms in China. Methods We conducted multistage stratified random face-to-face surveys of patients visiting community health centres in Shanghai in 2011 and 2013, and Shenzhen in 2012 and 2013. Quality of primary care was measured using an assessment tool. Difference-in-difference analyses based on multiple linear regressions were used to compare the changes over time, after controlling for potential confounders. Findings Most (2721) of the 3214 participants used a community health centre as their regular source of care and were included in our analyses. The mean total scores for quality of primary care were similar for Shanghai and Shenzhen at baseline. In Shenzhen, the mean total scores for all participants and those on low incomes had worsened by 0.922 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.215) and 1.203 (95% CI: 0.397 to 2.009), respectively. In Shanghai, however, there were improvements in the mean total scores which included increases in the scores for first-contact utilization, continuity, coordination of information and comprehensiveness. Conclusion The quality of primary care improved in Shanghai but not in Shenzhen. This may be because, in Shanghai, beneficial long-term relationships between patients and general practitioners were supported by capitation payments and the provision of services tailored to the local health priorities

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-416
Number of pages10
JournalBulletin of the World Health Organization
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
China
Primary Health Care
Community Health Centers
Health Priorities
General Practitioners
Linear Models
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China : A difference-in-difference analysis. / Wei, Xiaolin; Li, Haitao; Yang, Nan; Wong, Samuel Y S; Chong, Marc C S; Shi, Leiyu; Wong, Martin C S; Xu, Jianguang; Zhang, Dan; Tang, Jinling; Li, Donald K T; Meng, Qingyue; Griffiths, Sian M.

In: Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 93, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 407-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wei, X, Li, H, Yang, N, Wong, SYS, Chong, MCS, Shi, L, Wong, MCS, Xu, J, Zhang, D, Tang, J, Li, DKT, Meng, Q & Griffiths, SM 2015, 'Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China: A difference-in-difference analysis', Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 407-416. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.139527
Wei, Xiaolin ; Li, Haitao ; Yang, Nan ; Wong, Samuel Y S ; Chong, Marc C S ; Shi, Leiyu ; Wong, Martin C S ; Xu, Jianguang ; Zhang, Dan ; Tang, Jinling ; Li, Donald K T ; Meng, Qingyue ; Griffiths, Sian M. / Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China : A difference-in-difference analysis. In: Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2015 ; Vol. 93, No. 6. pp. 407-416.
@article{b860d560ce324a1e806df916226c90d7,
title = "Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China: A difference-in-difference analysis",
abstract = "Objective To assess changes in the quality of primary care in two megacities following the introduction of health system reforms in China. Methods We conducted multistage stratified random face-to-face surveys of patients visiting community health centres in Shanghai in 2011 and 2013, and Shenzhen in 2012 and 2013. Quality of primary care was measured using an assessment tool. Difference-in-difference analyses based on multiple linear regressions were used to compare the changes over time, after controlling for potential confounders. Findings Most (2721) of the 3214 participants used a community health centre as their regular source of care and were included in our analyses. The mean total scores for quality of primary care were similar for Shanghai and Shenzhen at baseline. In Shenzhen, the mean total scores for all participants and those on low incomes had worsened by 0.922 (95{\%} CI: 0.629 to 1.215) and 1.203 (95{\%} CI: 0.397 to 2.009), respectively. In Shanghai, however, there were improvements in the mean total scores which included increases in the scores for first-contact utilization, continuity, coordination of information and comprehensiveness. Conclusion The quality of primary care improved in Shanghai but not in Shenzhen. This may be because, in Shanghai, beneficial long-term relationships between patients and general practitioners were supported by capitation payments and the provision of services tailored to the local health priorities",
author = "Xiaolin Wei and Haitao Li and Nan Yang and Wong, {Samuel Y S} and Chong, {Marc C S} and Leiyu Shi and Wong, {Martin C S} and Jianguang Xu and Dan Zhang and Jinling Tang and Li, {Donald K T} and Qingyue Meng and Griffiths, {Sian M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2471/BLT.14.139527",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "407--416",
journal = "Bulletin of the World Health Organization",
issn = "0042-9686",
publisher = "World Health Organization",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China

T2 - A difference-in-difference analysis

AU - Wei, Xiaolin

AU - Li, Haitao

AU - Yang, Nan

AU - Wong, Samuel Y S

AU - Chong, Marc C S

AU - Shi, Leiyu

AU - Wong, Martin C S

AU - Xu, Jianguang

AU - Zhang, Dan

AU - Tang, Jinling

AU - Li, Donald K T

AU - Meng, Qingyue

AU - Griffiths, Sian M.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Objective To assess changes in the quality of primary care in two megacities following the introduction of health system reforms in China. Methods We conducted multistage stratified random face-to-face surveys of patients visiting community health centres in Shanghai in 2011 and 2013, and Shenzhen in 2012 and 2013. Quality of primary care was measured using an assessment tool. Difference-in-difference analyses based on multiple linear regressions were used to compare the changes over time, after controlling for potential confounders. Findings Most (2721) of the 3214 participants used a community health centre as their regular source of care and were included in our analyses. The mean total scores for quality of primary care were similar for Shanghai and Shenzhen at baseline. In Shenzhen, the mean total scores for all participants and those on low incomes had worsened by 0.922 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.215) and 1.203 (95% CI: 0.397 to 2.009), respectively. In Shanghai, however, there were improvements in the mean total scores which included increases in the scores for first-contact utilization, continuity, coordination of information and comprehensiveness. Conclusion The quality of primary care improved in Shanghai but not in Shenzhen. This may be because, in Shanghai, beneficial long-term relationships between patients and general practitioners were supported by capitation payments and the provision of services tailored to the local health priorities

AB - Objective To assess changes in the quality of primary care in two megacities following the introduction of health system reforms in China. Methods We conducted multistage stratified random face-to-face surveys of patients visiting community health centres in Shanghai in 2011 and 2013, and Shenzhen in 2012 and 2013. Quality of primary care was measured using an assessment tool. Difference-in-difference analyses based on multiple linear regressions were used to compare the changes over time, after controlling for potential confounders. Findings Most (2721) of the 3214 participants used a community health centre as their regular source of care and were included in our analyses. The mean total scores for quality of primary care were similar for Shanghai and Shenzhen at baseline. In Shenzhen, the mean total scores for all participants and those on low incomes had worsened by 0.922 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.215) and 1.203 (95% CI: 0.397 to 2.009), respectively. In Shanghai, however, there were improvements in the mean total scores which included increases in the scores for first-contact utilization, continuity, coordination of information and comprehensiveness. Conclusion The quality of primary care improved in Shanghai but not in Shenzhen. This may be because, in Shanghai, beneficial long-term relationships between patients and general practitioners were supported by capitation payments and the provision of services tailored to the local health priorities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930372199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930372199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2471/BLT.14.139527

DO - 10.2471/BLT.14.139527

M3 - Article

C2 - 26240462

AN - SCOPUS:84930372199

VL - 93

SP - 407

EP - 416

JO - Bulletin of the World Health Organization

JF - Bulletin of the World Health Organization

SN - 0042-9686

IS - 6

ER -