Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Palliative Care Research in the U.S. and Similar Practice Settings

Report From a Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network Workshop

Chris Feudtner, Abby R. Rosenberg, Renee Boss, Lori Wiener, Maureen E. Lyon, Pamela S. Hinds, Myra Bluebond-Langner, Joanne Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: To dramatically advance the evidence base for pediatric palliative care (PPC) interventions, practices, and programs in the U.S. and similar practice settings, the field needs to better understand the challenges and opportunities for rigorous scholarship. Objectives: The Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network conducted a workshop to clarify challenges and identify key priorities. Methods: The workshop focused on PPC research topics and methods, including outcomes measurement, qualitative inquiry, analyses of big data, prospective collection of research data, case series and cohort studies, and intervention trials, with synthesizing summary and follow-up discussions. All attendees reviewed and approved the final report. Results: Five common challenges were identified: patient diversity and small population size; interdependencies and dynamic interactions between child, family members, and disease processes over time; outcomes and measurement; workforce and infrastructure limitations; and presumed burden of PPC research on participants. Seven priorities emerged: bolster training and development of PPC investigators; develop core resources; advance symptom measurement (and measurements of other exposures and outcomes); improve symptom management and quality of life interventions; improve communication, elicitation of goals of care, and decision making; understand family impact and facilitate or improve family adaptation and coping; and analyze and improve systems of care, policy, and education. Conclusion: These challenges and priorities identify key research areas that can guide individual investigators and research funders to advance the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Pediatrics
Education
Research
Research Personnel
Patient Care Planning
Population Density
Decision Making
Cohort Studies
Communication
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • decision making
  • family
  • funding
  • infrastructure
  • methodology
  • palliative care
  • Pediatric
  • research
  • symptoms
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Palliative Care Research in the U.S. and Similar Practice Settings : Report From a Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network Workshop. / Feudtner, Chris; Rosenberg, Abby R.; Boss, Renee; Wiener, Lori; Lyon, Maureen E.; Hinds, Pamela S.; Bluebond-Langner, Myra; Wolfe, Joanne.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1b16d97d10e44448283c8028ac2e32b,
title = "Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Palliative Care Research in the U.S. and Similar Practice Settings: Report From a Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network Workshop",
abstract = "Context: To dramatically advance the evidence base for pediatric palliative care (PPC) interventions, practices, and programs in the U.S. and similar practice settings, the field needs to better understand the challenges and opportunities for rigorous scholarship. Objectives: The Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network conducted a workshop to clarify challenges and identify key priorities. Methods: The workshop focused on PPC research topics and methods, including outcomes measurement, qualitative inquiry, analyses of big data, prospective collection of research data, case series and cohort studies, and intervention trials, with synthesizing summary and follow-up discussions. All attendees reviewed and approved the final report. Results: Five common challenges were identified: patient diversity and small population size; interdependencies and dynamic interactions between child, family members, and disease processes over time; outcomes and measurement; workforce and infrastructure limitations; and presumed burden of PPC research on participants. Seven priorities emerged: bolster training and development of PPC investigators; develop core resources; advance symptom measurement (and measurements of other exposures and outcomes); improve symptom management and quality of life interventions; improve communication, elicitation of goals of care, and decision making; understand family impact and facilitate or improve family adaptation and coping; and analyze and improve systems of care, policy, and education. Conclusion: These challenges and priorities identify key research areas that can guide individual investigators and research funders to advance the field.",
keywords = "decision making, family, funding, infrastructure, methodology, palliative care, Pediatric, research, symptoms, training",
author = "Chris Feudtner and Rosenberg, {Abby R.} and Renee Boss and Lori Wiener and Lyon, {Maureen E.} and Hinds, {Pamela S.} and Myra Bluebond-Langner and Joanne Wolfe",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges and Priorities for Pediatric Palliative Care Research in the U.S. and Similar Practice Settings

T2 - Report From a Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network Workshop

AU - Feudtner, Chris

AU - Rosenberg, Abby R.

AU - Boss, Renee

AU - Wiener, Lori

AU - Lyon, Maureen E.

AU - Hinds, Pamela S.

AU - Bluebond-Langner, Myra

AU - Wolfe, Joanne

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Context: To dramatically advance the evidence base for pediatric palliative care (PPC) interventions, practices, and programs in the U.S. and similar practice settings, the field needs to better understand the challenges and opportunities for rigorous scholarship. Objectives: The Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network conducted a workshop to clarify challenges and identify key priorities. Methods: The workshop focused on PPC research topics and methods, including outcomes measurement, qualitative inquiry, analyses of big data, prospective collection of research data, case series and cohort studies, and intervention trials, with synthesizing summary and follow-up discussions. All attendees reviewed and approved the final report. Results: Five common challenges were identified: patient diversity and small population size; interdependencies and dynamic interactions between child, family members, and disease processes over time; outcomes and measurement; workforce and infrastructure limitations; and presumed burden of PPC research on participants. Seven priorities emerged: bolster training and development of PPC investigators; develop core resources; advance symptom measurement (and measurements of other exposures and outcomes); improve symptom management and quality of life interventions; improve communication, elicitation of goals of care, and decision making; understand family impact and facilitate or improve family adaptation and coping; and analyze and improve systems of care, policy, and education. Conclusion: These challenges and priorities identify key research areas that can guide individual investigators and research funders to advance the field.

AB - Context: To dramatically advance the evidence base for pediatric palliative care (PPC) interventions, practices, and programs in the U.S. and similar practice settings, the field needs to better understand the challenges and opportunities for rigorous scholarship. Objectives: The Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network conducted a workshop to clarify challenges and identify key priorities. Methods: The workshop focused on PPC research topics and methods, including outcomes measurement, qualitative inquiry, analyses of big data, prospective collection of research data, case series and cohort studies, and intervention trials, with synthesizing summary and follow-up discussions. All attendees reviewed and approved the final report. Results: Five common challenges were identified: patient diversity and small population size; interdependencies and dynamic interactions between child, family members, and disease processes over time; outcomes and measurement; workforce and infrastructure limitations; and presumed burden of PPC research on participants. Seven priorities emerged: bolster training and development of PPC investigators; develop core resources; advance symptom measurement (and measurements of other exposures and outcomes); improve symptom management and quality of life interventions; improve communication, elicitation of goals of care, and decision making; understand family impact and facilitate or improve family adaptation and coping; and analyze and improve systems of care, policy, and education. Conclusion: These challenges and priorities identify key research areas that can guide individual investigators and research funders to advance the field.

KW - decision making

KW - family

KW - funding

KW - infrastructure

KW - methodology

KW - palliative care

KW - Pediatric

KW - research

KW - symptoms

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072193777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072193777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.011

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

ER -