Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans

Minnan Xu-Wilson, Haiyin Chen-Harris, David Samuel Zee, Reza Shadmehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The cerebellum may monitor motor commands and through internal feedback correct for anticipated errors. Saccades provide a test of this idea because these movements are completed too quickly for sensory feedback to be useful. Earlier, we reported that motor commands that accelerate the eyes toward a constant amplitude target showed variability. Here, we demonstrate that this variability is not randomnoise, but is due to the cognitive state of the subject. Healthy people showed within-saccade compensation for this variability with commands that arrived later in the same saccade. However, in people with cerebellar damage, the same variability resulted in dysmetria. This ability to correct for variability in the motor commands that initiated a saccade was a predictor of each subject's ability to learn from endpoint errors. In a paradigm in which a target on the horizontal meridian jumped vertically during the saccade (resulting in an endpoint error), the adaptive response exhibited two timescales: a fast timescale that learned quickly from endpoint error but had poor retention, and a slow timescale that learned slowly but had strong retention. With cortical cerebellar damage, the fast timescale of adaptation was effectively absent, but the slow timescale was less impaired. Therefore, the cerebellum corrects for variability in the motor commands that initiate saccades within the same movement via an adaptive response that not only exhibits strong sensitivity to previous endpoint errors, but also rapid forgetting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12930-12939
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume29
Issue number41
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 14 2009

Fingerprint

Saccades
Aptitude
Cerebellum
Meridians
Cerebellar Ataxia
Sensory Feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans. / Xu-Wilson, Minnan; Chen-Harris, Haiyin; Zee, David Samuel; Shadmehr, Reza.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 29, No. 41, 14.10.2009, p. 12930-12939.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xu-Wilson, Minnan ; Chen-Harris, Haiyin ; Zee, David Samuel ; Shadmehr, Reza. / Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 41. pp. 12930-12939.
@article{1b45d08824e1486083becc67ee878168,
title = "Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans",
abstract = "The cerebellum may monitor motor commands and through internal feedback correct for anticipated errors. Saccades provide a test of this idea because these movements are completed too quickly for sensory feedback to be useful. Earlier, we reported that motor commands that accelerate the eyes toward a constant amplitude target showed variability. Here, we demonstrate that this variability is not randomnoise, but is due to the cognitive state of the subject. Healthy people showed within-saccade compensation for this variability with commands that arrived later in the same saccade. However, in people with cerebellar damage, the same variability resulted in dysmetria. This ability to correct for variability in the motor commands that initiated a saccade was a predictor of each subject's ability to learn from endpoint errors. In a paradigm in which a target on the horizontal meridian jumped vertically during the saccade (resulting in an endpoint error), the adaptive response exhibited two timescales: a fast timescale that learned quickly from endpoint error but had poor retention, and a slow timescale that learned slowly but had strong retention. With cortical cerebellar damage, the fast timescale of adaptation was effectively absent, but the slow timescale was less impaired. Therefore, the cerebellum corrects for variability in the motor commands that initiate saccades within the same movement via an adaptive response that not only exhibits strong sensitivity to previous endpoint errors, but also rapid forgetting.",
author = "Minnan Xu-Wilson and Haiyin Chen-Harris and Zee, {David Samuel} and Reza Shadmehr",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3115-09.2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "12930--12939",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "41",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans

AU - Xu-Wilson, Minnan

AU - Chen-Harris, Haiyin

AU - Zee, David Samuel

AU - Shadmehr, Reza

PY - 2009/10/14

Y1 - 2009/10/14

N2 - The cerebellum may monitor motor commands and through internal feedback correct for anticipated errors. Saccades provide a test of this idea because these movements are completed too quickly for sensory feedback to be useful. Earlier, we reported that motor commands that accelerate the eyes toward a constant amplitude target showed variability. Here, we demonstrate that this variability is not randomnoise, but is due to the cognitive state of the subject. Healthy people showed within-saccade compensation for this variability with commands that arrived later in the same saccade. However, in people with cerebellar damage, the same variability resulted in dysmetria. This ability to correct for variability in the motor commands that initiated a saccade was a predictor of each subject's ability to learn from endpoint errors. In a paradigm in which a target on the horizontal meridian jumped vertically during the saccade (resulting in an endpoint error), the adaptive response exhibited two timescales: a fast timescale that learned quickly from endpoint error but had poor retention, and a slow timescale that learned slowly but had strong retention. With cortical cerebellar damage, the fast timescale of adaptation was effectively absent, but the slow timescale was less impaired. Therefore, the cerebellum corrects for variability in the motor commands that initiate saccades within the same movement via an adaptive response that not only exhibits strong sensitivity to previous endpoint errors, but also rapid forgetting.

AB - The cerebellum may monitor motor commands and through internal feedback correct for anticipated errors. Saccades provide a test of this idea because these movements are completed too quickly for sensory feedback to be useful. Earlier, we reported that motor commands that accelerate the eyes toward a constant amplitude target showed variability. Here, we demonstrate that this variability is not randomnoise, but is due to the cognitive state of the subject. Healthy people showed within-saccade compensation for this variability with commands that arrived later in the same saccade. However, in people with cerebellar damage, the same variability resulted in dysmetria. This ability to correct for variability in the motor commands that initiated a saccade was a predictor of each subject's ability to learn from endpoint errors. In a paradigm in which a target on the horizontal meridian jumped vertically during the saccade (resulting in an endpoint error), the adaptive response exhibited two timescales: a fast timescale that learned quickly from endpoint error but had poor retention, and a slow timescale that learned slowly but had strong retention. With cortical cerebellar damage, the fast timescale of adaptation was effectively absent, but the slow timescale was less impaired. Therefore, the cerebellum corrects for variability in the motor commands that initiate saccades within the same movement via an adaptive response that not only exhibits strong sensitivity to previous endpoint errors, but also rapid forgetting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350450530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350450530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3115-09.2009

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3115-09.2009

M3 - Article

C2 - 19828807

AN - SCOPUS:70350450530

VL - 29

SP - 12930

EP - 12939

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 41

ER -