TY - JOUR
T1 - Caregiver-reported outcomes and barriers to care among patients with cleft lip and palate
AU - Bennett, Katelyn G.
AU - Ranganathan, Kavitha
AU - Patterson, Anne K.
AU - Baker, Michaella K.
AU - Vercler, Christian J.
AU - Kasten, Steven J.
AU - Buchman, Steven R.
AU - Waljee, Jennifer F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure: Dr. Bennett is currently supported by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (1F32DE027604-01). Dr. Waljee is supported by Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (E20180672-00). For the remaining authors, there are no financial interests to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: For children with cleft lip and/or palate, access to care is vital for optimizing speech, appearance, and psychosocial outcomes. The authors posited that inadequate access to care negatively impacts outcomes in this population. Methods: Sixty caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate were surveyed to assess perceived barriers using the validated Barriers to Care questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 39 items divided into five subscales, with higher scores indicating fewer barriers. Caregiver-reported outcomes were assessed using the Cleft Evaluation Profile, which captures cleft-specific appearanceand speech-related outcomes. Higher scores correspond to less satisfactory outcomes. Desire for revision surgery was assessed as a binary outcome among caregivers. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationship of barriers to care, caregiver-reported outcomes, and desire for revision, adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates. Results: Sixty percent of caregivers perceived barriers to care, and caregivers who reported poorer access to care described poorer cleft-related outcomes (r2 = 0.19, p = 0.024). Caregivers with poorer skills (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.037), expectations (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.045), and pragmatics (r2 = 0.18, p = 0.026) subscale scores were associated with worse Cleft Evaluation Profile scores. Barriers were also negatively associated with aesthetic item scores (r2 = 0.11, p = 0.025). Finally, caregivers reporting fewer barriers were 21.2 percent less likely to express interest in revision surgery. Conclusions: Barriers to care were associated with poorer appearance-related outcomes and increased interest in revision among caregivers of cleft patients. Enhancing access to care is critical in order to effectively meet goals of care for these families.
AB - Background: For children with cleft lip and/or palate, access to care is vital for optimizing speech, appearance, and psychosocial outcomes. The authors posited that inadequate access to care negatively impacts outcomes in this population. Methods: Sixty caregivers of children with cleft lip and palate were surveyed to assess perceived barriers using the validated Barriers to Care questionnaire. The questionnaire includes 39 items divided into five subscales, with higher scores indicating fewer barriers. Caregiver-reported outcomes were assessed using the Cleft Evaluation Profile, which captures cleft-specific appearanceand speech-related outcomes. Higher scores correspond to less satisfactory outcomes. Desire for revision surgery was assessed as a binary outcome among caregivers. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationship of barriers to care, caregiver-reported outcomes, and desire for revision, adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates. Results: Sixty percent of caregivers perceived barriers to care, and caregivers who reported poorer access to care described poorer cleft-related outcomes (r2 = 0.19, p = 0.024). Caregivers with poorer skills (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.037), expectations (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.045), and pragmatics (r2 = 0.18, p = 0.026) subscale scores were associated with worse Cleft Evaluation Profile scores. Barriers were also negatively associated with aesthetic item scores (r2 = 0.11, p = 0.025). Finally, caregivers reporting fewer barriers were 21.2 percent less likely to express interest in revision surgery. Conclusions: Barriers to care were associated with poorer appearance-related outcomes and increased interest in revision among caregivers of cleft patients. Enhancing access to care is critical in order to effectively meet goals of care for these families.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057567036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057567036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004987
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004987
M3 - Article
C2 - 30489528
AN - SCOPUS:85057567036
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 142
SP - 884E-891E
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 6
ER -