Cancer and systemic sclerosis: Novel insights into pathogenesis and clinical implications

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of review: Most epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an increased risk of cancer in scleroderma patients. Reasons for this risk increase have been poorly understood and often attributed to cytotoxic therapies or damage from scleroderma. Recognition that some patients have a close temporal relationship between cancer diagnosis and scleroderma clinical onset has focused attention on the possibility that scleroderma may be a paraneoplastic syndrome in a subset of patients. This review will discuss the latest epidemiologic data linking cancer and scleroderma and explore a model for the development of paraneoplastic scleroderma. Recent findings: New investigations have demonstrated an association between RNA polymerase III autoantibodies and a close temporal relationship between cancer diagnosis and the development of clinical scleroderma. A unique nucleolar RNA polymerase III expression pattern has been identified in malignant tissue from these scleroderma patients suggesting that autoantigen expression in the cancer and the autoantibody response are associated. Similar data in inflammatory myositis have illustrated that diseasespecific autoantigens may be expressed in cancers and damaged target tissues (muscle) undergoing regeneration. Summary: These data suggest a model of paraneoplastic autoimmunity in which cross-reactive immune responses may target autoantigens that are expressed in both cancers and diseased autoimmune target tissues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)530-535
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent opinion in rheumatology
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Keywords

  • Autoantibodies
  • Cancer
  • Paraneoplastic
  • Systemic sclerosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer and systemic sclerosis: Novel insights into pathogenesis and clinical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this