Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?

Karolina M. Lempert, Joanna E. Steinglass, Anthony Pinto, Joseph W. Kable, Helen Blair Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The National Institute of Mental Health launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative to better understand dimensions of behavior and identify targets for treatment. Examining dimensions across psychiatric illnesses has proven challenging, as reliable behavioral paradigms that are known to engage specific neural circuits and translate across diagnostic populations are scarce. Delay discounting paradigms seem to be an exception: They are useful for understanding links between neural systems and behavior in healthy individuals, with potential for assessing how these mechanisms go awry in psychiatric illnesses. This article reviews relevant literature on delay discounting (or the rate at which the value of a reward decreases as the delay to receipt increases) in humans, including methods for examining it, its putative neural mechanisms, and its application in psychiatric research. There exist rigorous and reproducible paradigms to evaluate delay discounting, standard methods for calculating discount rate, and known neural systems probed by these paradigms. Abnormalities in discounting have been associated with psychopathology ranging from addiction (with steep discount rates indicating relative preference for immediate rewards) to anorexia nervosa (with shallow discount rates indicating preference for future rewards). The latest research suggests that delay discounting can be manipulated in the laboratory. Extensively studied in cognitive neuroscience, delay discounting assesses a dimension of behavior that is important for decision-making and is linked to neural substrates and to psychopathology. The question now is whether manipulating delay discounting can yield clinically significant changes in behavior that promote health. If so, then delay discounting could deliver on the RDoC promise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-199
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological medicine
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research
Reward
Psychiatry
Psychopathology
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Anorexia Nervosa
Delay Discounting
Decision Making
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • decision-making
  • delay discounting
  • impulsivity
  • intertemporal choice
  • RDoC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Lempert, K. M., Steinglass, J. E., Pinto, A., Kable, J. W., & Simpson, H. B. (2019). Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC? Psychological medicine, 49(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001770

Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC? / Lempert, Karolina M.; Steinglass, Joanna E.; Pinto, Anthony; Kable, Joseph W.; Simpson, Helen Blair.

In: Psychological medicine, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 190-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Lempert, KM, Steinglass, JE, Pinto, A, Kable, JW & Simpson, HB 2019, 'Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?', Psychological medicine, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 190-199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001770
Lempert, Karolina M. ; Steinglass, Joanna E. ; Pinto, Anthony ; Kable, Joseph W. ; Simpson, Helen Blair. / Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?. In: Psychological medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 190-199.
@article{daaacc0573fa490089b40fd3f6baa705,
title = "Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?",
abstract = "The National Institute of Mental Health launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative to better understand dimensions of behavior and identify targets for treatment. Examining dimensions across psychiatric illnesses has proven challenging, as reliable behavioral paradigms that are known to engage specific neural circuits and translate across diagnostic populations are scarce. Delay discounting paradigms seem to be an exception: They are useful for understanding links between neural systems and behavior in healthy individuals, with potential for assessing how these mechanisms go awry in psychiatric illnesses. This article reviews relevant literature on delay discounting (or the rate at which the value of a reward decreases as the delay to receipt increases) in humans, including methods for examining it, its putative neural mechanisms, and its application in psychiatric research. There exist rigorous and reproducible paradigms to evaluate delay discounting, standard methods for calculating discount rate, and known neural systems probed by these paradigms. Abnormalities in discounting have been associated with psychopathology ranging from addiction (with steep discount rates indicating relative preference for immediate rewards) to anorexia nervosa (with shallow discount rates indicating preference for future rewards). The latest research suggests that delay discounting can be manipulated in the laboratory. Extensively studied in cognitive neuroscience, delay discounting assesses a dimension of behavior that is important for decision-making and is linked to neural substrates and to psychopathology. The question now is whether manipulating delay discounting can yield clinically significant changes in behavior that promote health. If so, then delay discounting could deliver on the RDoC promise.",
keywords = "Cognitive neuroscience, decision-making, delay discounting, impulsivity, intertemporal choice, RDoC",
author = "Lempert, {Karolina M.} and Steinglass, {Joanna E.} and Anthony Pinto and Kable, {Joseph W.} and Simpson, {Helen Blair}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0033291718001770",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "190--199",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?

AU - Lempert, Karolina M.

AU - Steinglass, Joanna E.

AU - Pinto, Anthony

AU - Kable, Joseph W.

AU - Simpson, Helen Blair

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The National Institute of Mental Health launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative to better understand dimensions of behavior and identify targets for treatment. Examining dimensions across psychiatric illnesses has proven challenging, as reliable behavioral paradigms that are known to engage specific neural circuits and translate across diagnostic populations are scarce. Delay discounting paradigms seem to be an exception: They are useful for understanding links between neural systems and behavior in healthy individuals, with potential for assessing how these mechanisms go awry in psychiatric illnesses. This article reviews relevant literature on delay discounting (or the rate at which the value of a reward decreases as the delay to receipt increases) in humans, including methods for examining it, its putative neural mechanisms, and its application in psychiatric research. There exist rigorous and reproducible paradigms to evaluate delay discounting, standard methods for calculating discount rate, and known neural systems probed by these paradigms. Abnormalities in discounting have been associated with psychopathology ranging from addiction (with steep discount rates indicating relative preference for immediate rewards) to anorexia nervosa (with shallow discount rates indicating preference for future rewards). The latest research suggests that delay discounting can be manipulated in the laboratory. Extensively studied in cognitive neuroscience, delay discounting assesses a dimension of behavior that is important for decision-making and is linked to neural substrates and to psychopathology. The question now is whether manipulating delay discounting can yield clinically significant changes in behavior that promote health. If so, then delay discounting could deliver on the RDoC promise.

AB - The National Institute of Mental Health launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative to better understand dimensions of behavior and identify targets for treatment. Examining dimensions across psychiatric illnesses has proven challenging, as reliable behavioral paradigms that are known to engage specific neural circuits and translate across diagnostic populations are scarce. Delay discounting paradigms seem to be an exception: They are useful for understanding links between neural systems and behavior in healthy individuals, with potential for assessing how these mechanisms go awry in psychiatric illnesses. This article reviews relevant literature on delay discounting (or the rate at which the value of a reward decreases as the delay to receipt increases) in humans, including methods for examining it, its putative neural mechanisms, and its application in psychiatric research. There exist rigorous and reproducible paradigms to evaluate delay discounting, standard methods for calculating discount rate, and known neural systems probed by these paradigms. Abnormalities in discounting have been associated with psychopathology ranging from addiction (with steep discount rates indicating relative preference for immediate rewards) to anorexia nervosa (with shallow discount rates indicating preference for future rewards). The latest research suggests that delay discounting can be manipulated in the laboratory. Extensively studied in cognitive neuroscience, delay discounting assesses a dimension of behavior that is important for decision-making and is linked to neural substrates and to psychopathology. The question now is whether manipulating delay discounting can yield clinically significant changes in behavior that promote health. If so, then delay discounting could deliver on the RDoC promise.

KW - Cognitive neuroscience

KW - decision-making

KW - delay discounting

KW - impulsivity

KW - intertemporal choice

KW - RDoC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058872005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058872005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291718001770

DO - 10.1017/S0033291718001770

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30070191

AN - SCOPUS:85058872005

VL - 49

SP - 190

EP - 199

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 2

ER -