Can mental health treatments help prevent or reduce intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review

Wietse Anton Tol, Sarah Murray, C. Lund, Paul A Bolton, Laura Murray, T. Davies, J. Haushofer, K. Orkin, M. Witte, L. Salama, V. Patel, G. Thornicroft, Judith Bass

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological research suggests an interrelationship between mental health problems and the (re)occurrence of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, little is known about the impact of mental health treatments on IPV victimization or perpetration, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify prospective, controlled studies of mental health treatments in LMIC. We defined 'mental health treatment' as an intervention for individuals experiencing mental ill health (including substance misuse) including a substantial psychosocial or pharmacological component. Studies had to measure a mental health and IPV outcome. We searched across multi-disciplinary databases using a structured search strategy. Screening of title/abstracts and full-text eligibility assessments were conducted by two researchers independently, data were extracted using a piloted spreadsheet, and a narrative synthesis was generated. Results: We identified seven studies reported in 11 papers conducted in five middle-income countries. With the exception of blinding, studies overall showed acceptable levels of risk of bias. Four of the seven studies focused on dedicated mental health treatments in various populations, including: common mental disorders in earthquake survivors; depression in primary care; alcohol misuse in men; and alcohol misuse in female adult sex workers. The dedicated mental health treatments targeting depression or alcohol misuse consistently reduced levels of these outcomes. The two studies targeting depression also reduced short-term IPV, but no IPV benefits were identified in the two alcohol-focused studies. The other three studies evaluated integrated interventions, in which a focus on substance misuse was part of efforts to reduce HIV/AIDS and violence against particularly vulnerable women. In contrast to the dedicated mental health interventions, the integrated interventions did not consistently reduce mental ill health or alcohol misuse compared to control conditions. Conclusions: Too few studies have been conducted to judge whether mental health treatments may provide a beneficial strategy to prevent or reduce IPV in LMIC. Key future research questions include: whether promising initial evidence on the effects of depression interventions on reducing IPV hold more broadly, the required intensity of mental health components in integrated interventions, and the identification of mechanisms of IPV that are amenable to mental health intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number728
JournalBMC Women's Health
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 14 2019

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Alcohols
Therapeutics
Depression
Intimate Partner Violence
Earthquakes
Sex Workers
Crime Victims
Violence
Mental Disorders
Survivors
Primary Health Care
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Research Personnel
HIV
Databases
Prospective Studies
Pharmacology

Keywords

  • Intimate partner violence
  • Low- and middle-income countries
  • Mental health
  • Multisectoral interventions
  • Systematic review
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Can mental health treatments help prevent or reduce intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review. / Tol, Wietse Anton; Murray, Sarah; Lund, C.; Bolton, Paul A; Murray, Laura; Davies, T.; Haushofer, J.; Orkin, K.; Witte, M.; Salama, L.; Patel, V.; Thornicroft, G.; Bass, Judith.

In: BMC Women's Health, Vol. 19, No. 1, 728, 14.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{c3c0da220d134ef591796ddad86b4030,
title = "Can mental health treatments help prevent or reduce intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Epidemiological research suggests an interrelationship between mental health problems and the (re)occurrence of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, little is known about the impact of mental health treatments on IPV victimization or perpetration, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify prospective, controlled studies of mental health treatments in LMIC. We defined 'mental health treatment' as an intervention for individuals experiencing mental ill health (including substance misuse) including a substantial psychosocial or pharmacological component. Studies had to measure a mental health and IPV outcome. We searched across multi-disciplinary databases using a structured search strategy. Screening of title/abstracts and full-text eligibility assessments were conducted by two researchers independently, data were extracted using a piloted spreadsheet, and a narrative synthesis was generated. Results: We identified seven studies reported in 11 papers conducted in five middle-income countries. With the exception of blinding, studies overall showed acceptable levels of risk of bias. Four of the seven studies focused on dedicated mental health treatments in various populations, including: common mental disorders in earthquake survivors; depression in primary care; alcohol misuse in men; and alcohol misuse in female adult sex workers. The dedicated mental health treatments targeting depression or alcohol misuse consistently reduced levels of these outcomes. The two studies targeting depression also reduced short-term IPV, but no IPV benefits were identified in the two alcohol-focused studies. The other three studies evaluated integrated interventions, in which a focus on substance misuse was part of efforts to reduce HIV/AIDS and violence against particularly vulnerable women. In contrast to the dedicated mental health interventions, the integrated interventions did not consistently reduce mental ill health or alcohol misuse compared to control conditions. Conclusions: Too few studies have been conducted to judge whether mental health treatments may provide a beneficial strategy to prevent or reduce IPV in LMIC. Key future research questions include: whether promising initial evidence on the effects of depression interventions on reducing IPV hold more broadly, the required intensity of mental health components in integrated interventions, and the identification of mechanisms of IPV that are amenable to mental health intervention.",
keywords = "Intimate partner violence, Low- and middle-income countries, Mental health, Multisectoral interventions, Systematic review, Treatment",
author = "Tol, {Wietse Anton} and Sarah Murray and C. Lund and Bolton, {Paul A} and Laura Murray and T. Davies and J. Haushofer and K. Orkin and M. Witte and L. Salama and V. Patel and G. Thornicroft and Judith Bass",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/s12905-019-0728-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "BMC Women's Health",
issn = "1472-6874",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can mental health treatments help prevent or reduce intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review

AU - Tol, Wietse Anton

AU - Murray, Sarah

AU - Lund, C.

