Changes in control of saccades during gain adaptation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a typical short-term saccadic adaptation protocol, the target moves intrasaccadically either toward (gain-down) or away (gain-up) from initial fixation, causing the saccade to complete with an endpoint error. A central question is how the motor system adapts in response to this error: are the motor commands changed to bring the eyes to a different goal, akin to a remapping of the target, or is adaptation focused on the processes that monitor the ongoing motor commands and correct them midflight, akin to changes that act via internal feedback? Here, we found that, in the gain-down paradigm, the brain learned to produce a smaller amplitude saccade by altering the trajectory of the saccade. The adapted saccades had reduced peak velocities, reduced accelerations, shallower decelerations, and increased durations compared with a control saccade of equal amplitude. These changes were consistent with a change in an internal feedback that acted as a forward model. However, in the gain-up paradigm, the brain learned to produce a larger amplitude saccade with trajectories that were identical with those of control saccades of equal amplitude. Therefore, whereas the gain-down paradigm appeared to induce adaptation via an internal feedback that controlled saccades midflight, the gain-up paradigm induced adaptation primarily via target remapping. Our simulations explained that, for each condition, the specific adaptation produced a saccade that brought the eyes to the target with the smallest motor costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13929-13937
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume28
Issue number51
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 17 2008

Fingerprint

Saccades
Deceleration
Brain
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Forward models
  • Optimal control
  • Saccade adaptation
  • Saccade kinematics
  • Sensorimotor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Changes in control of saccades during gain adaptation. / Ethier, Vincent; Zee, David Samuel; Shadmehr, Reza.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 28, No. 51, 17.12.2008, p. 13929-13937.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85ebe9baa5ac455c9f0d7706e020bc04,
title = "Changes in control of saccades during gain adaptation",
abstract = "In a typical short-term saccadic adaptation protocol, the target moves intrasaccadically either toward (gain-down) or away (gain-up) from initial fixation, causing the saccade to complete with an endpoint error. A central question is how the motor system adapts in response to this error: are the motor commands changed to bring the eyes to a different goal, akin to a remapping of the target, or is adaptation focused on the processes that monitor the ongoing motor commands and correct them midflight, akin to changes that act via internal feedback? Here, we found that, in the gain-down paradigm, the brain learned to produce a smaller amplitude saccade by altering the trajectory of the saccade. The adapted saccades had reduced peak velocities, reduced accelerations, shallower decelerations, and increased durations compared with a control saccade of equal amplitude. These changes were consistent with a change in an internal feedback that acted as a forward model. However, in the gain-up paradigm, the brain learned to produce a larger amplitude saccade with trajectories that were identical with those of control saccades of equal amplitude. Therefore, whereas the gain-down paradigm appeared to induce adaptation via an internal feedback that controlled saccades midflight, the gain-up paradigm induced adaptation primarily via target remapping. Our simulations explained that, for each condition, the specific adaptation produced a saccade that brought the eyes to the target with the smallest motor costs.",
keywords = "Computational neuroscience, Forward models, Optimal control, Saccade adaptation, Saccade kinematics, Sensorimotor",
author = "Vincent Ethier and Zee, {David Samuel} and Reza Shadmehr",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3470-08.2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "13929--13937",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "51",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in control of saccades during gain adaptation

AU - Ethier, Vincent

AU - Zee, David Samuel

AU - Shadmehr, Reza

PY - 2008/12/17

Y1 - 2008/12/17

N2 - In a typical short-term saccadic adaptation protocol, the target moves intrasaccadically either toward (gain-down) or away (gain-up) from initial fixation, causing the saccade to complete with an endpoint error. A central question is how the motor system adapts in response to this error: are the motor commands changed to bring the eyes to a different goal, akin to a remapping of the target, or is adaptation focused on the processes that monitor the ongoing motor commands and correct them midflight, akin to changes that act via internal feedback? Here, we found that, in the gain-down paradigm, the brain learned to produce a smaller amplitude saccade by altering the trajectory of the saccade. The adapted saccades had reduced peak velocities, reduced accelerations, shallower decelerations, and increased durations compared with a control saccade of equal amplitude. These changes were consistent with a change in an internal feedback that acted as a forward model. However, in the gain-up paradigm, the brain learned to produce a larger amplitude saccade with trajectories that were identical with those of control saccades of equal amplitude. Therefore, whereas the gain-down paradigm appeared to induce adaptation via an internal feedback that controlled saccades midflight, the gain-up paradigm induced adaptation primarily via target remapping. Our simulations explained that, for each condition, the specific adaptation produced a saccade that brought the eyes to the target with the smallest motor costs.

AB - In a typical short-term saccadic adaptation protocol, the target moves intrasaccadically either toward (gain-down) or away (gain-up) from initial fixation, causing the saccade to complete with an endpoint error. A central question is how the motor system adapts in response to this error: are the motor commands changed to bring the eyes to a different goal, akin to a remapping of the target, or is adaptation focused on the processes that monitor the ongoing motor commands and correct them midflight, akin to changes that act via internal feedback? Here, we found that, in the gain-down paradigm, the brain learned to produce a smaller amplitude saccade by altering the trajectory of the saccade. The adapted saccades had reduced peak velocities, reduced accelerations, shallower decelerations, and increased durations compared with a control saccade of equal amplitude. These changes were consistent with a change in an internal feedback that acted as a forward model. However, in the gain-up paradigm, the brain learned to produce a larger amplitude saccade with trajectories that were identical with those of control saccades of equal amplitude. Therefore, whereas the gain-down paradigm appeared to induce adaptation via an internal feedback that controlled saccades midflight, the gain-up paradigm induced adaptation primarily via target remapping. Our simulations explained that, for each condition, the specific adaptation produced a saccade that brought the eyes to the target with the smallest motor costs.

KW - Computational neuroscience

KW - Forward models

KW - Optimal control

KW - Saccade adaptation

KW - Saccade kinematics

KW - Sensorimotor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149385774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149385774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3470-08.2008

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3470-08.2008

M3 - Article

C2 - 19091981

AN - SCOPUS:58149385774

VL - 28

SP - 13929

EP - 13937

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 51

ER -