Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: Revisiting Kraepelin

Roman Kotov, Shirley H. Leong, Ramin Mojtabai, Ann C Eckardt Erlanger, Laura J. Fochtmann, Eduardo Constantino, Gabrielle A. Carlson, Evelyn J. Bromet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Established nosology identifies schizoaffective disorder as a distinct category with boundaries separating it from mood disorders with psychosis and from schizophrenia. Alternative models argue for a single boundary distinguishing mood disorders with psychosis from schizophrenia (kraepelinian dichotomy) or a continuous spectrum from affective to nonaffective psychosis. OBJECTIVE: To identify natural boundaries within psychotic disorders by evaluating associations between symptom course and long-term outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Suffolk County Mental Health Project cohort consists of first-admission patients with psychosis recruited from all inpatient units of Suffolk County, New York (72%response rate). In an inception cohort design, participants were monitored closely for 4 years after admission, and their symptom course was charted for 526 individuals; 10-year outcome was obtained for 413. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and other consensus ratings of study psychiatrists. RESULTS: We used nonlinear modeling (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing and spline regression) to examine links between 4-year symptom variables (ratio of nonaffective psychosis to mood disturbance, duration of mania/hypomania, depression, and psychosis) and 10-year outcomes. Nonaffective psychosis ratio exhibited a sharp discontinuity-10 days or more of psychosis outside mood episodes predicted an 11-point decrement in GAF-consistent with the kraepelinian dichotomy. Duration of mania/hypomania showed 2 discontinuities demarcating 3 groups: mania absent, episodic mania, and chronic mania (manic/hypomanic >1 year). The episodic group had a better outcome compared with the mania absent and chronic mania groups (12-point and 8-point difference on GAF). Duration of depression and psychosis had linear associations with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data support the kraepelinian dichotomy, although the study requires replication. A boundary between schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia was not observed, which casts further doubt on schizoaffective diagnosis. Co-occurring schizophrenia and mood disorder may be better coded as separate diagnoses, an approach that could simplify diagnosis, improve its reliability, and align it with the natural taxonomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1276-1286
Number of pages11
JournalJAMA Psychiatry
Volume70
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Psychotic Disorders
Bipolar Disorder
Schizophrenia
Mood Disorders
Depression
Patient Admission
Psychiatry
Inpatients
Consensus
Mental Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Kotov, R., Leong, S. H., Mojtabai, R., Erlanger, A. C. E., Fochtmann, L. J., Constantino, E., ... Bromet, E. J. (2013). Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: Revisiting Kraepelin. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(12), 1276-1286. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350

Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder : Revisiting Kraepelin. / Kotov, Roman; Leong, Shirley H.; Mojtabai, Ramin; Erlanger, Ann C Eckardt; Fochtmann, Laura J.; Constantino, Eduardo; Carlson, Gabrielle A.; Bromet, Evelyn J.

In: JAMA Psychiatry, Vol. 70, No. 12, 2013, p. 1276-1286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kotov, R, Leong, SH, Mojtabai, R, Erlanger, ACE, Fochtmann, LJ, Constantino, E, Carlson, GA & Bromet, EJ 2013, 'Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: Revisiting Kraepelin', JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1276-1286. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350
Kotov R, Leong SH, Mojtabai R, Erlanger ACE, Fochtmann LJ, Constantino E et al. Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: Revisiting Kraepelin. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1276-1286. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350
Kotov, Roman ; Leong, Shirley H. ; Mojtabai, Ramin ; Erlanger, Ann C Eckardt ; Fochtmann, Laura J. ; Constantino, Eduardo ; Carlson, Gabrielle A. ; Bromet, Evelyn J. / Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder : Revisiting Kraepelin. In: JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 ; Vol. 70, No. 12. pp. 1276-1286.
@article{789eb303f5834b88b271fa3f31fdb2d4,
title = "Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder: Revisiting Kraepelin",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE: Established nosology identifies schizoaffective disorder as a distinct category with boundaries separating it from mood disorders with psychosis and from schizophrenia. Alternative models argue for a single boundary distinguishing mood disorders with psychosis from schizophrenia (kraepelinian dichotomy) or a continuous spectrum from affective to nonaffective psychosis. OBJECTIVE: To identify natural boundaries within psychotic disorders by evaluating associations between symptom course and long-term outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Suffolk County Mental Health Project cohort consists of first-admission patients with psychosis recruited from all inpatient units of Suffolk County, New York (72{\%}response rate). In an inception cohort design, participants were monitored closely for 4 years after admission, and their symptom course was charted for 526 individuals; 10-year outcome was obtained for 413. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and other consensus ratings of study psychiatrists. RESULTS: We used nonlinear modeling (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing and spline regression) to examine links between 4-year symptom variables (ratio of nonaffective psychosis to mood disturbance, duration of mania/hypomania, depression, and psychosis) and 10-year outcomes. Nonaffective psychosis ratio exhibited a sharp discontinuity-10 days or more of psychosis outside mood episodes predicted an 11-point decrement in GAF-consistent with the kraepelinian dichotomy. Duration of mania/hypomania showed 2 discontinuities demarcating 3 groups: mania absent, episodic mania, and chronic mania (manic/hypomanic >1 year). The episodic group had a better outcome compared with the mania absent and chronic mania groups (12-point and 8-point difference on GAF). Duration of depression and psychosis had linear associations with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data support the kraepelinian dichotomy, although the study requires replication. A boundary between schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia was not observed, which casts further doubt on schizoaffective diagnosis. Co-occurring schizophrenia and mood disorder may be better coded as separate diagnoses, an approach that could simplify diagnosis, improve its reliability, and align it with the natural taxonomy.",
author = "Roman Kotov and Leong, {Shirley H.} and Ramin Mojtabai and Erlanger, {Ann C Eckardt} and Fochtmann, {Laura J.} and Eduardo Constantino and Carlson, {Gabrielle A.} and Bromet, {Evelyn J.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "1276--1286",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Boundaries of schizoaffective disorder

T2 - Revisiting Kraepelin

AU - Kotov, Roman

AU - Leong, Shirley H.

AU - Mojtabai, Ramin

AU - Erlanger, Ann C Eckardt

AU - Fochtmann, Laura J.

AU - Constantino, Eduardo

AU - Carlson, Gabrielle A.

AU - Bromet, Evelyn J.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - IMPORTANCE: Established nosology identifies schizoaffective disorder as a distinct category with boundaries separating it from mood disorders with psychosis and from schizophrenia. Alternative models argue for a single boundary distinguishing mood disorders with psychosis from schizophrenia (kraepelinian dichotomy) or a continuous spectrum from affective to nonaffective psychosis. OBJECTIVE: To identify natural boundaries within psychotic disorders by evaluating associations between symptom course and long-term outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Suffolk County Mental Health Project cohort consists of first-admission patients with psychosis recruited from all inpatient units of Suffolk County, New York (72%response rate). In an inception cohort design, participants were monitored closely for 4 years after admission, and their symptom course was charted for 526 individuals; 10-year outcome was obtained for 413. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and other consensus ratings of study psychiatrists. RESULTS: We used nonlinear modeling (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing and spline regression) to examine links between 4-year symptom variables (ratio of nonaffective psychosis to mood disturbance, duration of mania/hypomania, depression, and psychosis) and 10-year outcomes. Nonaffective psychosis ratio exhibited a sharp discontinuity-10 days or more of psychosis outside mood episodes predicted an 11-point decrement in GAF-consistent with the kraepelinian dichotomy. Duration of mania/hypomania showed 2 discontinuities demarcating 3 groups: mania absent, episodic mania, and chronic mania (manic/hypomanic >1 year). The episodic group had a better outcome compared with the mania absent and chronic mania groups (12-point and 8-point difference on GAF). Duration of depression and psychosis had linear associations with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data support the kraepelinian dichotomy, although the study requires replication. A boundary between schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia was not observed, which casts further doubt on schizoaffective diagnosis. Co-occurring schizophrenia and mood disorder may be better coded as separate diagnoses, an approach that could simplify diagnosis, improve its reliability, and align it with the natural taxonomy.

AB - IMPORTANCE: Established nosology identifies schizoaffective disorder as a distinct category with boundaries separating it from mood disorders with psychosis and from schizophrenia. Alternative models argue for a single boundary distinguishing mood disorders with psychosis from schizophrenia (kraepelinian dichotomy) or a continuous spectrum from affective to nonaffective psychosis. OBJECTIVE: To identify natural boundaries within psychotic disorders by evaluating associations between symptom course and long-term outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Suffolk County Mental Health Project cohort consists of first-admission patients with psychosis recruited from all inpatient units of Suffolk County, New York (72%response rate). In an inception cohort design, participants were monitored closely for 4 years after admission, and their symptom course was charted for 526 individuals; 10-year outcome was obtained for 413. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and other consensus ratings of study psychiatrists. RESULTS: We used nonlinear modeling (locally weighted scatterplot smoothing and spline regression) to examine links between 4-year symptom variables (ratio of nonaffective psychosis to mood disturbance, duration of mania/hypomania, depression, and psychosis) and 10-year outcomes. Nonaffective psychosis ratio exhibited a sharp discontinuity-10 days or more of psychosis outside mood episodes predicted an 11-point decrement in GAF-consistent with the kraepelinian dichotomy. Duration of mania/hypomania showed 2 discontinuities demarcating 3 groups: mania absent, episodic mania, and chronic mania (manic/hypomanic >1 year). The episodic group had a better outcome compared with the mania absent and chronic mania groups (12-point and 8-point difference on GAF). Duration of depression and psychosis had linear associations with worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our data support the kraepelinian dichotomy, although the study requires replication. A boundary between schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia was not observed, which casts further doubt on schizoaffective diagnosis. Co-occurring schizophrenia and mood disorder may be better coded as separate diagnoses, an approach that could simplify diagnosis, improve its reliability, and align it with the natural taxonomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890100453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890100453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350

DO - 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2350

M3 - Article

C2 - 24089086

AN - SCOPUS:84890100453

VL - 70

SP - 1276

EP - 1286

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 12

ER -