CD44 and CD69 represent different types of cell-surface activation markers for human eosinophils

Kenji Matsumoto, James Appiah-Pippim, Robert P. Schleimer, Carol A. Bickel, Lisa A. Beck, Bruce S. Bochner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Eosinophils (EOS) purified from peripheral blood or late-phase bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were analyzed with 473 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from the Fifth International Workshop on Human Leukocyte Antigens in an attempt to identify markers of EOS activation. Two strategies were used: (1) to look for surface markers absent on fresh EOS but present after in vivo activation (e.g., in late-phase BAL fluid [BALF]) or after in vitro culture for up to 72 h with cytokines (≤ 10 ng/ml of interleukin-3 [IL-3], IL-5, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]); and (2) to look for markers constitutively expressed on fresh EOS that were increased after activation in vivo or after culture in vitro. With indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, the first approach revealed that among approximately 350 mAbs tested, only those recognizing CD69 became bound to late-phase BALF EOS or cytokine-cultured EOS, but not to fresh EOS. Using the second approach, we observed statistically significant concentration-and time-dependent increases in CD44 expression in EOS cultured with IL-3, IL-5, or GM-CSF (∼ 2-fold increase in fluorescence intensity, P <0.05), but not with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (up to 100 ng/ml), whereas levels of 15 other constitutively expressed markers were unchanged. Despite increased expression, neither fresh nor cytokine-cultured EOS adhered to immobilized hyaluronate, a ligand for CD44. Additionally, simultaneous comparison of hypodense (specific gravity <1.085 g/liter) and normodense (specific gravity > 1.085 g/liter) EOS from allergic donors consistently revealed higher levels of CD44 expression (∼ 3-to 8-fold) but not CD69 expression on hypodense EOS. We conclude that CD69 and CD44 represent different types of activation markers for human EOS. These findings may be useful in assessing the state of EOS activation in vitro and in vivo.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)860-866
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
Volume18
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Eosinophils
Chemical activation
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
Interleukin-3
Interleukin-5
Monoclonal Antibodies
Cytokines
Dimercaprol
Fluids
Flow cytometry
HLA Antigens
Blood
Fluorescence
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
Bronchoalveolar Lavage
Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Flow Cytometry
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Matsumoto, K., Appiah-Pippim, J., Schleimer, R. P., Bickel, C. A., Beck, L. A., & Bochner, B. S. (1998). CD44 and CD69 represent different types of cell-surface activation markers for human eosinophils. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, 18(6), 860-866.

CD44 and CD69 represent different types of cell-surface activation markers for human eosinophils. / Matsumoto, Kenji; Appiah-Pippim, James; Schleimer, Robert P.; Bickel, Carol A.; Beck, Lisa A.; Bochner, Bruce S.

In: American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1998, p. 860-866.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matsumoto, K, Appiah-Pippim, J, Schleimer, RP, Bickel, CA, Beck, LA & Bochner, BS 1998, 'CD44 and CD69 represent different types of cell-surface activation markers for human eosinophils', American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 860-866.
Matsumoto, Kenji ; Appiah-Pippim, James ; Schleimer, Robert P. ; Bickel, Carol A. ; Beck, Lisa A. ; Bochner, Bruce S. / CD44 and CD69 represent different types of cell-surface activation markers for human eosinophils. In: American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 1998 ; Vol. 18, No. 6. pp. 860-866.
@article{80f55611a8d848e49093e5933d06eb94,
title = "CD44 and CD69 represent different types of cell-surface activation markers for human eosinophils",
abstract = "Eosinophils (EOS) purified from peripheral blood or late-phase bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were analyzed with 473 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from the Fifth International Workshop on Human Leukocyte Antigens in an attempt to identify markers of EOS activation. Two strategies were used: (1) to look for surface markers absent on fresh EOS but present after in vivo activation (e.g., in late-phase BAL fluid [BALF]) or after in vitro culture for up to 72 h with cytokines (≤ 10 ng/ml of interleukin-3 [IL-3], IL-5, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]); and (2) to look for markers constitutively expressed on fresh EOS that were increased after activation in vivo or after culture in vitro. With indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, the first approach revealed that among approximately 350 mAbs tested, only those recognizing CD69 became bound to late-phase BALF EOS or cytokine-cultured EOS, but not to fresh EOS. Using the second approach, we observed statistically significant concentration-and time-dependent increases in CD44 expression in EOS cultured with IL-3, IL-5, or GM-CSF (∼ 2-fold increase in fluorescence intensity, P <0.05), but not with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (up to 100 ng/ml), whereas levels of 15 other constitutively expressed markers were unchanged. Despite increased expression, neither fresh nor cytokine-cultured EOS adhered to immobilized hyaluronate, a ligand for CD44. Additionally, simultaneous comparison of hypodense (specific gravity <1.085 g/liter) and normodense (specific gravity > 1.085 g/liter) EOS from allergic donors consistently revealed higher levels of CD44 expression (∼ 3-to 8-fold) but not CD69 expression on hypodense EOS. We conclude that CD69 and CD44 represent different types of activation markers for human EOS. These findings may be useful in assessing the state of EOS activation in vitro and in vivo.",
author = "Kenji Matsumoto and James Appiah-Pippim and Schleimer, {Robert P.} and Bickel, {Carol A.} and Beck, {Lisa A.} and Bochner, {Bruce S.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "860--866",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology",
issn = "1044-1549",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CD44 and CD69 represent different types of cell-surface activation markers for human eosinophils

