Can cervicography be improved? An evaluation with arbitrated cervicography interpretations

Diana L. Schneider, Louis Burke, Thomas C. Wright, Mark Spitzer, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Sholom Wacholder, Rolando Herrero, Maria C. Bratti, Mitchell D. Greenberg, Allan Hildesheim, Mark E. Sherman, Jorge Morales, Martha L. Hutchinson, Mario Alfaro, Attila Lörincz, Mark Schiffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the optimal performance of cervicography. We compared an arbitrated cervigram classification with an arbitrated referent diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: From an initial group of 8460 women, a stratified sample of cervigrams from 3645 women and histologic information from 414 women underwent arbitration. Interobserver agreement was assessed for cervicography and the referent diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were estimated for initial and arbitrated cervicography results, compared with the initial and arbitrated referent diagnoses. RESULTS: For the detection of arbitrated high-grade lesions or cancer, arbitrated cervicography yielded an overall sensitivity of 63.9% and a specificity of 93.7%. Significantly higher sensitivity was associated with younger age and age-related visual characteristics. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the cervigram classification improved performance over a single interpretation in this population but suggested the limits of static visual screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-23
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume187
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer
  • Cervical neoplasia
  • Cervicography
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Can cervicography be improved? An evaluation with arbitrated cervicography interpretations. / Schneider, Diana L.; Burke, Louis; Wright, Thomas C.; Spitzer, Mark; Chatterjee, Nilanjan; Wacholder, Sholom; Herrero, Rolando; Bratti, Maria C.; Greenberg, Mitchell D.; Hildesheim, Allan; Sherman, Mark E.; Morales, Jorge; Hutchinson, Martha L.; Alfaro, Mario; Lörincz, Attila; Schiffman, Mark.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 187, No. 1, 2002, p. 15-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schneider, DL, Burke, L, Wright, TC, Spitzer, M, Chatterjee, N, Wacholder, S, Herrero, R, Bratti, MC, Greenberg, MD, Hildesheim, A, Sherman, ME, Morales, J, Hutchinson, ML, Alfaro, M, Lörincz, A & Schiffman, M 2002, 'Can cervicography be improved? An evaluation with arbitrated cervicography interpretations', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.122848
Schneider, Diana L. ; Burke, Louis ; Wright, Thomas C. ; Spitzer, Mark ; Chatterjee, Nilanjan ; Wacholder, Sholom ; Herrero, Rolando ; Bratti, Maria C. ; Greenberg, Mitchell D. ; Hildesheim, Allan ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Morales, Jorge ; Hutchinson, Martha L. ; Alfaro, Mario ; Lörincz, Attila ; Schiffman, Mark. / Can cervicography be improved? An evaluation with arbitrated cervicography interpretations. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002 ; Vol. 187, No. 1. pp. 15-23.
@article{ee68046afe8e488398e902c555e5170d,
title = "Can cervicography be improved? An evaluation with arbitrated cervicography interpretations",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the optimal performance of cervicography. We compared an arbitrated cervigram classification with an arbitrated referent diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: From an initial group of 8460 women, a stratified sample of cervigrams from 3645 women and histologic information from 414 women underwent arbitration. Interobserver agreement was assessed for cervicography and the referent diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were estimated for initial and arbitrated cervicography results, compared with the initial and arbitrated referent diagnoses. RESULTS: For the detection of arbitrated high-grade lesions or cancer, arbitrated cervicography yielded an overall sensitivity of 63.9{\%} and a specificity of 93.7{\%}. Significantly higher sensitivity was associated with younger age and age-related visual characteristics. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the cervigram classification improved performance over a single interpretation in this population but suggested the limits of static visual screening.",
keywords = "Cervical cancer, Cervical neoplasia, Cervicography, Screening",
author = "Schneider, {Diana L.} and Louis Burke and Wright, {Thomas C.} and Mark Spitzer and Nilanjan Chatterjee and Sholom Wacholder and Rolando Herrero and Bratti, {Maria C.} and Greenberg, {Mitchell D.} and Allan Hildesheim and Sherman, {Mark E.} and Jorge Morales and Hutchinson, {Martha L.} and Mario Alfaro and Attila L{\"o}rincz and Mark Schiffman",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1067/mob.2002.122848",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "15--23",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can cervicography be improved? An evaluation with arbitrated cervicography interpretations

AU - Schneider, Diana L.

AU - Burke, Louis

AU - Wright, Thomas C.

AU - Spitzer, Mark

AU - Chatterjee, Nilanjan

AU - Wacholder, Sholom

AU - Herrero, Rolando

AU - Bratti, Maria C.

AU - Greenberg, Mitchell D.

AU - Hildesheim, Allan

AU - Sherman, Mark E.

AU - Morales, Jorge

AU - Hutchinson, Martha L.

AU - Alfaro, Mario

AU - Lörincz, Attila

AU - Schiffman, Mark

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the optimal performance of cervicography. We compared an arbitrated cervigram classification with an arbitrated referent diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: From an initial group of 8460 women, a stratified sample of cervigrams from 3645 women and histologic information from 414 women underwent arbitration. Interobserver agreement was assessed for cervicography and the referent diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were estimated for initial and arbitrated cervicography results, compared with the initial and arbitrated referent diagnoses. RESULTS: For the detection of arbitrated high-grade lesions or cancer, arbitrated cervicography yielded an overall sensitivity of 63.9% and a specificity of 93.7%. Significantly higher sensitivity was associated with younger age and age-related visual characteristics. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the cervigram classification improved performance over a single interpretation in this population but suggested the limits of static visual screening.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the optimal performance of cervicography. We compared an arbitrated cervigram classification with an arbitrated referent diagnosis of cervical neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: From an initial group of 8460 women, a stratified sample of cervigrams from 3645 women and histologic information from 414 women underwent arbitration. Interobserver agreement was assessed for cervicography and the referent diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were estimated for initial and arbitrated cervicography results, compared with the initial and arbitrated referent diagnoses. RESULTS: For the detection of arbitrated high-grade lesions or cancer, arbitrated cervicography yielded an overall sensitivity of 63.9% and a specificity of 93.7%. Significantly higher sensitivity was associated with younger age and age-related visual characteristics. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the cervigram classification improved performance over a single interpretation in this population but suggested the limits of static visual screening.

KW - Cervical cancer

KW - Cervical neoplasia

KW - Cervicography

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036071319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036071319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/mob.2002.122848

DO - 10.1067/mob.2002.122848

M3 - Article

C2 - 12114883

AN - SCOPUS:0036071319

VL - 187

SP - 15

EP - 23

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 1

ER -