Canine and incisor microwear in pitheciids and Ateles reflects documented patterns of tooth use

Lucas K. Delezene, Mark F. Teaford, Peter S. Ungar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Platyrrhine species differ in the extent to and the manner in which they use their incisors and canines during food ingestion. For example, Ateles uses its anterior teeth to process mechanically nondemanding soft fruits, while the sclerocarp-harvesting pitheciids rely extensively on these teeth to acquire and process more demanding foods. Pitheciids themselves vary in anterior tooth use, with the pitheciines (Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia) noted to use their robust canines in a variety of ways to predate seeds, while Callicebus, which rarely predates seeds, uses its incisors and exceptionally short canines to scrape tough mesocarp from fruits. To investigate the relationship between tooth use and dental wear, microwear textures were investigated for the anterior teeth of these five genera of platyrrhine primates. Methods: Using a white light confocal microscope, 12 microwear texture attributes that reflect feature size, anisotropy, density, and complexity were recorded from high-resolution epoxy casts of the incisors and canines of adult wild-collected Brazilian specimens of Ateles, Callicebus, Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia. Results: Pitheciine canines tend to have deep microwear features and complex, anisotropic microwear textures, while Ateles anterior teeth tend to have very small features, low feature density, and less complex and anisotropic surfaces. Callicebus incisor and canine microwear is generally intermediate in size and complexity between those extremes. Conclusions: These findings align with expectations from reported field observations of tooth use and illustrate the potential for using microwear texture analysis to infer patterns of anterior tooth use in extinct primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 161:6–25, 2016.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-25
Number of pages20
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume161
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pitheciidae
Atelinae
Incisor
Canidae
Tooth
food
Tooth Wear
Prednisolone
Primates
Fruit
Seeds
Food
Anisotropy

Keywords

  • Callicebus
  • Chiropotes
  • Pithecia
  • sclerocarp
  • seed predation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Medicine(all)
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Canine and incisor microwear in pitheciids and Ateles reflects documented patterns of tooth use. / Delezene, Lucas K.; Teaford, Mark F.; Ungar, Peter S.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 161, No. 1, 01.09.2016, p. 6-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Delezene, Lucas K. ; Teaford, Mark F. ; Ungar, Peter S. / Canine and incisor microwear in pitheciids and Ateles reflects documented patterns of tooth use. In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2016 ; Vol. 161, No. 1. pp. 6-25.
@article{e7895ac310ee467fa710962f5e123fb4,
title = "Canine and incisor microwear in pitheciids and Ateles reflects documented patterns of tooth use",
abstract = "Objectives: Platyrrhine species differ in the extent to and the manner in which they use their incisors and canines during food ingestion. For example, Ateles uses its anterior teeth to process mechanically nondemanding soft fruits, while the sclerocarp-harvesting pitheciids rely extensively on these teeth to acquire and process more demanding foods. Pitheciids themselves vary in anterior tooth use, with the pitheciines (Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia) noted to use their robust canines in a variety of ways to predate seeds, while Callicebus, which rarely predates seeds, uses its incisors and exceptionally short canines to scrape tough mesocarp from fruits. To investigate the relationship between tooth use and dental wear, microwear textures were investigated for the anterior teeth of these five genera of platyrrhine primates. Methods: Using a white light confocal microscope, 12 microwear texture attributes that reflect feature size, anisotropy, density, and complexity were recorded from high-resolution epoxy casts of the incisors and canines of adult wild-collected Brazilian specimens of Ateles, Callicebus, Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia. Results: Pitheciine canines tend to have deep microwear features and complex, anisotropic microwear textures, while Ateles anterior teeth tend to have very small features, low feature density, and less complex and anisotropic surfaces. Callicebus incisor and canine microwear is generally intermediate in size and complexity between those extremes. Conclusions: These findings align with expectations from reported field observations of tooth use and illustrate the potential for using microwear texture analysis to infer patterns of anterior tooth use in extinct primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 161:6–25, 2016.",
keywords = "Callicebus, Chiropotes, Pithecia, sclerocarp, seed predation",
author = "Delezene, {Lucas K.} and Teaford, {Mark F.} and Ungar, {Peter S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.23002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "161",
pages = "6--25",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Canine and incisor microwear in pitheciids and Ateles reflects documented patterns of tooth use

AU - Delezene, Lucas K.

AU - Teaford, Mark F.

AU - Ungar, Peter S.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objectives: Platyrrhine species differ in the extent to and the manner in which they use their incisors and canines during food ingestion. For example, Ateles uses its anterior teeth to process mechanically nondemanding soft fruits, while the sclerocarp-harvesting pitheciids rely extensively on these teeth to acquire and process more demanding foods. Pitheciids themselves vary in anterior tooth use, with the pitheciines (Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia) noted to use their robust canines in a variety of ways to predate seeds, while Callicebus, which rarely predates seeds, uses its incisors and exceptionally short canines to scrape tough mesocarp from fruits. To investigate the relationship between tooth use and dental wear, microwear textures were investigated for the anterior teeth of these five genera of platyrrhine primates. Methods: Using a white light confocal microscope, 12 microwear texture attributes that reflect feature size, anisotropy, density, and complexity were recorded from high-resolution epoxy casts of the incisors and canines of adult wild-collected Brazilian specimens of Ateles, Callicebus, Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia. Results: Pitheciine canines tend to have deep microwear features and complex, anisotropic microwear textures, while Ateles anterior teeth tend to have very small features, low feature density, and less complex and anisotropic surfaces. Callicebus incisor and canine microwear is generally intermediate in size and complexity between those extremes. Conclusions: These findings align with expectations from reported field observations of tooth use and illustrate the potential for using microwear texture analysis to infer patterns of anterior tooth use in extinct primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 161:6–25, 2016.

AB - Objectives: Platyrrhine species differ in the extent to and the manner in which they use their incisors and canines during food ingestion. For example, Ateles uses its anterior teeth to process mechanically nondemanding soft fruits, while the sclerocarp-harvesting pitheciids rely extensively on these teeth to acquire and process more demanding foods. Pitheciids themselves vary in anterior tooth use, with the pitheciines (Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia) noted to use their robust canines in a variety of ways to predate seeds, while Callicebus, which rarely predates seeds, uses its incisors and exceptionally short canines to scrape tough mesocarp from fruits. To investigate the relationship between tooth use and dental wear, microwear textures were investigated for the anterior teeth of these five genera of platyrrhine primates. Methods: Using a white light confocal microscope, 12 microwear texture attributes that reflect feature size, anisotropy, density, and complexity were recorded from high-resolution epoxy casts of the incisors and canines of adult wild-collected Brazilian specimens of Ateles, Callicebus, Cacajao, Chiropotes, and Pithecia. Results: Pitheciine canines tend to have deep microwear features and complex, anisotropic microwear textures, while Ateles anterior teeth tend to have very small features, low feature density, and less complex and anisotropic surfaces. Callicebus incisor and canine microwear is generally intermediate in size and complexity between those extremes. Conclusions: These findings align with expectations from reported field observations of tooth use and illustrate the potential for using microwear texture analysis to infer patterns of anterior tooth use in extinct primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 161:6–25, 2016.

KW - Callicebus

KW - Chiropotes

KW - Pithecia

KW - sclerocarp

KW - seed predation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982235350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982235350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.23002

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.23002

M3 - Article

C2 - 27224026

AN - SCOPUS:84982235350

VL - 161

SP - 6

EP - 25

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 1

ER -