Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures

Antoine G. Tohmeh, John M. Mathis, David C. Fenton, Alan M. Levine, Stephen M Belkoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design. Cadaveric study on the biomechanics of osteoporotic vertebral bodies augmented and not augmented with polymethylmethacrylate cement. Objectives. To determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies subjected to compression fractures and 1) not augmented, 2) augmented with unipedicular injection of cement, or 3) augmented with bipedicular injection of cement. Summary of Background Data. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a relatively new method of managing osteoporotic compression fractures, but it lacks biomechanical confirmation. Methods. Fresh vertebral bodies (L2-L5) were harvested from 10 osteoporotic spines (T scores range, -3.7 to -8.8) and compressed in a materials testing machine to determine intact strength and stiffness. They were then repaired using a transpedicular injection of cement (unipedicular or bipedicular), or they were unaugmented and recrushed. Results. Results suggest that unipedicular and bipedicular cement injection restored vertebral body stiffness to intact values, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly more compliant than either injected or intact vertebral bodies. Vertebral bodies injected with cement (both bipedicular and unipedicular) were significantly stronger than the intact vertebral bodies, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly weaker. There was no significant difference in loss in vertebral body height between any of the augmentation groups. Conclusions. This study suggests that unipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty, increases acute strength and restores stiffness of vertebral bodies with compression fractures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1772-1776
Number of pages5
JournalSpine
Volume24
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vertebroplasty
Compression Fractures
Osteoporotic Fractures
Injections
Materials Testing
Body Height
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Biomechanical Phenomena
Spine

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Osteoporosis
  • Percutaneous vertebroplasty
  • Polymethylmethacrylate
  • Spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. / Tohmeh, Antoine G.; Mathis, John M.; Fenton, David C.; Levine, Alan M.; Belkoff, Stephen M.

In: Spine, Vol. 24, No. 17, 01.09.1999, p. 1772-1776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tohmeh, Antoine G. ; Mathis, John M. ; Fenton, David C. ; Levine, Alan M. ; Belkoff, Stephen M. / Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. In: Spine. 1999 ; Vol. 24, No. 17. pp. 1772-1776.
@article{dcce0284f74148e2867a355e5ccb16f6,
title = "Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures",
abstract = "Study Design. Cadaveric study on the biomechanics of osteoporotic vertebral bodies augmented and not augmented with polymethylmethacrylate cement. Objectives. To determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies subjected to compression fractures and 1) not augmented, 2) augmented with unipedicular injection of cement, or 3) augmented with bipedicular injection of cement. Summary of Background Data. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a relatively new method of managing osteoporotic compression fractures, but it lacks biomechanical confirmation. Methods. Fresh vertebral bodies (L2-L5) were harvested from 10 osteoporotic spines (T scores range, -3.7 to -8.8) and compressed in a materials testing machine to determine intact strength and stiffness. They were then repaired using a transpedicular injection of cement (unipedicular or bipedicular), or they were unaugmented and recrushed. Results. Results suggest that unipedicular and bipedicular cement injection restored vertebral body stiffness to intact values, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly more compliant than either injected or intact vertebral bodies. Vertebral bodies injected with cement (both bipedicular and unipedicular) were significantly stronger than the intact vertebral bodies, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly weaker. There was no significant difference in loss in vertebral body height between any of the augmentation groups. Conclusions. This study suggests that unipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty, increases acute strength and restores stiffness of vertebral bodies with compression fractures.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Osteoporosis, Percutaneous vertebroplasty, Polymethylmethacrylate, Spine",
author = "Tohmeh, {Antoine G.} and Mathis, {John M.} and Fenton, {David C.} and Levine, {Alan M.} and Belkoff, {Stephen M}",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1772--1776",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures

AU - Tohmeh, Antoine G.

AU - Mathis, John M.

AU - Fenton, David C.

AU - Levine, Alan M.

AU - Belkoff, Stephen M

PY - 1999/9/1

Y1 - 1999/9/1

N2 - Study Design. Cadaveric study on the biomechanics of osteoporotic vertebral bodies augmented and not augmented with polymethylmethacrylate cement. Objectives. To determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies subjected to compression fractures and 1) not augmented, 2) augmented with unipedicular injection of cement, or 3) augmented with bipedicular injection of cement. Summary of Background Data. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a relatively new method of managing osteoporotic compression fractures, but it lacks biomechanical confirmation. Methods. Fresh vertebral bodies (L2-L5) were harvested from 10 osteoporotic spines (T scores range, -3.7 to -8.8) and compressed in a materials testing machine to determine intact strength and stiffness. They were then repaired using a transpedicular injection of cement (unipedicular or bipedicular), or they were unaugmented and recrushed. Results. Results suggest that unipedicular and bipedicular cement injection restored vertebral body stiffness to intact values, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly more compliant than either injected or intact vertebral bodies. Vertebral bodies injected with cement (both bipedicular and unipedicular) were significantly stronger than the intact vertebral bodies, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly weaker. There was no significant difference in loss in vertebral body height between any of the augmentation groups. Conclusions. This study suggests that unipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty, increases acute strength and restores stiffness of vertebral bodies with compression fractures.

AB - Study Design. Cadaveric study on the biomechanics of osteoporotic vertebral bodies augmented and not augmented with polymethylmethacrylate cement. Objectives. To determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies subjected to compression fractures and 1) not augmented, 2) augmented with unipedicular injection of cement, or 3) augmented with bipedicular injection of cement. Summary of Background Data. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is a relatively new method of managing osteoporotic compression fractures, but it lacks biomechanical confirmation. Methods. Fresh vertebral bodies (L2-L5) were harvested from 10 osteoporotic spines (T scores range, -3.7 to -8.8) and compressed in a materials testing machine to determine intact strength and stiffness. They were then repaired using a transpedicular injection of cement (unipedicular or bipedicular), or they were unaugmented and recrushed. Results. Results suggest that unipedicular and bipedicular cement injection restored vertebral body stiffness to intact values, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly more compliant than either injected or intact vertebral bodies. Vertebral bodies injected with cement (both bipedicular and unipedicular) were significantly stronger than the intact vertebral bodies, whereas unaugmented vertebral bodies were significantly weaker. There was no significant difference in loss in vertebral body height between any of the augmentation groups. Conclusions. This study suggests that unipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty, increases acute strength and restores stiffness of vertebral bodies with compression fractures.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Osteoporosis

KW - Percutaneous vertebroplasty

KW - Polymethylmethacrylate

KW - Spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033200346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033200346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004

M3 - Article

C2 - 10488505

AN - SCOPUS:0033200346

VL - 24

SP - 1772

EP - 1776

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 17

ER -