Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?

John F P Bridges, Elizabeth T. Kinter, Annette Schmeding, Ina Rudolph, Axel Mühlbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness associated with hallucinations, delusions, apathy, poor social functioning, and impaired cognition. Researchers and funders have been hesitant to focus efforts on treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia because of the perceived cognitive burden that research methods, such as conjoint analysis, place on them. Objective: The objective of this study was to test if patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were able to complete a choice-based conjoint analysis (often referred to as discrete-choice experiments) and to test if meaningful trade-offs were being made. Methods: German outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were eligible to participate in this study if they were aged 18-65 years, had received treatment for at least 1 year and were not experiencing acute symptoms. Conjoint analysis tasks were based on six attributes, each with two levels, which were identified via a literature review and focus groups. A psychologist in a professional interview facility presented each respondent with the eight tasks with little explanation. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to verify that respondents understood the tasks. Preferences were assessed using logistic regression, with a correction for clustering. Results: We found evidence that the 21 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia participating in the study could complete conjoint analysis tasks in a meaningful way. Patients not only related to the scenarios presented in conjoint tasks, but explicitly stated that they used their own preferences to judge which scenarios were better. Statistical analysis confirmed all hypotheses about the attributes (i.e. all attributes had the expected sign). Having a supportive physician, not feeling slowed, and improvements in stressful situations (p <0.01) were the most important attributes. Conclusions: We found that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia can complete conjoint analysis tasks, that they base their decisions on their own preferences, and that patients make trade-offs between attributes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-275
Number of pages9
JournalPatient
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Patient Preference
Interviews
Apathy
Delusions
Hallucinations
Focus Groups
Cognition
Cluster Analysis
Emotions
Outpatients
Logistic Models
Research Personnel
Psychology
Physicians
Therapeutics
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Conjoint-analysis
  • Patient-preference
  • Schizophrenia.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Bridges, J. F. P., Kinter, E. T., Schmeding, A., Rudolph, I., & Mühlbacher, A. (2011). Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks? Patient, 4(4), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000

Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks? / Bridges, John F P; Kinter, Elizabeth T.; Schmeding, Annette; Rudolph, Ina; Mühlbacher, Axel.

In: Patient, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2011, p. 267-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bridges, JFP, Kinter, ET, Schmeding, A, Rudolph, I & Mühlbacher, A 2011, 'Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?', Patient, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 267-275. https://doi.org/10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000
Bridges, John F P ; Kinter, Elizabeth T. ; Schmeding, Annette ; Rudolph, Ina ; Mühlbacher, Axel. / Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?. In: Patient. 2011 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 267-275.
@article{1a0efff3e51b4dc0bd04413dddaebd89,
title = "Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?",
abstract = "Background: Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness associated with hallucinations, delusions, apathy, poor social functioning, and impaired cognition. Researchers and funders have been hesitant to focus efforts on treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia because of the perceived cognitive burden that research methods, such as conjoint analysis, place on them. Objective: The objective of this study was to test if patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were able to complete a choice-based conjoint analysis (often referred to as discrete-choice experiments) and to test if meaningful trade-offs were being made. Methods: German outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were eligible to participate in this study if they were aged 18-65 years, had received treatment for at least 1 year and were not experiencing acute symptoms. Conjoint analysis tasks were based on six attributes, each with two levels, which were identified via a literature review and focus groups. A psychologist in a professional interview facility presented each respondent with the eight tasks with little explanation. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to verify that respondents understood the tasks. Preferences were assessed using logistic regression, with a correction for clustering. Results: We found evidence that the 21 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia participating in the study could complete conjoint analysis tasks in a meaningful way. Patients not only related to the scenarios presented in conjoint tasks, but explicitly stated that they used their own preferences to judge which scenarios were better. Statistical analysis confirmed all hypotheses about the attributes (i.e. all attributes had the expected sign). Having a supportive physician, not feeling slowed, and improvements in stressful situations (p <0.01) were the most important attributes. Conclusions: We found that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia can complete conjoint analysis tasks, that they base their decisions on their own preferences, and that patients make trade-offs between attributes.",
keywords = "Conjoint-analysis, Patient-preference, Schizophrenia.",
author = "Bridges, {John F P} and Kinter, {Elizabeth T.} and Annette Schmeding and Ina Rudolph and Axel M{\"u}hlbacher",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "267--275",
journal = "Patient",
issn = "1178-1653",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?

AU - Bridges, John F P

AU - Kinter, Elizabeth T.

AU - Schmeding, Annette

AU - Rudolph, Ina

AU - Mühlbacher, Axel

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness associated with hallucinations, delusions, apathy, poor social functioning, and impaired cognition. Researchers and funders have been hesitant to focus efforts on treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia because of the perceived cognitive burden that research methods, such as conjoint analysis, place on them. Objective: The objective of this study was to test if patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were able to complete a choice-based conjoint analysis (often referred to as discrete-choice experiments) and to test if meaningful trade-offs were being made. Methods: German outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were eligible to participate in this study if they were aged 18-65 years, had received treatment for at least 1 year and were not experiencing acute symptoms. Conjoint analysis tasks were based on six attributes, each with two levels, which were identified via a literature review and focus groups. A psychologist in a professional interview facility presented each respondent with the eight tasks with little explanation. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to verify that respondents understood the tasks. Preferences were assessed using logistic regression, with a correction for clustering. Results: We found evidence that the 21 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia participating in the study could complete conjoint analysis tasks in a meaningful way. Patients not only related to the scenarios presented in conjoint tasks, but explicitly stated that they used their own preferences to judge which scenarios were better. Statistical analysis confirmed all hypotheses about the attributes (i.e. all attributes had the expected sign). Having a supportive physician, not feeling slowed, and improvements in stressful situations (p <0.01) were the most important attributes. Conclusions: We found that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia can complete conjoint analysis tasks, that they base their decisions on their own preferences, and that patients make trade-offs between attributes.

AB - Background: Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness associated with hallucinations, delusions, apathy, poor social functioning, and impaired cognition. Researchers and funders have been hesitant to focus efforts on treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia because of the perceived cognitive burden that research methods, such as conjoint analysis, place on them. Objective: The objective of this study was to test if patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were able to complete a choice-based conjoint analysis (often referred to as discrete-choice experiments) and to test if meaningful trade-offs were being made. Methods: German outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were eligible to participate in this study if they were aged 18-65 years, had received treatment for at least 1 year and were not experiencing acute symptoms. Conjoint analysis tasks were based on six attributes, each with two levels, which were identified via a literature review and focus groups. A psychologist in a professional interview facility presented each respondent with the eight tasks with little explanation. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to verify that respondents understood the tasks. Preferences were assessed using logistic regression, with a correction for clustering. Results: We found evidence that the 21 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia participating in the study could complete conjoint analysis tasks in a meaningful way. Patients not only related to the scenarios presented in conjoint tasks, but explicitly stated that they used their own preferences to judge which scenarios were better. Statistical analysis confirmed all hypotheses about the attributes (i.e. all attributes had the expected sign). Having a supportive physician, not feeling slowed, and improvements in stressful situations (p <0.01) were the most important attributes. Conclusions: We found that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia can complete conjoint analysis tasks, that they base their decisions on their own preferences, and that patients make trade-offs between attributes.

KW - Conjoint-analysis

KW - Patient-preference

KW - Schizophrenia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054107929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054107929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000

DO - 10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 267

EP - 275

JO - Patient

JF - Patient

SN - 1178-1653

IS - 4

ER -