Biology-inspired microphysiological systems to advance patient benefit and animal welfare in drug development

Uwe Marx, Takafumi Akabane, Tommy B. Andersson, Elizabeth Baker, Mario Beilmann, Sonja Beken, Susanne Brendler-Schwaab, Murat Cirit, Rhiannon David, Eva Maria Dehne, Isabell Durieux, Lorna Ewart, Suzanne C. Fitzpatrick, Olivier Frey, Florian Fuchs, Linda G. Griffith, Geraldine A. Hamilton, Thomas Hartung, Julia Hoeng, Helena HogbergDavid J. Hughes, Donald E. Ingber, Anita Iskandar, Toshiyuki Kanamori, Hajime Kojima, Jochen Kuehnl, Marcel Leist, Bo Li, Peter Loskill, Donna L. Mendrick, Thomas Neumann, Giorgia Pallocca, Ivan Rusyn, Lena Smirnova, Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Danilo A. Tagle, Alexander Tonevitsky, Sergej Tsyb, Martin Trapecar, Bob Van de Water, Janny Van den Eijnden-van Raaij, Paul Vulto, Kengo Watanabe, Armin Wolf, Xiaobing Zhou, Adrian Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The first microfluidic microphysiological systems (MPS) entered the academic scene more than 15 years ago and were considered an enabling technology to human (patho)biology in vitro and, therefore, provide alternative approaches to laboratory animals in pharmaceutical drug development and academic research. Nowadays, the field generates more than a thousand scientific publications per year. Despite the MPS hype in academia and by platform providers, which says this technology is about to reshape the entire in vitro culture landscape in basic and applied research, MPS approaches have neither been widely adopted by the pharmaceutical industry yet nor reached regulated drug authorization processes at all. Here, 46 leading experts from all stakeholders - academia, MPS supplier industry, pharmaceutical and consumer products industries, and leading regulatory agencies - worldwide have analyzed existing challenges and hurdles along the MPS-based assay life cycle in a second workshop of this kind in June 2019. They identified that the level of qualification of MPS-based assays for a given context of use and a communication gap between stakeholders are the major challenges for industrial adoption by end-users. Finally, a regulatory acceptance dilemma exists against that background. This t4 report elaborates on these findings in detail and summarizes solutions how to overcome the roadblocks. It provides recommendations and a roadmap towards regulatory accepted MPS-based models and assays for patients' benefit and further laboratory animal reduction in drug development. Finally, experts highlighted the potential of MPS-based human disease models to feedback into laboratory animal replacement in basic life science research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-394
Number of pages30
JournalALTEX
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • assay qualification
  • drug testing
  • iPSC-derived organoids
  • industrial adoption
  • microphysiological systems
  • multi-organ-chip
  • organ-on-chip
  • organoids
  • regulatory acceptance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biology-inspired microphysiological systems to advance patient benefit and animal welfare in drug development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this