Bilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: Confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery?

Hazel B. Nichols, Kala Visvanathan, Polly A. Newcomb, John M. Hampton, Kathleen M. Egan, Linda Titus-Ernstoff, Amy Trentham-Dietz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1111-1120
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume173
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2011

Fingerprint

Ovariectomy
Breast Neoplasms
Leiomyoma
Endometriosis
Hysterectomy
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Reproductive History
Risk Reduction Behavior
Licensure
Medicare
Uterus
Registries
Case-Control Studies
Ovary
Logistic Models
Interviews
Population
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • breast neoplasms
  • case-control studies
  • confounding factors
  • endometriosis
  • epidemiology
  • hysterectomy
  • leiomyoma
  • ovariectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Bilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer : Confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery? / Nichols, Hazel B.; Visvanathan, Kala; Newcomb, Polly A.; Hampton, John M.; Egan, Kathleen M.; Titus-Ernstoff, Linda; Trentham-Dietz, Amy.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 173, No. 10, 15.05.2011, p. 1111-1120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nichols, Hazel B. ; Visvanathan, Kala ; Newcomb, Polly A. ; Hampton, John M. ; Egan, Kathleen M. ; Titus-Ernstoff, Linda ; Trentham-Dietz, Amy. / Bilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer : Confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery?. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2011 ; Vol. 173, No. 10. pp. 1111-1120.
@article{520de015d5c04534af0004495eb6108a,
title = "Bilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: Confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery?",
abstract = "Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20{\%}-50{\%} when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95{\%} confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95{\%} confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.",
keywords = "breast neoplasms, case-control studies, confounding factors, endometriosis, epidemiology, hysterectomy, leiomyoma, ovariectomy",
author = "Nichols, {Hazel B.} and Kala Visvanathan and Newcomb, {Polly A.} and Hampton, {John M.} and Egan, {Kathleen M.} and Linda Titus-Ernstoff and Amy Trentham-Dietz",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwq510",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "173",
pages = "1111--1120",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bilateral oophorectomy in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer

T2 - Confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery?

AU - Nichols, Hazel B.

AU - Visvanathan, Kala

AU - Newcomb, Polly A.

AU - Hampton, John M.

AU - Egan, Kathleen M.

AU - Titus-Ernstoff, Linda

AU - Trentham-Dietz, Amy

PY - 2011/5/15

Y1 - 2011/5/15

N2 - Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.

AB - Bilateral oophorectomy is often performed during hysterectomy for benign conditions and can reduce breast cancer risk by 20%-50% when performed at younger ages. Accuracy of estimating the decrease in breast cancer risk associated with bilateral oophorectomy could be affected by common conditions that lead to surgery, such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. The authors examined the potential for confounding by nonmalignant indications for surgery on breast cancer risk estimates in a population-based case-control study of invasive breast cancer newly diagnosed in 1992-1995. Breast cancer cases (N = 4,935) aged 50-79 years were identified from Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire tumor registries; similarly aged controls (N = 5,111) were selected from driver's license and Medicare lists. Reproductive and medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with multivariate logistic regression. Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy at age ≤40 years had significantly reduced odds of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.74, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.90) compared with women with intact ovaries and uterus. Effect estimates were virtually unchanged after adjustment for uterine fibroids or endometriosis history. Results indicate that breast cancer risk reductions conferred by bilateral oophorectomy are not strongly confounded by failure to account for nonmalignant indications for surgery.

KW - breast neoplasms

KW - case-control studies

KW - confounding factors

KW - endometriosis

KW - epidemiology

KW - hysterectomy

KW - leiomyoma

KW - ovariectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955787028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955787028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwq510

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwq510

M3 - Article

C2 - 21430192

AN - SCOPUS:79955787028

VL - 173

SP - 1111

EP - 1120

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 10

ER -