TY - JOUR
T1 - Biophysics of radiofrequency ablation using an irrigated electrode
AU - Demazumder, Deeptankar
AU - Mirotznik, Mark S.
AU - Schwartzman, David
N1 - Funding Information:
Data presented in part at the 18th annual scientific sessions of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, New Orleans, LA, 1997 Supported in part by a grant from Biosense Webster, Inc., Diamond Bar, CA Address for correspondence: David Schwartzman, MD, Atrial Arrhythmia Center, University of Pittsburgh Presbyterian Hospital B535, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582. E-mail: schwartzmand@msx.upmc.edu
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Background: Previous reports have proposed that prevention of electrode-endocardial interfacial boiling is the key mechanism by which radiofrequency application using an irrigated electrode yields a larger ablation lesion than a non-irrigated electrode. It has been suggested that maximal myocardial temperature is shifted deep into myocardium during irrigated ablation. Purpose: To examine the biophysics of irrigated ablation by correlating electrode and myocardial temperatures with ablation circuit impedance and lesion morphology, and to perform a comparison with non-irrigated ablation modes. To assess the influence of irrigant rate, composition, temperature and blood flow velocity. Methods: I. Ablation with and without electrode irrigation was performed in vitro utilizing a whole blood-superfused system. Electrode, electrode-endocardial interface, and intramyocardial temperatures were assessed, as were ablation circuit impedance, total delivered energy, and lesion and electrode morphology. Irrigants assessed were room temperature normal saline, iced normal saline, and dextrose. Irrigant flow rates assessed were 20 and 100 cc/min. Blood flow velocities assessed were 0 and 0.26 m/s. II. Finite element simulations of myocardial temperature during irrigated ablation were performed to further elucidate irrigation biophysics and provide a more detailed myocardial temperature profile. Two models were constructed, each utilizing a different core assumption regarding the electrode-tissue boundary: 1. electrode temperature measured in vitro; 2. interfacial temperature measured in vitro. Intramyocardial temperatures predicted by each model were correlated with corresponding temperatures measured in vitro. Results: I. Ablation during electrode irrigation with normal saline was associated with greater ablation energy deposition and larger lesion dimensions than non-irrigated ablation. The mechanism underlying the larger lesion was delay or inhibition of impedance rise; this was associated with attenuation or prevention of electrode coagulum. Irrigation did not prevent interfacial boiling, which occurred during uninterrupted radio-frequency energy deposition and lesion growth. Irrigation using saline at 100cc/min was associated with no impedance rise regardless of blood flow velocity, whereas during irrigation at 20cc/min impedance rise was blood flow rate-dependent. Iced saline produced results equivalent to room temperature saline. Irrigation with dextrose was associated with curtailed energy application and relatively small lesions. II. The finite element simulation that used electrode-endocardial interfacial temperature as the core assumption predicted a myocardial temperature profile which correlated significantly better with in vitro than did the simulation which used electrode temperature as the core assumption. Regardless of irrigant and blood flow rates, maximal myocardial temperature was always within 1 mm of the endocardial surface. Conclusions: Radiofrequency energy application via a saline irrigated electrode resulted in a larger lesion due to attenuation or eradication of electrode coagulum, thus preventing an impedance rise. Irrigation did not prevent interfacial boiling, but boiling did not prevent lesion growth. The site of maximal myocardial temperature during irrigated ablation was relatively superficial, always within 1mm of the endocardial surface. Irrigation with iced saline was no more effective than with room temperature saline; both were far more effective than dextrose. Higher irrigation rates immunized the electrode from the influence of blood flow. The biophysical effects of blood flow and irrigation were similar.
AB - Background: Previous reports have proposed that prevention of electrode-endocardial interfacial boiling is the key mechanism by which radiofrequency application using an irrigated electrode yields a larger ablation lesion than a non-irrigated electrode. It has been suggested that maximal myocardial temperature is shifted deep into myocardium during irrigated ablation. Purpose: To examine the biophysics of irrigated ablation by correlating electrode and myocardial temperatures with ablation circuit impedance and lesion morphology, and to perform a comparison with non-irrigated ablation modes. To assess the influence of irrigant rate, composition, temperature and blood flow velocity. Methods: I. Ablation with and without electrode irrigation was performed in vitro utilizing a whole blood-superfused system. Electrode, electrode-endocardial interface, and intramyocardial temperatures were assessed, as were ablation circuit impedance, total delivered energy, and lesion and electrode morphology. Irrigants assessed were room temperature normal saline, iced normal saline, and dextrose. Irrigant flow rates assessed were 20 and 100 cc/min. Blood flow velocities assessed were 0 and 0.26 m/s. II. Finite element simulations of myocardial temperature during irrigated ablation were performed to further elucidate irrigation biophysics and provide a more detailed myocardial temperature profile. Two models were constructed, each utilizing a different core assumption regarding the electrode-tissue boundary: 1. electrode temperature measured in vitro; 2. interfacial temperature measured in vitro. Intramyocardial temperatures predicted by each model were correlated with corresponding temperatures measured in vitro. Results: I. Ablation during electrode irrigation with normal saline was associated with greater ablation energy deposition and larger lesion dimensions than non-irrigated ablation. The mechanism underlying the larger lesion was delay or inhibition of impedance rise; this was associated with attenuation or prevention of electrode coagulum. Irrigation did not prevent interfacial boiling, which occurred during uninterrupted radio-frequency energy deposition and lesion growth. Irrigation using saline at 100cc/min was associated with no impedance rise regardless of blood flow velocity, whereas during irrigation at 20cc/min impedance rise was blood flow rate-dependent. Iced saline produced results equivalent to room temperature saline. Irrigation with dextrose was associated with curtailed energy application and relatively small lesions. II. The finite element simulation that used electrode-endocardial interfacial temperature as the core assumption predicted a myocardial temperature profile which correlated significantly better with in vitro than did the simulation which used electrode temperature as the core assumption. Regardless of irrigant and blood flow rates, maximal myocardial temperature was always within 1 mm of the endocardial surface. Conclusions: Radiofrequency energy application via a saline irrigated electrode resulted in a larger lesion due to attenuation or eradication of electrode coagulum, thus preventing an impedance rise. Irrigation did not prevent interfacial boiling, but boiling did not prevent lesion growth. The site of maximal myocardial temperature during irrigated ablation was relatively superficial, always within 1mm of the endocardial surface. Irrigation with iced saline was no more effective than with room temperature saline; both were far more effective than dextrose. Higher irrigation rates immunized the electrode from the influence of blood flow. The biophysical effects of blood flow and irrigation were similar.
KW - Catheter ablation
KW - Radio frequency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035214448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035214448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1013224110550
DO - 10.1023/A:1013224110550
M3 - Article
C2 - 11752906
AN - SCOPUS:0035214448
VL - 5
SP - 377
EP - 389
JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
SN - 1383-875X
IS - 4
ER -