Biomechanical analysis of tibial strength after harvest of unicortical tibial grafts from two different sites

Yuhwan Hong, Brent G. Parks, Stuart Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Use of tibial strut grafts has several potential advantages over other donor sites and would be ideal as a harvest site for bone grafts if there are minimal or no resulting risks to tibial stability. Methods: Ten matched-pair cadaver tibiae were randomized to have a 1.5 × 4.0 cm cortical graft harvested from the tibial crest or 1 cm posterior to the tibial crest Both locations were 6 cm distal to the tibial plateau. The grafts were removed using a high-speed oscillating saw, and each end of the tibia was mounted for testing and loaded onto a servohydraulic test frame. The samples were anally loaded with 720 N (162 lbs) of force, and an external rotational torque was applied at 5 degrees per second to failure. Failure torque for each tibia was recorded. A paired Student's t-test was used to determine whether any observed differences in failure torques were significant Results: The torque to failure range for oncrest grafts was 11.65 to 81.76 Nm (average, 44.53 Nm; SD, 22.82 Nm). The torque to failure range for the tibiae with the graft 1 cm off-crest was 13.30 to 70.45 Nm (average, 41.64 Nm; SD, 17.83 Nm). All fractures were spiral, included the distalmost anterior corner of the donor site, and extended distally. There was no significant difference in torque to failure between the two donor sites (p = 0.22). The grafts varied consistently in quality. Conclusion: Considering that there was no statistically significant difference in torque to failure between the two groups of tibiae, the site for tibial bone graft can be selected based on the shape of the cortical graft necessary for each specific surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-195
Number of pages6
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Torque
Transplants
Tibia
Tissue Donors
Bone and Bones
Bone Fractures
Cadaver
Students

Keywords

  • Biomechanical
  • Cadaver
  • Graft
  • Tibia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Biomechanical analysis of tibial strength after harvest of unicortical tibial grafts from two different sites. / Hong, Yuhwan; Parks, Brent G.; Miller, Stuart.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.2006, p. 190-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{df7e9ef1319f4b0e93f852c7e4f92cc1,
title = "Biomechanical analysis of tibial strength after harvest of unicortical tibial grafts from two different sites",
abstract = "Background: Use of tibial strut grafts has several potential advantages over other donor sites and would be ideal as a harvest site for bone grafts if there are minimal or no resulting risks to tibial stability. Methods: Ten matched-pair cadaver tibiae were randomized to have a 1.5 × 4.0 cm cortical graft harvested from the tibial crest or 1 cm posterior to the tibial crest Both locations were 6 cm distal to the tibial plateau. The grafts were removed using a high-speed oscillating saw, and each end of the tibia was mounted for testing and loaded onto a servohydraulic test frame. The samples were anally loaded with 720 N (162 lbs) of force, and an external rotational torque was applied at 5 degrees per second to failure. Failure torque for each tibia was recorded. A paired Student's t-test was used to determine whether any observed differences in failure torques were significant Results: The torque to failure range for oncrest grafts was 11.65 to 81.76 Nm (average, 44.53 Nm; SD, 22.82 Nm). The torque to failure range for the tibiae with the graft 1 cm off-crest was 13.30 to 70.45 Nm (average, 41.64 Nm; SD, 17.83 Nm). All fractures were spiral, included the distalmost anterior corner of the donor site, and extended distally. There was no significant difference in torque to failure between the two donor sites (p = 0.22). The grafts varied consistently in quality. Conclusion: Considering that there was no statistically significant difference in torque to failure between the two groups of tibiae, the site for tibial bone graft can be selected based on the shape of the cortical graft necessary for each specific surgery.",
keywords = "Biomechanical, Cadaver, Graft, Tibia",
author = "Yuhwan Hong and Parks, {Brent G.} and Stuart Miller",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/107110070602700307",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "190--195",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical analysis of tibial strength after harvest of unicortical tibial grafts from two different sites

AU - Hong, Yuhwan

AU - Parks, Brent G.

AU - Miller, Stuart

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Background: Use of tibial strut grafts has several potential advantages over other donor sites and would be ideal as a harvest site for bone grafts if there are minimal or no resulting risks to tibial stability. Methods: Ten matched-pair cadaver tibiae were randomized to have a 1.5 × 4.0 cm cortical graft harvested from the tibial crest or 1 cm posterior to the tibial crest Both locations were 6 cm distal to the tibial plateau. The grafts were removed using a high-speed oscillating saw, and each end of the tibia was mounted for testing and loaded onto a servohydraulic test frame. The samples were anally loaded with 720 N (162 lbs) of force, and an external rotational torque was applied at 5 degrees per second to failure. Failure torque for each tibia was recorded. A paired Student's t-test was used to determine whether any observed differences in failure torques were significant Results: The torque to failure range for oncrest grafts was 11.65 to 81.76 Nm (average, 44.53 Nm; SD, 22.82 Nm). The torque to failure range for the tibiae with the graft 1 cm off-crest was 13.30 to 70.45 Nm (average, 41.64 Nm; SD, 17.83 Nm). All fractures were spiral, included the distalmost anterior corner of the donor site, and extended distally. There was no significant difference in torque to failure between the two donor sites (p = 0.22). The grafts varied consistently in quality. Conclusion: Considering that there was no statistically significant difference in torque to failure between the two groups of tibiae, the site for tibial bone graft can be selected based on the shape of the cortical graft necessary for each specific surgery.

AB - Background: Use of tibial strut grafts has several potential advantages over other donor sites and would be ideal as a harvest site for bone grafts if there are minimal or no resulting risks to tibial stability. Methods: Ten matched-pair cadaver tibiae were randomized to have a 1.5 × 4.0 cm cortical graft harvested from the tibial crest or 1 cm posterior to the tibial crest Both locations were 6 cm distal to the tibial plateau. The grafts were removed using a high-speed oscillating saw, and each end of the tibia was mounted for testing and loaded onto a servohydraulic test frame. The samples were anally loaded with 720 N (162 lbs) of force, and an external rotational torque was applied at 5 degrees per second to failure. Failure torque for each tibia was recorded. A paired Student's t-test was used to determine whether any observed differences in failure torques were significant Results: The torque to failure range for oncrest grafts was 11.65 to 81.76 Nm (average, 44.53 Nm; SD, 22.82 Nm). The torque to failure range for the tibiae with the graft 1 cm off-crest was 13.30 to 70.45 Nm (average, 41.64 Nm; SD, 17.83 Nm). All fractures were spiral, included the distalmost anterior corner of the donor site, and extended distally. There was no significant difference in torque to failure between the two donor sites (p = 0.22). The grafts varied consistently in quality. Conclusion: Considering that there was no statistically significant difference in torque to failure between the two groups of tibiae, the site for tibial bone graft can be selected based on the shape of the cortical graft necessary for each specific surgery.

KW - Biomechanical

KW - Cadaver

KW - Graft

KW - Tibia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645277138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645277138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/107110070602700307

DO - 10.1177/107110070602700307

M3 - Article

C2 - 16539901

AN - SCOPUS:33645277138

VL - 27

SP - 190

EP - 195

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 3

ER -