Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events?

Junya Zhu, Sherri O. Stuver, Arnold M. Epstein, Eric C. Schneider, Joel S. Weissman, Saul N. Weingart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that patients can report a variety of adverse events (AEs) not captured by traditional methods such as a chart review. Little is known, however, about whether patient reports are useful for measuring patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To examine the degree to which physician reviewers agreed that patient reports of "negative effects" constituted AEs, and to identify questionnaire items that affected reviewers' judgments. METHODS: We surveyed patients discharged from Massachusetts hospitals in 2003 to elicit information about negative effects associated with hospitalization. Physician reviewers judged whether patient-reported negative effects represented AEs, and classified the severity of the event. Likelihood ratios were calculated to assess whether patient responses to questionnaire items affected reviewers' judgments. RESULTS: Of the 2582 patients surveyed, 753 patients reported 1170 negative effects, and 71.2% of these effects were classified as AEs by physician reviewers. Negative effects most likely to be classified as AEs involved newly prescribed medications and changes to previously prescribed medications. Additional information elicited from follow-up survey questions modestly affected reviewers' classification of serious AEs. Negative effects reported by women, younger patients, those reporting better health status, and those not admitted through the emergency department were more likely to be classified as AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients were able to identify care-related AEs. Patient responses to questions about the sequelae of the events provided limited additional information for physicians to use in gauging the presence and severity of the event. Patient reports complement other incident-detection methods by providing information that is credible and unavailable from other sources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)948-955
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Care
Volume49
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physicians
Patient Safety
Health Status
Hospital Emergency Service
Hospitalization
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • adverse events
  • complication
  • patient safety
  • patient surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Zhu, J., Stuver, S. O., Epstein, A. M., Schneider, E. C., Weissman, J. S., & Weingart, S. N. (2011). Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events? Medical Care, 49(10), 948-955. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822047a8

Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events? / Zhu, Junya; Stuver, Sherri O.; Epstein, Arnold M.; Schneider, Eric C.; Weissman, Joel S.; Weingart, Saul N.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 49, No. 10, 10.2011, p. 948-955.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhu, J, Stuver, SO, Epstein, AM, Schneider, EC, Weissman, JS & Weingart, SN 2011, 'Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events?', Medical Care, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 948-955. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822047a8
Zhu J, Stuver SO, Epstein AM, Schneider EC, Weissman JS, Weingart SN. Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events? Medical Care. 2011 Oct;49(10):948-955. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822047a8
Zhu, Junya ; Stuver, Sherri O. ; Epstein, Arnold M. ; Schneider, Eric C. ; Weissman, Joel S. ; Weingart, Saul N. / Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events?. In: Medical Care. 2011 ; Vol. 49, No. 10. pp. 948-955.
@article{4cf24b202aad4d60a3c3db862e1442b4,
title = "Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that patients can report a variety of adverse events (AEs) not captured by traditional methods such as a chart review. Little is known, however, about whether patient reports are useful for measuring patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To examine the degree to which physician reviewers agreed that patient reports of {"}negative effects{"} constituted AEs, and to identify questionnaire items that affected reviewers' judgments. METHODS: We surveyed patients discharged from Massachusetts hospitals in 2003 to elicit information about negative effects associated with hospitalization. Physician reviewers judged whether patient-reported negative effects represented AEs, and classified the severity of the event. Likelihood ratios were calculated to assess whether patient responses to questionnaire items affected reviewers' judgments. RESULTS: Of the 2582 patients surveyed, 753 patients reported 1170 negative effects, and 71.2{\%} of these effects were classified as AEs by physician reviewers. Negative effects most likely to be classified as AEs involved newly prescribed medications and changes to previously prescribed medications. Additional information elicited from follow-up survey questions modestly affected reviewers' classification of serious AEs. Negative effects reported by women, younger patients, those reporting better health status, and those not admitted through the emergency department were more likely to be classified as AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients were able to identify care-related AEs. Patient responses to questions about the sequelae of the events provided limited additional information for physicians to use in gauging the presence and severity of the event. Patient reports complement other incident-detection methods by providing information that is credible and unavailable from other sources.",
keywords = "adverse events, complication, patient safety, patient surveys",
author = "Junya Zhu and Stuver, {Sherri O.} and Epstein, {Arnold M.} and Schneider, {Eric C.} and Weissman, {Joel S.} and Weingart, {Saul N.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822047a8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "948--955",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can we rely on patients' reports of adverse events?

AU - Zhu, Junya

AU - Stuver, Sherri O.

AU - Epstein, Arnold M.

AU - Schneider, Eric C.

AU - Weissman, Joel S.

AU - Weingart, Saul N.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that patients can report a variety of adverse events (AEs) not captured by traditional methods such as a chart review. Little is known, however, about whether patient reports are useful for measuring patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To examine the degree to which physician reviewers agreed that patient reports of "negative effects" constituted AEs, and to identify questionnaire items that affected reviewers' judgments. METHODS: We surveyed patients discharged from Massachusetts hospitals in 2003 to elicit information about negative effects associated with hospitalization. Physician reviewers judged whether patient-reported negative effects represented AEs, and classified the severity of the event. Likelihood ratios were calculated to assess whether patient responses to questionnaire items affected reviewers' judgments. RESULTS: Of the 2582 patients surveyed, 753 patients reported 1170 negative effects, and 71.2% of these effects were classified as AEs by physician reviewers. Negative effects most likely to be classified as AEs involved newly prescribed medications and changes to previously prescribed medications. Additional information elicited from follow-up survey questions modestly affected reviewers' classification of serious AEs. Negative effects reported by women, younger patients, those reporting better health status, and those not admitted through the emergency department were more likely to be classified as AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients were able to identify care-related AEs. Patient responses to questions about the sequelae of the events provided limited additional information for physicians to use in gauging the presence and severity of the event. Patient reports complement other incident-detection methods by providing information that is credible and unavailable from other sources.

AB - BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that patients can report a variety of adverse events (AEs) not captured by traditional methods such as a chart review. Little is known, however, about whether patient reports are useful for measuring patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To examine the degree to which physician reviewers agreed that patient reports of "negative effects" constituted AEs, and to identify questionnaire items that affected reviewers' judgments. METHODS: We surveyed patients discharged from Massachusetts hospitals in 2003 to elicit information about negative effects associated with hospitalization. Physician reviewers judged whether patient-reported negative effects represented AEs, and classified the severity of the event. Likelihood ratios were calculated to assess whether patient responses to questionnaire items affected reviewers' judgments. RESULTS: Of the 2582 patients surveyed, 753 patients reported 1170 negative effects, and 71.2% of these effects were classified as AEs by physician reviewers. Negative effects most likely to be classified as AEs involved newly prescribed medications and changes to previously prescribed medications. Additional information elicited from follow-up survey questions modestly affected reviewers' classification of serious AEs. Negative effects reported by women, younger patients, those reporting better health status, and those not admitted through the emergency department were more likely to be classified as AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients were able to identify care-related AEs. Patient responses to questions about the sequelae of the events provided limited additional information for physicians to use in gauging the presence and severity of the event. Patient reports complement other incident-detection methods by providing information that is credible and unavailable from other sources.

KW - adverse events

KW - complication

KW - patient safety

KW - patient surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052935517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052935517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822047a8

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822047a8

M3 - Article

C2 - 21642876

AN - SCOPUS:80052935517

VL - 49

SP - 948

EP - 955

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 10

ER -