Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers

Jonathan Borak, Greg Sirianni, Howard Cohen, Susan Chemerynski, Frans Jongeneelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Traditional methods for monitoring occupational creosote exposure have focused on inhalation. However, there is evidence that dermal exposure contributes importantly to total systemic dose, as measured by biological monitoring methods. This study was conducted to further characterize the relationships between inhalation and dermal exposures to creosote, and to compare traditional ambient exposure monitoring versus biological monitoring in 36 creosote-exposed wood treatment workers. Full-shift personal air samples were obtained, along with post-shift and next-day urine measurements for 1-hydroxypyrene. There was little or no correlation between airborne measures and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (r2 = 0.05 to 0.35). More than 90% of 1-hydroxypyrene could be attributed to dermal exposure. These data indicate that traditional monitoring methods may be inappropriate for creosote workers, raising concerns about the adequacy of methods currently mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-319
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume44
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Creosote
Environmental Monitoring
Skin
United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Inhalation Exposure
Occupational Exposure
Inhalation
Air
Urine
1-hydroxypyrene

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Borak, J., Sirianni, G., Cohen, H., Chemerynski, S., & Jongeneelen, F. (2002). Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44(4), 310-319.

Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers. / Borak, Jonathan; Sirianni, Greg; Cohen, Howard; Chemerynski, Susan; Jongeneelen, Frans.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2002, p. 310-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borak, J, Sirianni, G, Cohen, H, Chemerynski, S & Jongeneelen, F 2002, 'Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers', Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 310-319.
Borak J, Sirianni G, Cohen H, Chemerynski S, Jongeneelen F. Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2002;44(4):310-319.
Borak, Jonathan ; Sirianni, Greg ; Cohen, Howard ; Chemerynski, Susan ; Jongeneelen, Frans. / Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 310-319.
@article{0b5bd92594bf4d6985733ba5fec0cc0c,
title = "Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers",
abstract = "Traditional methods for monitoring occupational creosote exposure have focused on inhalation. However, there is evidence that dermal exposure contributes importantly to total systemic dose, as measured by biological monitoring methods. This study was conducted to further characterize the relationships between inhalation and dermal exposures to creosote, and to compare traditional ambient exposure monitoring versus biological monitoring in 36 creosote-exposed wood treatment workers. Full-shift personal air samples were obtained, along with post-shift and next-day urine measurements for 1-hydroxypyrene. There was little or no correlation between airborne measures and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (r2 = 0.05 to 0.35). More than 90{\%} of 1-hydroxypyrene could be attributed to dermal exposure. These data indicate that traditional monitoring methods may be inappropriate for creosote workers, raising concerns about the adequacy of methods currently mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.",
author = "Jonathan Borak and Greg Sirianni and Howard Cohen and Susan Chemerynski and Frans Jongeneelen",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "310--319",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological versus ambient exposure monitoring of creosote facility workers

AU - Borak, Jonathan

AU - Sirianni, Greg

AU - Cohen, Howard

AU - Chemerynski, Susan

AU - Jongeneelen, Frans

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Traditional methods for monitoring occupational creosote exposure have focused on inhalation. However, there is evidence that dermal exposure contributes importantly to total systemic dose, as measured by biological monitoring methods. This study was conducted to further characterize the relationships between inhalation and dermal exposures to creosote, and to compare traditional ambient exposure monitoring versus biological monitoring in 36 creosote-exposed wood treatment workers. Full-shift personal air samples were obtained, along with post-shift and next-day urine measurements for 1-hydroxypyrene. There was little or no correlation between airborne measures and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (r2 = 0.05 to 0.35). More than 90% of 1-hydroxypyrene could be attributed to dermal exposure. These data indicate that traditional monitoring methods may be inappropriate for creosote workers, raising concerns about the adequacy of methods currently mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

AB - Traditional methods for monitoring occupational creosote exposure have focused on inhalation. However, there is evidence that dermal exposure contributes importantly to total systemic dose, as measured by biological monitoring methods. This study was conducted to further characterize the relationships between inhalation and dermal exposures to creosote, and to compare traditional ambient exposure monitoring versus biological monitoring in 36 creosote-exposed wood treatment workers. Full-shift personal air samples were obtained, along with post-shift and next-day urine measurements for 1-hydroxypyrene. There was little or no correlation between airborne measures and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (r2 = 0.05 to 0.35). More than 90% of 1-hydroxypyrene could be attributed to dermal exposure. These data indicate that traditional monitoring methods may be inappropriate for creosote workers, raising concerns about the adequacy of methods currently mandated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036123526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036123526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11977417

AN - SCOPUS:0036123526

VL - 44

SP - 310

EP - 319

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 4

ER -