AU - Matsumoto, Kenji

AU - Appiah-Pippim, James

AU - Schleimer, Robert P.

AU - Bickel, Carol A.

AU - Beck, Lisa A.

AU - Bochner, Bruce S.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Eosinophils (EOS) purified from peripheral blood or late-phase bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were analyzed with 473 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from the Fifth International Workshop on Human Leukocyte Antigens in an attempt to identify markers of EOS activation. Two strategies were used: (1) to look for surface markers absent on fresh EOS but present after in vivo activation (e.g., in late-phase BAL fluid [BALF]) or after in vitro culture for up to 72 h with cytokines (≤ 10 ng/ml of interleukin-3 [IL-3], IL-5, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]); and (2) to look for markers constitutively expressed on fresh EOS that were increased after activation in vivo or after culture in vitro. With indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, the first approach revealed that among approximately 350 mAbs tested, only those recognizing CD69 became bound to late-phase BALF EOS or cytokine-cultured EOS, but not to fresh EOS. Using the second approach, we observed statistically significant concentration-and time-dependent increases in CD44 expression in EOS cultured with IL-3, IL-5, or GM-CSF (∼ 2-fold increase in fluorescence intensity, P <0.05), but not with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (up to 100 ng/ml), whereas levels of 15 other constitutively expressed markers were unchanged. Despite increased expression, neither fresh nor cytokine-cultured EOS adhered to immobilized hyaluronate, a ligand for CD44. Additionally, simultaneous comparison of hypodense (specific gravity <1.085 g/liter) and normodense (specific gravity > 1.085 g/liter) EOS from allergic donors consistently revealed higher levels of CD44 expression (∼ 3-to 8-fold) but not CD69 expression on hypodense EOS. We conclude that CD69 and CD44 represent different types of activation markers for human EOS. These findings may be useful in assessing the state of EOS activation in vitro and in vivo.

AB - Eosinophils (EOS) purified from peripheral blood or late-phase bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were analyzed with 473 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from the Fifth International Workshop on Human Leukocyte Antigens in an attempt to identify markers of EOS activation. Two strategies were used: (1) to look for surface markers absent on fresh EOS but present after in vivo activation (e.g., in late-phase BAL fluid [BALF]) or after in vitro culture for up to 72 h with cytokines (≤ 10 ng/ml of interleukin-3 [IL-3], IL-5, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]); and (2) to look for markers constitutively expressed on fresh EOS that were increased after activation in vivo or after culture in vitro. With indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, the first approach revealed that among approximately 350 mAbs tested, only those recognizing CD69 became bound to late-phase BALF EOS or cytokine-cultured EOS, but not to fresh EOS. Using the second approach, we observed statistically significant concentration-and time-dependent increases in CD44 expression in EOS cultured with IL-3, IL-5, or GM-CSF (∼ 2-fold increase in fluorescence intensity, P <0.05), but not with interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (up to 100 ng/ml), whereas levels of 15 other constitutively expressed markers were unchanged. Despite increased expression, neither fresh nor cytokine-cultured EOS adhered to immobilized hyaluronate, a ligand for CD44. Additionally, simultaneous comparison of hypodense (specific gravity <1.085 g/liter) and normodense (specific gravity > 1.085 g/liter) EOS from allergic donors consistently revealed higher levels of CD44 expression (∼ 3-to 8-fold) but not CD69 expression on hypodense EOS. We conclude that CD69 and CD44 represent different types of activation markers for human EOS. These findings may be useful in assessing the state of EOS activation in vitro and in vivo.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032090255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032090255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9618391

AN - SCOPUS:0032090255

VL - 18

SP - 860

EP - 866

JO - American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology

JF - American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology

SN - 1044-1549

IS - 6

ER -