Cardiac Intensive Care Units: What Should be the Standard of Care?

Cecillia Lui, Glenn Whitman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the creation of intensive care units (ICU) in the early 1960s, the central question of how to operate and staff them has continued to be an ongoing discussion. Early studies demonstrated decreased morality when staffing was altered from remote providers to full-time on-site providers. In addition to the shift towards full-time onsite providers, the structure of daily care has also undergone significant paradigm changes. Several studies have revealed the importance and benefit of multidisciplinary rounds with direct and open communication of daily goals. Particularly for cardiac patients in shock, two recent studies have provided hard data demonstrating a significant decrease in mortality in ICUs with full-time onsite providers. This benefit was even more pronounced for patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These data support the practice of intensive care with (1) full-time onsite provider staffing, (2) multidisciplinary rounds, and (3) a safe environment with open communication between team members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Standard of Care
Intensive Care Units
Communication
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Critical Care
Shock
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Cardiac Intensive Care Units : What Should be the Standard of Care? / Lui, Cecillia; Whitman, Glenn.

In: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fad412d5cb5146968199cb912d3eb75e,
title = "Cardiac Intensive Care Units: What Should be the Standard of Care?",
abstract = "Since the creation of intensive care units (ICU) in the early 1960s, the central question of how to operate and staff them has continued to be an ongoing discussion. Early studies demonstrated decreased morality when staffing was altered from remote providers to full-time on-site providers. In addition to the shift towards full-time onsite providers, the structure of daily care has also undergone significant paradigm changes. Several studies have revealed the importance and benefit of multidisciplinary rounds with direct and open communication of daily goals. Particularly for cardiac patients in shock, two recent studies have provided hard data demonstrating a significant decrease in mortality in ICUs with full-time onsite providers. This benefit was even more pronounced for patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These data support the practice of intensive care with (1) full-time onsite provider staffing, (2) multidisciplinary rounds, and (3) a safe environment with open communication between team members.",
author = "Cecillia Lui and Glenn Whitman",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.05.006",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "1043-0679",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac Intensive Care Units

T2 - What Should be the Standard of Care?

AU - Lui, Cecillia

AU - Whitman, Glenn

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Since the creation of intensive care units (ICU) in the early 1960s, the central question of how to operate and staff them has continued to be an ongoing discussion. Early studies demonstrated decreased morality when staffing was altered from remote providers to full-time on-site providers. In addition to the shift towards full-time onsite providers, the structure of daily care has also undergone significant paradigm changes. Several studies have revealed the importance and benefit of multidisciplinary rounds with direct and open communication of daily goals. Particularly for cardiac patients in shock, two recent studies have provided hard data demonstrating a significant decrease in mortality in ICUs with full-time onsite providers. This benefit was even more pronounced for patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These data support the practice of intensive care with (1) full-time onsite provider staffing, (2) multidisciplinary rounds, and (3) a safe environment with open communication between team members.

AB - Since the creation of intensive care units (ICU) in the early 1960s, the central question of how to operate and staff them has continued to be an ongoing discussion. Early studies demonstrated decreased morality when staffing was altered from remote providers to full-time on-site providers. In addition to the shift towards full-time onsite providers, the structure of daily care has also undergone significant paradigm changes. Several studies have revealed the importance and benefit of multidisciplinary rounds with direct and open communication of daily goals. Particularly for cardiac patients in shock, two recent studies have provided hard data demonstrating a significant decrease in mortality in ICUs with full-time onsite providers. This benefit was even more pronounced for patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These data support the practice of intensive care with (1) full-time onsite provider staffing, (2) multidisciplinary rounds, and (3) a safe environment with open communication between team members.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051976239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051976239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.05.006

DO - 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.05.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 29964153

AN - SCOPUS:85051976239

JO - Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 1043-0679

ER -