AU - Bolton, Paul A

AU - Murray, Laura

AU - Davies, T.

AU - Haushofer, J.

AU - Orkin, K.

AU - Witte, M.

AU - Salama, L.

AU - Patel, V.

AU - Thornicroft, G.

AU - Bass, Judith

PY - 2019/2/14

Y1 - 2019/2/14

N2 - Background: Epidemiological research suggests an interrelationship between mental health problems and the (re)occurrence of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, little is known about the impact of mental health treatments on IPV victimization or perpetration, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify prospective, controlled studies of mental health treatments in LMIC. We defined 'mental health treatment' as an intervention for individuals experiencing mental ill health (including substance misuse) including a substantial psychosocial or pharmacological component. Studies had to measure a mental health and IPV outcome. We searched across multi-disciplinary databases using a structured search strategy. Screening of title/abstracts and full-text eligibility assessments were conducted by two researchers independently, data were extracted using a piloted spreadsheet, and a narrative synthesis was generated. Results: We identified seven studies reported in 11 papers conducted in five middle-income countries. With the exception of blinding, studies overall showed acceptable levels of risk of bias. Four of the seven studies focused on dedicated mental health treatments in various populations, including: common mental disorders in earthquake survivors; depression in primary care; alcohol misuse in men; and alcohol misuse in female adult sex workers. The dedicated mental health treatments targeting depression or alcohol misuse consistently reduced levels of these outcomes. The two studies targeting depression also reduced short-term IPV, but no IPV benefits were identified in the two alcohol-focused studies. The other three studies evaluated integrated interventions, in which a focus on substance misuse was part of efforts to reduce HIV/AIDS and violence against particularly vulnerable women. In contrast to the dedicated mental health interventions, the integrated interventions did not consistently reduce mental ill health or alcohol misuse compared to control conditions. Conclusions: Too few studies have been conducted to judge whether mental health treatments may provide a beneficial strategy to prevent or reduce IPV in LMIC. Key future research questions include: whether promising initial evidence on the effects of depression interventions on reducing IPV hold more broadly, the required intensity of mental health components in integrated interventions, and the identification of mechanisms of IPV that are amenable to mental health intervention.

AB - Background: Epidemiological research suggests an interrelationship between mental health problems and the (re)occurrence of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, little is known about the impact of mental health treatments on IPV victimization or perpetration, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify prospective, controlled studies of mental health treatments in LMIC. We defined 'mental health treatment' as an intervention for individuals experiencing mental ill health (including substance misuse) including a substantial psychosocial or pharmacological component. Studies had to measure a mental health and IPV outcome. We searched across multi-disciplinary databases using a structured search strategy. Screening of title/abstracts and full-text eligibility assessments were conducted by two researchers independently, data were extracted using a piloted spreadsheet, and a narrative synthesis was generated. Results: We identified seven studies reported in 11 papers conducted in five middle-income countries. With the exception of blinding, studies overall showed acceptable levels of risk of bias. Four of the seven studies focused on dedicated mental health treatments in various populations, including: common mental disorders in earthquake survivors; depression in primary care; alcohol misuse in men; and alcohol misuse in female adult sex workers. The dedicated mental health treatments targeting depression or alcohol misuse consistently reduced levels of these outcomes. The two studies targeting depression also reduced short-term IPV, but no IPV benefits were identified in the two alcohol-focused studies. The other three studies evaluated integrated interventions, in which a focus on substance misuse was part of efforts to reduce HIV/AIDS and violence against particularly vulnerable women. In contrast to the dedicated mental health interventions, the integrated interventions did not consistently reduce mental ill health or alcohol misuse compared to control conditions. Conclusions: Too few studies have been conducted to judge whether mental health treatments may provide a beneficial strategy to prevent or reduce IPV in LMIC. Key future research questions include: whether promising initial evidence on the effects of depression interventions on reducing IPV hold more broadly, the required intensity of mental health components in integrated interventions, and the identification of mechanisms of IPV that are amenable to mental health intervention.

KW - Intimate partner violence

KW - Low- and middle-income countries

KW - Mental health

KW - Multisectoral interventions

KW - Systematic review

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061557550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061557550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12905-019-0728-z

DO - 10.1186/s12905-019-0728-z

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30764813

AN - SCOPUS:85061557550

VL - 19

JO - BMC Women's Health

JF - BMC Women's Health

SN - 1472-6874

IS - 1

M1 - 728

ER -