Carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion without intraoperative shunting

Ali Bydon, Ajith J. Thomas, Donald Seyfried, Ghaus Malik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy about the optimal method of performing a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) exists despite its widespread application and support from various randomized clinical trials. Many surgeons selectively or routinely use electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring as well as shunting when performing this operation. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to assess the maximum carotid clamp time without shunting or EEG monitoring during a CEA without the development of neurological deficits in an already compromised cerebral circulation. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent CEAs between 1988 and 1999 met our criteria of angiographically documented ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion. The patient presentations included asymptomatic (14%), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (50%), and stroke (36%). All patients were operated under general anesthesia without shunting and only 4 patients underwent EEG monitoring. On angiography, all 15 patients had ipsilateral ICA stenosis (70-99%) and contralateral occlusion. In 54% of patients, the vertebral arteries (VAs) were both patent, while in 46% of patients only 1 VA was patent. Eighty-five percent of patients had at least 1 patent anterior communicating (Pcomm) artery, while 15% had nonvisualized Pcomm arteries bilaterally. Of the 15 patients, 14 had a patent anterior communicating artery. The mean clamp time of the CCA was 18.5 minutes (range 14-30 minutes). None of the 15 patients had new neurological changes immediately postoperatively or during the 6 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSION: We propose that shunting may not be necessary during CEA for high-grade stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion, presumably because of adequate distal small vessel collaterals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-330
Number of pages6
JournalSurgical Neurology
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Internal Carotid Artery
Electroencephalography
Vertebral Artery
Arteries
Carotid Stenosis
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Transient Ischemic Attack
General Anesthesia
Angiography
Pathologic Constriction
Randomized Controlled Trials
Retrospective Studies
Stroke

Keywords

  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Internal carotid artery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion without intraoperative shunting. / Bydon, Ali; Thomas, Ajith J.; Seyfried, Donald; Malik, Ghaus.

In: Surgical Neurology, Vol. 57, No. 5, 2002, p. 325-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bydon, Ali ; Thomas, Ajith J. ; Seyfried, Donald ; Malik, Ghaus. / Carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion without intraoperative shunting. In: Surgical Neurology. 2002 ; Vol. 57, No. 5. pp. 325-330.
@article{8f1dc29423ef489d939759947f2aff0a,
title = "Carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion without intraoperative shunting",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Controversy about the optimal method of performing a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) exists despite its widespread application and support from various randomized clinical trials. Many surgeons selectively or routinely use electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring as well as shunting when performing this operation. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to assess the maximum carotid clamp time without shunting or EEG monitoring during a CEA without the development of neurological deficits in an already compromised cerebral circulation. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent CEAs between 1988 and 1999 met our criteria of angiographically documented ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion. The patient presentations included asymptomatic (14{\%}), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (50{\%}), and stroke (36{\%}). All patients were operated under general anesthesia without shunting and only 4 patients underwent EEG monitoring. On angiography, all 15 patients had ipsilateral ICA stenosis (70-99{\%}) and contralateral occlusion. In 54{\%} of patients, the vertebral arteries (VAs) were both patent, while in 46{\%} of patients only 1 VA was patent. Eighty-five percent of patients had at least 1 patent anterior communicating (Pcomm) artery, while 15{\%} had nonvisualized Pcomm arteries bilaterally. Of the 15 patients, 14 had a patent anterior communicating artery. The mean clamp time of the CCA was 18.5 minutes (range 14-30 minutes). None of the 15 patients had new neurological changes immediately postoperatively or during the 6 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSION: We propose that shunting may not be necessary during CEA for high-grade stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion, presumably because of adequate distal small vessel collaterals.",
keywords = "Carotid endarterectomy, Internal carotid artery",
author = "Ali Bydon and Thomas, {Ajith J.} and Donald Seyfried and Ghaus Malik",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00678-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "325--330",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion without intraoperative shunting

AU - Bydon, Ali

AU - Thomas, Ajith J.

AU - Seyfried, Donald

AU - Malik, Ghaus

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - BACKGROUND: Controversy about the optimal method of performing a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) exists despite its widespread application and support from various randomized clinical trials. Many surgeons selectively or routinely use electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring as well as shunting when performing this operation. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to assess the maximum carotid clamp time without shunting or EEG monitoring during a CEA without the development of neurological deficits in an already compromised cerebral circulation. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent CEAs between 1988 and 1999 met our criteria of angiographically documented ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion. The patient presentations included asymptomatic (14%), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (50%), and stroke (36%). All patients were operated under general anesthesia without shunting and only 4 patients underwent EEG monitoring. On angiography, all 15 patients had ipsilateral ICA stenosis (70-99%) and contralateral occlusion. In 54% of patients, the vertebral arteries (VAs) were both patent, while in 46% of patients only 1 VA was patent. Eighty-five percent of patients had at least 1 patent anterior communicating (Pcomm) artery, while 15% had nonvisualized Pcomm arteries bilaterally. Of the 15 patients, 14 had a patent anterior communicating artery. The mean clamp time of the CCA was 18.5 minutes (range 14-30 minutes). None of the 15 patients had new neurological changes immediately postoperatively or during the 6 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSION: We propose that shunting may not be necessary during CEA for high-grade stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion, presumably because of adequate distal small vessel collaterals.

AB - BACKGROUND: Controversy about the optimal method of performing a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) exists despite its widespread application and support from various randomized clinical trials. Many surgeons selectively or routinely use electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring as well as shunting when performing this operation. METHODS: We conducted this retrospective study to assess the maximum carotid clamp time without shunting or EEG monitoring during a CEA without the development of neurological deficits in an already compromised cerebral circulation. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent CEAs between 1988 and 1999 met our criteria of angiographically documented ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion. The patient presentations included asymptomatic (14%), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (50%), and stroke (36%). All patients were operated under general anesthesia without shunting and only 4 patients underwent EEG monitoring. On angiography, all 15 patients had ipsilateral ICA stenosis (70-99%) and contralateral occlusion. In 54% of patients, the vertebral arteries (VAs) were both patent, while in 46% of patients only 1 VA was patent. Eighty-five percent of patients had at least 1 patent anterior communicating (Pcomm) artery, while 15% had nonvisualized Pcomm arteries bilaterally. Of the 15 patients, 14 had a patent anterior communicating artery. The mean clamp time of the CCA was 18.5 minutes (range 14-30 minutes). None of the 15 patients had new neurological changes immediately postoperatively or during the 6 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSION: We propose that shunting may not be necessary during CEA for high-grade stenosis with contralateral ICA occlusion, presumably because of adequate distal small vessel collaterals.

KW - Carotid endarterectomy

KW - Internal carotid artery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036063062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036063062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00678-X

DO - 10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00678-X

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 325

EP - 330

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 5

ER -