TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief Report
T2 - Do Patients With Poor Outcomes Regret Having Had Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery?
AU - Schwarze, Margaret L.
AU - Sayla, Maliha A.
AU - Alexander, G. Caleb
N1 - Funding Information:
GCA was supported by the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics and a Geriatric Academic Program Award from the National Institutes of Aging to the University of Chicago (K12AG00488).
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Background: Retrospection and hindsight bias may lead patients with bad outcomes to regret the choice of infrainguinal bypass surgery. Objective: To assess patients' retrospective evaluations of surgery stratified by common criteria to judge surgical success. Survey Design: Cross-sectional phone surveys of 33 patients, an average of 162 d following infrainguinal bypass surgery. Results: Of the 33 patients evaluated, 26 (79%) experienced undesirable outcomes, including amputation (4, 12%), prolonged hospitalization (8, 24%), wound infection (8, 24%), readmission to the hospital (12, 36%), additional surgery (11, 33%), and other complications (16, 48%). Of the patients surveyed, nearly all (30, 91%) reported that they would still want to have had the surgery if they had a 5-y 50% mortality, and the same proportion reported they would recommend the surgery to someone else with similar medical problems (30, 91%). Conclusions: If confirmed in larger populations, these findings suggest that when viewed retrospectively, results traditionally considered poor outcomes may not deter many patients' preferences for surgical management of their infrainguinal vascular disease.
AB - Background: Retrospection and hindsight bias may lead patients with bad outcomes to regret the choice of infrainguinal bypass surgery. Objective: To assess patients' retrospective evaluations of surgery stratified by common criteria to judge surgical success. Survey Design: Cross-sectional phone surveys of 33 patients, an average of 162 d following infrainguinal bypass surgery. Results: Of the 33 patients evaluated, 26 (79%) experienced undesirable outcomes, including amputation (4, 12%), prolonged hospitalization (8, 24%), wound infection (8, 24%), readmission to the hospital (12, 36%), additional surgery (11, 33%), and other complications (16, 48%). Of the patients surveyed, nearly all (30, 91%) reported that they would still want to have had the surgery if they had a 5-y 50% mortality, and the same proportion reported they would recommend the surgery to someone else with similar medical problems (30, 91%). Conclusions: If confirmed in larger populations, these findings suggest that when viewed retrospectively, results traditionally considered poor outcomes may not deter many patients' preferences for surgical management of their infrainguinal vascular disease.
KW - hindsight bias
KW - infrainguinal bypass
KW - limb salvage
KW - surgical ethics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57149095248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57149095248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.05.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2007.05.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 17644108
AN - SCOPUS:57149095248
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 151
SP - 6
EP - 9
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 1
ER -