Building a Medicaid Ambulatory Complex Care Program Within an Urban Medical Home

Laura D. Sander, Michael Albert, Nkem Okeke, Steven J Kravet, Katherine Rediger, Sarah Johnson Conway, Maura Mcguire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Five percent of Medicaid patients account for 50% of total costs. Preventable costs are often incurred by patients with complex medical, behavioral, and social needs who disproportionately utilize acute care services. Evidence for design, implementation, and evaluation of complex care programs in the urban Medicaid population is lacking. The article provides a description of a complex care program (CCP), challenges, and early outcomes based on a pre-post evaluation. The CCP was located within an existing urban medical home. Patients were eligible if they lived within 10 miles of the clinic and had at least 2 inpatient visits and/or 3 emergency room visits within the prior 6 months. Ambulatory Care Groups® were used to predict estimated total costs of patients, who were included if potential cost savings exceeded $5000. Patient experience and quality of care were assessed using validated measures and costs. Return on investment was calculated based on investment and cost savings. Costs include visits (clinic, specialty, and emergency room), hospital admissions, medications, tests and services, as well as salary and benefits of clinical staff. Eighty-six of 211 eligible patients (41%) were enrolled during the first 18 months of the pilot program. There were positive trends in quality metrics and patient satisfaction. The pre-post evaluation demonstrated a reduction in emergency room visits and hospitalizations (67% and 65%, respectively), which resulted in a 2.2:1 return on investment. This article offers lessons learned to colleagues considering population health approaches in the care of high-risk Medicaid patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)446-453
Number of pages8
JournalPopulation Health Management
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Patient-Centered Care
Medicaid
Ambulatory Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospital Emergency Service
Cost Savings
Urban Population
Quality of Health Care
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Patient Satisfaction
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Inpatients
Hospitalization
Health
Population

Keywords

  • complex care
  • high-need high-cost patients
  • population health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Building a Medicaid Ambulatory Complex Care Program Within an Urban Medical Home. / Sander, Laura D.; Albert, Michael; Okeke, Nkem; Kravet, Steven J; Rediger, Katherine; Johnson Conway, Sarah; Mcguire, Maura.

In: Population Health Management, Vol. 21, No. 6, 01.12.2018, p. 446-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sander, Laura D. ; Albert, Michael ; Okeke, Nkem ; Kravet, Steven J ; Rediger, Katherine ; Johnson Conway, Sarah ; Mcguire, Maura. / Building a Medicaid Ambulatory Complex Care Program Within an Urban Medical Home. In: Population Health Management. 2018 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 446-453.
@article{894ed56ec9ad43fc85dd22eefbb47aaa,
title = "Building a Medicaid Ambulatory Complex Care Program Within an Urban Medical Home",
abstract = "Five percent of Medicaid patients account for 50{\%} of total costs. Preventable costs are often incurred by patients with complex medical, behavioral, and social needs who disproportionately utilize acute care services. Evidence for design, implementation, and evaluation of complex care programs in the urban Medicaid population is lacking. The article provides a description of a complex care program (CCP), challenges, and early outcomes based on a pre-post evaluation. The CCP was located within an existing urban medical home. Patients were eligible if they lived within 10 miles of the clinic and had at least 2 inpatient visits and/or 3 emergency room visits within the prior 6 months. Ambulatory Care Groups{\circledR} were used to predict estimated total costs of patients, who were included if potential cost savings exceeded $5000. Patient experience and quality of care were assessed using validated measures and costs. Return on investment was calculated based on investment and cost savings. Costs include visits (clinic, specialty, and emergency room), hospital admissions, medications, tests and services, as well as salary and benefits of clinical staff. Eighty-six of 211 eligible patients (41{\%}) were enrolled during the first 18 months of the pilot program. There were positive trends in quality metrics and patient satisfaction. The pre-post evaluation demonstrated a reduction in emergency room visits and hospitalizations (67{\%} and 65{\%}, respectively), which resulted in a 2.2:1 return on investment. This article offers lessons learned to colleagues considering population health approaches in the care of high-risk Medicaid patients.",
keywords = "complex care, high-need high-cost patients, population health",
author = "Sander, {Laura D.} and Michael Albert and Nkem Okeke and Kravet, {Steven J} and Katherine Rediger and {Johnson Conway}, Sarah and Maura Mcguire",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/pop.2017.0200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "446--453",
journal = "Population Health Management",
issn = "1942-7891",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building a Medicaid Ambulatory Complex Care Program Within an Urban Medical Home

AU - Sander, Laura D.

AU - Albert, Michael

AU - Okeke, Nkem

AU - Kravet, Steven J

AU - Rediger, Katherine

AU - Johnson Conway, Sarah

AU - Mcguire, Maura

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Five percent of Medicaid patients account for 50% of total costs. Preventable costs are often incurred by patients with complex medical, behavioral, and social needs who disproportionately utilize acute care services. Evidence for design, implementation, and evaluation of complex care programs in the urban Medicaid population is lacking. The article provides a description of a complex care program (CCP), challenges, and early outcomes based on a pre-post evaluation. The CCP was located within an existing urban medical home. Patients were eligible if they lived within 10 miles of the clinic and had at least 2 inpatient visits and/or 3 emergency room visits within the prior 6 months. Ambulatory Care Groups® were used to predict estimated total costs of patients, who were included if potential cost savings exceeded $5000. Patient experience and quality of care were assessed using validated measures and costs. Return on investment was calculated based on investment and cost savings. Costs include visits (clinic, specialty, and emergency room), hospital admissions, medications, tests and services, as well as salary and benefits of clinical staff. Eighty-six of 211 eligible patients (41%) were enrolled during the first 18 months of the pilot program. There were positive trends in quality metrics and patient satisfaction. The pre-post evaluation demonstrated a reduction in emergency room visits and hospitalizations (67% and 65%, respectively), which resulted in a 2.2:1 return on investment. This article offers lessons learned to colleagues considering population health approaches in the care of high-risk Medicaid patients.

AB - Five percent of Medicaid patients account for 50% of total costs. Preventable costs are often incurred by patients with complex medical, behavioral, and social needs who disproportionately utilize acute care services. Evidence for design, implementation, and evaluation of complex care programs in the urban Medicaid population is lacking. The article provides a description of a complex care program (CCP), challenges, and early outcomes based on a pre-post evaluation. The CCP was located within an existing urban medical home. Patients were eligible if they lived within 10 miles of the clinic and had at least 2 inpatient visits and/or 3 emergency room visits within the prior 6 months. Ambulatory Care Groups® were used to predict estimated total costs of patients, who were included if potential cost savings exceeded $5000. Patient experience and quality of care were assessed using validated measures and costs. Return on investment was calculated based on investment and cost savings. Costs include visits (clinic, specialty, and emergency room), hospital admissions, medications, tests and services, as well as salary and benefits of clinical staff. Eighty-six of 211 eligible patients (41%) were enrolled during the first 18 months of the pilot program. There were positive trends in quality metrics and patient satisfaction. The pre-post evaluation demonstrated a reduction in emergency room visits and hospitalizations (67% and 65%, respectively), which resulted in a 2.2:1 return on investment. This article offers lessons learned to colleagues considering population health approaches in the care of high-risk Medicaid patients.

KW - complex care

KW - high-need high-cost patients

KW - population health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054284305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054284305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/pop.2017.0200

DO - 10.1089/pop.2017.0200

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 446

EP - 453

JO - Population Health Management

JF - Population Health Management

SN - 1942-7891

IS - 6

ER -