Challenges in measuring obstetric fistula

C. Stanton, S. A. Holtz, Saifuddin Ahmed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Obstetric fistula is gaining visibility within national and international public health agencies. With increased attention to this dire condition comes the demand for better epidemiologic data. This article assesses the current state of knowledge regarding population-based estimates of the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistulas; proposes a method for better estimating these rates; and discusses the feasibility of this method. We show that there are no solid population-based estimates of the numbers of obstetric fistulas anywhere (the estimate from the most rigorous study being based on only 2 reported fistula cases); and for advocacy purposes, we recommend using the estimates from the 1990 Global Burden of Disease report. To estimate the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistula, we propose an adaptation of the sibling-based method for direct estimation of maternal mortality. A series of questions are proposed for this use and sample size calculations are provided. The questions may require refinement, however, and we invite research groups to consider testing them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume99
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Fistula
Maternal Mortality
Incidence
Sample Size
Population
Siblings
Public Health
Research

Keywords

  • Global estimates
  • Measurement
  • Obstetric fistula
  • Recto-vaginal fistula
  • Vesico-vaginal fistula

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Challenges in measuring obstetric fistula. / Stanton, C.; Holtz, S. A.; Ahmed, Saifuddin.

In: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 99, No. SUPPL. 1, 11.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1962389594f04985b3f9302ead150d5c,
title = "Challenges in measuring obstetric fistula",
abstract = "Obstetric fistula is gaining visibility within national and international public health agencies. With increased attention to this dire condition comes the demand for better epidemiologic data. This article assesses the current state of knowledge regarding population-based estimates of the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistulas; proposes a method for better estimating these rates; and discusses the feasibility of this method. We show that there are no solid population-based estimates of the numbers of obstetric fistulas anywhere (the estimate from the most rigorous study being based on only 2 reported fistula cases); and for advocacy purposes, we recommend using the estimates from the 1990 Global Burden of Disease report. To estimate the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistula, we propose an adaptation of the sibling-based method for direct estimation of maternal mortality. A series of questions are proposed for this use and sample size calculations are provided. The questions may require refinement, however, and we invite research groups to consider testing them.",
keywords = "Global estimates, Measurement, Obstetric fistula, Recto-vaginal fistula, Vesico-vaginal fistula",
author = "C. Stanton and Holtz, {S. A.} and Saifuddin Ahmed",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.06.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "0020-7292",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges in measuring obstetric fistula

AU - Stanton, C.

AU - Holtz, S. A.

AU - Ahmed, Saifuddin

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Obstetric fistula is gaining visibility within national and international public health agencies. With increased attention to this dire condition comes the demand for better epidemiologic data. This article assesses the current state of knowledge regarding population-based estimates of the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistulas; proposes a method for better estimating these rates; and discusses the feasibility of this method. We show that there are no solid population-based estimates of the numbers of obstetric fistulas anywhere (the estimate from the most rigorous study being based on only 2 reported fistula cases); and for advocacy purposes, we recommend using the estimates from the 1990 Global Burden of Disease report. To estimate the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistula, we propose an adaptation of the sibling-based method for direct estimation of maternal mortality. A series of questions are proposed for this use and sample size calculations are provided. The questions may require refinement, however, and we invite research groups to consider testing them.

AB - Obstetric fistula is gaining visibility within national and international public health agencies. With increased attention to this dire condition comes the demand for better epidemiologic data. This article assesses the current state of knowledge regarding population-based estimates of the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistulas; proposes a method for better estimating these rates; and discusses the feasibility of this method. We show that there are no solid population-based estimates of the numbers of obstetric fistulas anywhere (the estimate from the most rigorous study being based on only 2 reported fistula cases); and for advocacy purposes, we recommend using the estimates from the 1990 Global Burden of Disease report. To estimate the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistula, we propose an adaptation of the sibling-based method for direct estimation of maternal mortality. A series of questions are proposed for this use and sample size calculations are provided. The questions may require refinement, however, and we invite research groups to consider testing them.

KW - Global estimates

KW - Measurement

KW - Obstetric fistula

KW - Recto-vaginal fistula

KW - Vesico-vaginal fistula

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548840526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548840526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.06.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.06.010

M3 - Article

VL - 99

JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 0020-7292

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -