Case reports: Publication standards in forensic psychiatry

Annette Hanson, Richard Martinez, Philip J. Candilis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Psychiatrists who publish case reports are required to seek informed consent from their subjects on the basis of the ethics-related obligation to maintain patient confidentiality. Academic journals have developed editorial standards to fulfill this obligation. Forensic evaluations do not create a doctor-patient relationship in the traditional sense, and information obtained through a forensic evaluation may also be found in the public domain. This public exposure is particularly likely, given the development of open access publishing standards, online journals, and increasing professional involvement in social media. This article outlines the ethics of informed consent in published case reports for general and forensic psychiatry and offers recommendations for forensic case study publishing. The authors suggest changes in the current requirements stated in The Journal for publication of case reports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-304
Number of pages8
JournalThe journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume42
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Forensic Psychiatry
Informed Consent
Ethics
Publications
Social Media
Public Sector
Confidentiality
Psychiatry
Open Access Publishing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Case reports : Publication standards in forensic psychiatry. / Hanson, Annette; Martinez, Richard; Candilis, Philip J.

In: The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2014, p. 297-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f7242ad60e2b40b4beaed2d7580cf1b1,
title = "Case reports: Publication standards in forensic psychiatry",
abstract = "Psychiatrists who publish case reports are required to seek informed consent from their subjects on the basis of the ethics-related obligation to maintain patient confidentiality. Academic journals have developed editorial standards to fulfill this obligation. Forensic evaluations do not create a doctor-patient relationship in the traditional sense, and information obtained through a forensic evaluation may also be found in the public domain. This public exposure is particularly likely, given the development of open access publishing standards, online journals, and increasing professional involvement in social media. This article outlines the ethics of informed consent in published case reports for general and forensic psychiatry and offers recommendations for forensic case study publishing. The authors suggest changes in the current requirements stated in The Journal for publication of case reports.",
author = "Annette Hanson and Richard Martinez and Candilis, {Philip J.}",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "297--304",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case reports

T2 - Publication standards in forensic psychiatry

AU - Hanson, Annette

AU - Martinez, Richard

AU - Candilis, Philip J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Psychiatrists who publish case reports are required to seek informed consent from their subjects on the basis of the ethics-related obligation to maintain patient confidentiality. Academic journals have developed editorial standards to fulfill this obligation. Forensic evaluations do not create a doctor-patient relationship in the traditional sense, and information obtained through a forensic evaluation may also be found in the public domain. This public exposure is particularly likely, given the development of open access publishing standards, online journals, and increasing professional involvement in social media. This article outlines the ethics of informed consent in published case reports for general and forensic psychiatry and offers recommendations for forensic case study publishing. The authors suggest changes in the current requirements stated in The Journal for publication of case reports.

AB - Psychiatrists who publish case reports are required to seek informed consent from their subjects on the basis of the ethics-related obligation to maintain patient confidentiality. Academic journals have developed editorial standards to fulfill this obligation. Forensic evaluations do not create a doctor-patient relationship in the traditional sense, and information obtained through a forensic evaluation may also be found in the public domain. This public exposure is particularly likely, given the development of open access publishing standards, online journals, and increasing professional involvement in social media. This article outlines the ethics of informed consent in published case reports for general and forensic psychiatry and offers recommendations for forensic case study publishing. The authors suggest changes in the current requirements stated in The Journal for publication of case reports.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919922343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919922343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25187282

AN - SCOPUS:84919922343

VL - 42

SP - 297

EP - 304

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 3

ER -