Beyond the first trimester screen: Can we predict who will choose invasive testing?

Suzanne Van Landingham, Jessica L Bienstock, Elizabeth Wood Denne, Nancy A Hueppchen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine what factors, in addition to a positive first trimester aneuploidy screen, correlate with a pregnant patient's decision to undergo invasive prenatal testing. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies referred to the Johns Hopkins Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment Center between 2001 and 2009 with an indication of positive first trimester screen. We compared demographic factors and numerical first trimester screen results with invasive testing uptake. Risk difference calculations and linear modeling were used for analysis. Results: A total of 171 eligible patients were identified. Maternal age, race, residual risk, marital status, and year of first trimester screen correlated significantly with invasive testing uptake. Family history was predictive of invasive testing uptake for patients younger than 35 years only. Type of elevated risk (trisomy 21 vs. 18 and 13), assisted reproductive technology status, parity, and increase from age-related risk were not predictive. A general linear model for relative risk with Gaussian error showed significant interaction between the variables of age and family history, so the two traits were analyzed separately (P = 0.009). Conclusions: Among patients with positive first trimester screen results, several demographic traits are predictive of invasive testing uptake. This information can help providers to identify patients at increased risk of declining invasive testing and can help providers anticipate educational needs. Further investigation should be conducted to elucidate the causes of these differences, which may relate to misinformation about the testing options and differences in values systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-544
Number of pages6
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

First Pregnancy Trimester
Demography
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Maternal Age
Marital Status
Aneuploidy
Down Syndrome
Parity
Prenatal Diagnosis
Linear Models
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Communication
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • aneuploidy
  • first trimester screen
  • genetic counseling
  • invasive testing
  • prenatal diagnosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Beyond the first trimester screen : Can we predict who will choose invasive testing? / Van Landingham, Suzanne; Bienstock, Jessica L; Wood Denne, Elizabeth; Hueppchen, Nancy A.

In: Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 539-544.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ef80b399e574dd29f9f09ca25a874e3,
title = "Beyond the first trimester screen: Can we predict who will choose invasive testing?",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine what factors, in addition to a positive first trimester aneuploidy screen, correlate with a pregnant patient's decision to undergo invasive prenatal testing. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies referred to the Johns Hopkins Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment Center between 2001 and 2009 with an indication of positive first trimester screen. We compared demographic factors and numerical first trimester screen results with invasive testing uptake. Risk difference calculations and linear modeling were used for analysis. Results: A total of 171 eligible patients were identified. Maternal age, race, residual risk, marital status, and year of first trimester screen correlated significantly with invasive testing uptake. Family history was predictive of invasive testing uptake for patients younger than 35 years only. Type of elevated risk (trisomy 21 vs. 18 and 13), assisted reproductive technology status, parity, and increase from age-related risk were not predictive. A general linear model for relative risk with Gaussian error showed significant interaction between the variables of age and family history, so the two traits were analyzed separately (P = 0.009). Conclusions: Among patients with positive first trimester screen results, several demographic traits are predictive of invasive testing uptake. This information can help providers to identify patients at increased risk of declining invasive testing and can help providers anticipate educational needs. Further investigation should be conducted to elucidate the causes of these differences, which may relate to misinformation about the testing options and differences in values systems.",
keywords = "aneuploidy, first trimester screen, genetic counseling, invasive testing, prenatal diagnosis",
author = "{Van Landingham}, Suzanne and Bienstock, {Jessica L} and {Wood Denne}, Elizabeth and Hueppchen, {Nancy A}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820a7701",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "539--544",
journal = "Genetics in Medicine",
issn = "1098-3600",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the first trimester screen

T2 - Can we predict who will choose invasive testing?

AU - Van Landingham, Suzanne

AU - Bienstock, Jessica L

AU - Wood Denne, Elizabeth

AU - Hueppchen, Nancy A

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine what factors, in addition to a positive first trimester aneuploidy screen, correlate with a pregnant patient's decision to undergo invasive prenatal testing. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies referred to the Johns Hopkins Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment Center between 2001 and 2009 with an indication of positive first trimester screen. We compared demographic factors and numerical first trimester screen results with invasive testing uptake. Risk difference calculations and linear modeling were used for analysis. Results: A total of 171 eligible patients were identified. Maternal age, race, residual risk, marital status, and year of first trimester screen correlated significantly with invasive testing uptake. Family history was predictive of invasive testing uptake for patients younger than 35 years only. Type of elevated risk (trisomy 21 vs. 18 and 13), assisted reproductive technology status, parity, and increase from age-related risk were not predictive. A general linear model for relative risk with Gaussian error showed significant interaction between the variables of age and family history, so the two traits were analyzed separately (P = 0.009). Conclusions: Among patients with positive first trimester screen results, several demographic traits are predictive of invasive testing uptake. This information can help providers to identify patients at increased risk of declining invasive testing and can help providers anticipate educational needs. Further investigation should be conducted to elucidate the causes of these differences, which may relate to misinformation about the testing options and differences in values systems.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine what factors, in addition to a positive first trimester aneuploidy screen, correlate with a pregnant patient's decision to undergo invasive prenatal testing. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies referred to the Johns Hopkins Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment Center between 2001 and 2009 with an indication of positive first trimester screen. We compared demographic factors and numerical first trimester screen results with invasive testing uptake. Risk difference calculations and linear modeling were used for analysis. Results: A total of 171 eligible patients were identified. Maternal age, race, residual risk, marital status, and year of first trimester screen correlated significantly with invasive testing uptake. Family history was predictive of invasive testing uptake for patients younger than 35 years only. Type of elevated risk (trisomy 21 vs. 18 and 13), assisted reproductive technology status, parity, and increase from age-related risk were not predictive. A general linear model for relative risk with Gaussian error showed significant interaction between the variables of age and family history, so the two traits were analyzed separately (P = 0.009). Conclusions: Among patients with positive first trimester screen results, several demographic traits are predictive of invasive testing uptake. This information can help providers to identify patients at increased risk of declining invasive testing and can help providers anticipate educational needs. Further investigation should be conducted to elucidate the causes of these differences, which may relate to misinformation about the testing options and differences in values systems.

KW - aneuploidy

KW - first trimester screen

KW - genetic counseling

KW - invasive testing

KW - prenatal diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959194256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959194256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820a7701

DO - 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31820a7701

M3 - Article

C2 - 21415760

AN - SCOPUS:79959194256

VL - 13

SP - 539

EP - 544

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

SN - 1098-3600

IS - 6

ER -