Changes in patient sorting to nursing homes under public reporting: Improved patient matching or provider gaming?

Rachel M. Werner, R. Tamara Konetzka, Elizabeth Stuart, Daniel E. Polsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To test whether public reporting in the setting of postacute care in nursing homes results in changes in patient sorting. Data Sources/Study Setting. All postacute care admissions from 2001 to 2003 in the nursing home Minimum Data Set. Study Design. We test changes in patient sorting (or the changes in the illness severity of patients going to high- versus low-scoring facilities) when public reporting was initiated in nursing homes in 2002. We test for changes in sorting with respect to pain, delirium, and walking and then examine the potential roles of cream skimming and downcoding in changes in patient sorting. We use a difference-in-differences framework, taking advantage of the variation in the launch of public reporting in pilot and nonpilot states, to control for underlying trends in patient sorting. Principal Findings. There was a significant change in patient sorting with respect to pain after public reporting was initiated, with high-risk patients being more likely to go to high-scoring facilities and low-risk patients more likely to go to low-scoring facilities. There was also an overall decrease in patient risk of pain with the launch of public reporting, which may be consistent with changes in documentation of pain levels (or downcoding). There was no significant change in sorting for delirium or walking. Conclusions. Public reporting of nursing home quality improves matching of high-risk patients to high-quality facilities. However, efforts should be made to reduce the incentives for downcoding by nursing facilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)555-571
Number of pages17
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Nursing Homes
Subacute Care
Pain
Delirium
Walking
Public Facilities
Information Storage and Retrieval
Documentation
Motivation
Nursing

Keywords

  • nursing home quality
  • Public reporting
  • quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Changes in patient sorting to nursing homes under public reporting : Improved patient matching or provider gaming? / Werner, Rachel M.; Konetzka, R. Tamara; Stuart, Elizabeth; Polsky, Daniel E.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 46, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 555-571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f86394d25b774ff69e1be9f6fbad2a4f,
title = "Changes in patient sorting to nursing homes under public reporting: Improved patient matching or provider gaming?",
abstract = "Objective. To test whether public reporting in the setting of postacute care in nursing homes results in changes in patient sorting. Data Sources/Study Setting. All postacute care admissions from 2001 to 2003 in the nursing home Minimum Data Set. Study Design. We test changes in patient sorting (or the changes in the illness severity of patients going to high- versus low-scoring facilities) when public reporting was initiated in nursing homes in 2002. We test for changes in sorting with respect to pain, delirium, and walking and then examine the potential roles of cream skimming and downcoding in changes in patient sorting. We use a difference-in-differences framework, taking advantage of the variation in the launch of public reporting in pilot and nonpilot states, to control for underlying trends in patient sorting. Principal Findings. There was a significant change in patient sorting with respect to pain after public reporting was initiated, with high-risk patients being more likely to go to high-scoring facilities and low-risk patients more likely to go to low-scoring facilities. There was also an overall decrease in patient risk of pain with the launch of public reporting, which may be consistent with changes in documentation of pain levels (or downcoding). There was no significant change in sorting for delirium or walking. Conclusions. Public reporting of nursing home quality improves matching of high-risk patients to high-quality facilities. However, efforts should be made to reduce the incentives for downcoding by nursing facilities.",
keywords = "nursing home quality, Public reporting, quality of care",
author = "Werner, {Rachel M.} and Konetzka, {R. Tamara} and Elizabeth Stuart and Polsky, {Daniel E.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01205.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "555--571",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in patient sorting to nursing homes under public reporting

T2 - Improved patient matching or provider gaming?

AU - Werner, Rachel M.

AU - Konetzka, R. Tamara

AU - Stuart, Elizabeth

AU - Polsky, Daniel E.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Objective. To test whether public reporting in the setting of postacute care in nursing homes results in changes in patient sorting. Data Sources/Study Setting. All postacute care admissions from 2001 to 2003 in the nursing home Minimum Data Set. Study Design. We test changes in patient sorting (or the changes in the illness severity of patients going to high- versus low-scoring facilities) when public reporting was initiated in nursing homes in 2002. We test for changes in sorting with respect to pain, delirium, and walking and then examine the potential roles of cream skimming and downcoding in changes in patient sorting. We use a difference-in-differences framework, taking advantage of the variation in the launch of public reporting in pilot and nonpilot states, to control for underlying trends in patient sorting. Principal Findings. There was a significant change in patient sorting with respect to pain after public reporting was initiated, with high-risk patients being more likely to go to high-scoring facilities and low-risk patients more likely to go to low-scoring facilities. There was also an overall decrease in patient risk of pain with the launch of public reporting, which may be consistent with changes in documentation of pain levels (or downcoding). There was no significant change in sorting for delirium or walking. Conclusions. Public reporting of nursing home quality improves matching of high-risk patients to high-quality facilities. However, efforts should be made to reduce the incentives for downcoding by nursing facilities.

AB - Objective. To test whether public reporting in the setting of postacute care in nursing homes results in changes in patient sorting. Data Sources/Study Setting. All postacute care admissions from 2001 to 2003 in the nursing home Minimum Data Set. Study Design. We test changes in patient sorting (or the changes in the illness severity of patients going to high- versus low-scoring facilities) when public reporting was initiated in nursing homes in 2002. We test for changes in sorting with respect to pain, delirium, and walking and then examine the potential roles of cream skimming and downcoding in changes in patient sorting. We use a difference-in-differences framework, taking advantage of the variation in the launch of public reporting in pilot and nonpilot states, to control for underlying trends in patient sorting. Principal Findings. There was a significant change in patient sorting with respect to pain after public reporting was initiated, with high-risk patients being more likely to go to high-scoring facilities and low-risk patients more likely to go to low-scoring facilities. There was also an overall decrease in patient risk of pain with the launch of public reporting, which may be consistent with changes in documentation of pain levels (or downcoding). There was no significant change in sorting for delirium or walking. Conclusions. Public reporting of nursing home quality improves matching of high-risk patients to high-quality facilities. However, efforts should be made to reduce the incentives for downcoding by nursing facilities.

KW - nursing home quality

KW - Public reporting

KW - quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952383535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952383535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01205.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01205.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21105869

AN - SCOPUS:79952383535

VL - 46

SP - 555

EP - 571

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 2

ER -