Bioequivalence of biosimilar tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors compared with their reference biologics: A systematic review

Francine Chingcuanco, Jodi Segal, Seoyoung C. Kim, George Caleb Alexander

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Biosimilars are of growing clinical, regulatory, and commercial importance. Purpose: To summarize evidence about the bioequivalence between biosimilar and reference tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS from inception through 13 April 2016 and ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, EU Clinical Trials Register, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicines Agency from inception through 30 April 2016. Study Selection: Published English-language studies of any size or design that compared the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse events, or immunogenicity of a biosimilar TNF-α inhibitor with a reference biologic in humans. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, extracted data from selected studies, and assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: Of 19 eligible studies, 8 were phase 1 randomized trials, 5 were phase 3 randomized trials, and 6 were observational studies. Most phase 1 trials (n = 7) involved healthy volunteers, phase 3 trials involved patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and observational studies involved those with rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease. All phase 1 trials showed that pharmacokinetic parameters of the biosimilar and respective biologic were within the prespecified equivalence margin of 80% to 125%. Phase 3 trials suggested similar clinical responses and adverse events. Adverse events were usually of mild to moderate severity. Two cross-sectional observational studies showed cross-reactivity between products, whereas 4 cohort studies of patients switched from reference to biosimilar products suggested similar efficacy and safety outcomes. Limitation: Possible publication bias, small sample sizes of many studies, and lack of published studies for several biosimilars. Conclusion: Preliminary evidence supports the biosimilarity and interchangeability of biosimilar and reference TNF-α inhibitors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-574
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume165
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 18 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bioequivalence of biosimilar tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors compared with their reference biologics: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this