Abstract
Missing data ubiquitously occur in randomized controlled trials and may compromise the causal inference if inappropriately handled. Some problematic missing data methods such as complete case (CC) analysis and last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) are unfortunately still common in nutrition trials. This situation is partially caused by investigator confusion on missing data assumptions for different methods. In this statistical guidance, we provide a brief introduction of missing data mechanisms and the unreasonable assumptions that underlie CC and LOCF and recommend 2 appropriate missing data methods: multiple imputation and full information maximum likelihood.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 504-508 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | American Journal of Clinical Nutrition |
Volume | 109 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2019 |
Keywords
- full information maximum likelihood
- missing data
- missing data mechanisms
- multiple imputation
- randomized controlled trials
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- Nutrition and Dietetics