Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China: A difference-in-difference analysis

Xiaolin Wei, Haitao Li, Nan Yang, Samuel Y.S. Wong, Marc C.S. Chong, Leiyu Shi, Martin C.S. Wong, Jianguang Xu, Dan Zhang, Jinling Tang, Donald K.T. Li, Qingyue Meng, Sian M. Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To assess changes in the quality of primary care in two megacities following the introduction of health system reforms in China. Methods We conducted multistage stratified random face-to-face surveys of patients visiting community health centres in Shanghai in 2011 and 2013, and Shenzhen in 2012 and 2013. Quality of primary care was measured using an assessment tool. Difference-in-difference analyses based on multiple linear regressions were used to compare the changes over time, after controlling for potential confounders. Findings Most (2721) of the 3214 participants used a community health centre as their regular source of care and were included in our analyses. The mean total scores for quality of primary care were similar for Shanghai and Shenzhen at baseline. In Shenzhen, the mean total scores for all participants and those on low incomes had worsened by 0.922 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.215) and 1.203 (95% CI: 0.397 to 2.009), respectively. In Shanghai, however, there were improvements in the mean total scores which included increases in the scores for first-contact utilization, continuity, coordination of information and comprehensiveness. Conclusion The quality of primary care improved in Shanghai but not in Shenzhen.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-416
Number of pages10
JournalBulletin of the World Health Organization
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in the perceived quality of primary care in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China: A difference-in-difference analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this