Carrying Guns in Public: Legal and Public Health Implications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own handguns in the home for protection, invalidating a Washington, D.C. law banning most handgun possession. The Heller decision, however, provided lower courts with little guidance regarding how to judge the constitutionality of gun laws other than handgun bans. Nevertheless, lower courts have upheld the vast majority of federal, state, and local gun laws challenged since Heller. One area in which some lower courts have disagreed has been the constitutionality of laws regulating the ability to carry firearms in public. This issue may be the next to be addressed by the Supreme Court under its evolving Second Amendment jurisprudence. Courts should carefully consider the negative public health and safety implications of gun carrying in public as they weigh the constitutionality of these laws.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-87
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume41
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Firearms
Public Health
Jurisprudence
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Carrying Guns in Public : Legal and Public Health Implications. / Vernick, Jon S.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 41, No. SUPPL. 1, 03.2013, p. 84-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c14d5b4d31e4560b5fcf376f42ac3db,
title = "Carrying Guns in Public: Legal and Public Health Implications",
abstract = "In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own handguns in the home for protection, invalidating a Washington, D.C. law banning most handgun possession. The Heller decision, however, provided lower courts with little guidance regarding how to judge the constitutionality of gun laws other than handgun bans. Nevertheless, lower courts have upheld the vast majority of federal, state, and local gun laws challenged since Heller. One area in which some lower courts have disagreed has been the constitutionality of laws regulating the ability to carry firearms in public. This issue may be the next to be addressed by the Supreme Court under its evolving Second Amendment jurisprudence. Courts should carefully consider the negative public health and safety implications of gun carrying in public as they weigh the constitutionality of these laws.",
author = "Vernick, {Jon S}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/jlme.12047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "84--87",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carrying Guns in Public

T2 - Legal and Public Health Implications

AU - Vernick, Jon S

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own handguns in the home for protection, invalidating a Washington, D.C. law banning most handgun possession. The Heller decision, however, provided lower courts with little guidance regarding how to judge the constitutionality of gun laws other than handgun bans. Nevertheless, lower courts have upheld the vast majority of federal, state, and local gun laws challenged since Heller. One area in which some lower courts have disagreed has been the constitutionality of laws regulating the ability to carry firearms in public. This issue may be the next to be addressed by the Supreme Court under its evolving Second Amendment jurisprudence. Courts should carefully consider the negative public health and safety implications of gun carrying in public as they weigh the constitutionality of these laws.

AB - In District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own handguns in the home for protection, invalidating a Washington, D.C. law banning most handgun possession. The Heller decision, however, provided lower courts with little guidance regarding how to judge the constitutionality of gun laws other than handgun bans. Nevertheless, lower courts have upheld the vast majority of federal, state, and local gun laws challenged since Heller. One area in which some lower courts have disagreed has been the constitutionality of laws regulating the ability to carry firearms in public. This issue may be the next to be addressed by the Supreme Court under its evolving Second Amendment jurisprudence. Courts should carefully consider the negative public health and safety implications of gun carrying in public as they weigh the constitutionality of these laws.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876969087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876969087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jlme.12047

DO - 10.1111/jlme.12047

M3 - Article

C2 - 23590749

AN - SCOPUS:84876969087

VL - 41

SP - 84

EP - 87

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -