Body mass prediction from stature and bi-iliac breadth in two high latitude populations, with application to earlier higher latitude humans

Christopher B Ruff, Markku Niskanen, Juho Anti Junno, Paul Jamison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that body mass can be estimated from stature and bi-iliac (maximum pelvic) breadth with reasonable accuracy in modern humans, supporting the use of this method to estimate body mass in earlier human skeletal samples. However, to date the method has not been tested specifically on high latitude individuals, whose body form in some ways more closely approximates that of earlier higher latitude humans (i.e., large and broad-bodied). In this study, anthropometric data for 67 Alaskan Inupiat and 54 Finnish adults were used to test the stature/bi-iliac body mass estimation method. Both samples are very broad-bodied, and the Finnish sample is very tall as well. The method generally works well in these individuals, with average directional biases in body mass estimates of 3% or less, except in male Finns, whose body masses are systematically underestimated by an average of almost 9%. A majority of individuals in the total pooled sample have estimates to within ±10% of their true body masses, and more than three-quarters have estimates to within ±15%. The major factor found to affect directional bias is shoulder to hip breadth (biacromial/ bi-iliac breadth). Male Finns have particularly wide shoulders, which may in part explain their systematic underestimation. New body mass estimation equations are developed that include the new data from this study. When applied to a sample of earlier (late middle Pleistocene to early Upper Paleolithic) higher latitude skeletal specimens, differences between previous and new body estimates are small (less than 2%). However, because the Finns significantly extend the range of morphological variation beyond that represented in the original world-wide reference sample used in developing the method, thereby increasing its generality, it is recommended that these new formulas be used in subsequent body mass estimations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-392
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Human Evolution
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

body mass
prediction
Fin
shoulders
sampling
methodology
reference sample
Paleolithic
estimation method
hips
trend
Pleistocene
method

Keywords

  • Body mass
  • High latitude
  • Skeletal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Body mass prediction from stature and bi-iliac breadth in two high latitude populations, with application to earlier higher latitude humans. / Ruff, Christopher B; Niskanen, Markku; Junno, Juho Anti; Jamison, Paul.

In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 48, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 381-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{574b13b0f6d543d28d48d14f8500ab58,
title = "Body mass prediction from stature and bi-iliac breadth in two high latitude populations, with application to earlier higher latitude humans",
abstract = "Previous studies have indicated that body mass can be estimated from stature and bi-iliac (maximum pelvic) breadth with reasonable accuracy in modern humans, supporting the use of this method to estimate body mass in earlier human skeletal samples. However, to date the method has not been tested specifically on high latitude individuals, whose body form in some ways more closely approximates that of earlier higher latitude humans (i.e., large and broad-bodied). In this study, anthropometric data for 67 Alaskan Inupiat and 54 Finnish adults were used to test the stature/bi-iliac body mass estimation method. Both samples are very broad-bodied, and the Finnish sample is very tall as well. The method generally works well in these individuals, with average directional biases in body mass estimates of 3{\%} or less, except in male Finns, whose body masses are systematically underestimated by an average of almost 9{\%}. A majority of individuals in the total pooled sample have estimates to within ±10{\%} of their true body masses, and more than three-quarters have estimates to within ±15{\%}. The major factor found to affect directional bias is shoulder to hip breadth (biacromial/ bi-iliac breadth). Male Finns have particularly wide shoulders, which may in part explain their systematic underestimation. New body mass estimation equations are developed that include the new data from this study. When applied to a sample of earlier (late middle Pleistocene to early Upper Paleolithic) higher latitude skeletal specimens, differences between previous and new body estimates are small (less than 2{\%}). However, because the Finns significantly extend the range of morphological variation beyond that represented in the original world-wide reference sample used in developing the method, thereby increasing its generality, it is recommended that these new formulas be used in subsequent body mass estimations.",
keywords = "Body mass, High latitude, Skeletal",
author = "Ruff, {Christopher B} and Markku Niskanen and Junno, {Juho Anti} and Paul Jamison",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "381--392",
journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
issn = "0047-2484",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Body mass prediction from stature and bi-iliac breadth in two high latitude populations, with application to earlier higher latitude humans

AU - Ruff, Christopher B

AU - Niskanen, Markku

AU - Junno, Juho Anti

AU - Jamison, Paul

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Previous studies have indicated that body mass can be estimated from stature and bi-iliac (maximum pelvic) breadth with reasonable accuracy in modern humans, supporting the use of this method to estimate body mass in earlier human skeletal samples. However, to date the method has not been tested specifically on high latitude individuals, whose body form in some ways more closely approximates that of earlier higher latitude humans (i.e., large and broad-bodied). In this study, anthropometric data for 67 Alaskan Inupiat and 54 Finnish adults were used to test the stature/bi-iliac body mass estimation method. Both samples are very broad-bodied, and the Finnish sample is very tall as well. The method generally works well in these individuals, with average directional biases in body mass estimates of 3% or less, except in male Finns, whose body masses are systematically underestimated by an average of almost 9%. A majority of individuals in the total pooled sample have estimates to within ±10% of their true body masses, and more than three-quarters have estimates to within ±15%. The major factor found to affect directional bias is shoulder to hip breadth (biacromial/ bi-iliac breadth). Male Finns have particularly wide shoulders, which may in part explain their systematic underestimation. New body mass estimation equations are developed that include the new data from this study. When applied to a sample of earlier (late middle Pleistocene to early Upper Paleolithic) higher latitude skeletal specimens, differences between previous and new body estimates are small (less than 2%). However, because the Finns significantly extend the range of morphological variation beyond that represented in the original world-wide reference sample used in developing the method, thereby increasing its generality, it is recommended that these new formulas be used in subsequent body mass estimations.

AB - Previous studies have indicated that body mass can be estimated from stature and bi-iliac (maximum pelvic) breadth with reasonable accuracy in modern humans, supporting the use of this method to estimate body mass in earlier human skeletal samples. However, to date the method has not been tested specifically on high latitude individuals, whose body form in some ways more closely approximates that of earlier higher latitude humans (i.e., large and broad-bodied). In this study, anthropometric data for 67 Alaskan Inupiat and 54 Finnish adults were used to test the stature/bi-iliac body mass estimation method. Both samples are very broad-bodied, and the Finnish sample is very tall as well. The method generally works well in these individuals, with average directional biases in body mass estimates of 3% or less, except in male Finns, whose body masses are systematically underestimated by an average of almost 9%. A majority of individuals in the total pooled sample have estimates to within ±10% of their true body masses, and more than three-quarters have estimates to within ±15%. The major factor found to affect directional bias is shoulder to hip breadth (biacromial/ bi-iliac breadth). Male Finns have particularly wide shoulders, which may in part explain their systematic underestimation. New body mass estimation equations are developed that include the new data from this study. When applied to a sample of earlier (late middle Pleistocene to early Upper Paleolithic) higher latitude skeletal specimens, differences between previous and new body estimates are small (less than 2%). However, because the Finns significantly extend the range of morphological variation beyond that represented in the original world-wide reference sample used in developing the method, thereby increasing its generality, it is recommended that these new formulas be used in subsequent body mass estimations.

KW - Body mass

KW - High latitude

KW - Skeletal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15444365518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15444365518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 15788184

AN - SCOPUS:15444365518

VL - 48

SP - 381

EP - 392

JO - Journal of Human Evolution

JF - Journal of Human Evolution

SN - 0047-2484

IS - 4

ER -